SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BRIC COUNTRIES AND TURKEY S LEVELS OF EXPORT SPECIALIZATION AND COMPETITION

BRIC ÜLKELERİ VE TÜRKİYE'NİN İHRACAT UZMANLAŞMA VE REKABET DÜZEYLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ

Birol ERKAN
Pages
101–131
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is remarkable that China specialized in the export of highvalue added R & D-based products and continuously increased competitiveadvantage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Crises focused on developed countries has occured in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However,emerging economies have continued to increase economic growth andcompetitiveness generally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is remarkable that China specialized in the export of highvalue added R & D-based products and continuously increased competitiveadvantage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Crises focused on developed countries has occured in recent years. However,emerging economies have continued to increase economic growth andcompetitiveness generally. Especially, the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India,China) played a leading role in the economies. Turkey has also accompanied toincreasing economic performance of the BRIC countries in recent years, and global competition wars have escalated among the countries mentioned day byday.In this paper, between 1993-2010, by evaluating Turkey and the BRIC countries'export similarities, level of export specialization and competition on the basis ofproduct and factor intensity were calculated. The results of this study show thatBRIC economies specialized in the export of raw materials and labor-intensiveproducts. Whereas, Turkey mainly specialized in the export of labor and capitalintensive products. It is remarkable that China specialized in the export of highvalue added R & D-based products and continuously increased competitiveadvantage.

Özet

Küresel ekonomide son yıllarda gelişmiş ülkeler odaklı krizler ortayaçıkmaktadır. Buna karşın, yükselen ekonomiler genel olarak ekonomik büyümeve rekabet güçlerini arttırmaya devam etmiş, özellikle de BRIC ülkeleri(Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin) söz konusu ekonomiler içinde öncü bir roloynamıştır. BRIC ülkelerinin artan ekonomik performanslarına son yıllardaTürkiye de eşlik etmiş, sözü edilen ülkeler arasında küresel rekabet savaşlarıdaha da kızışmıştır. Çalışmada, 1993-2010 yılları arasında Türkiye ve BRIC ülkelerinin ihracatbenzerlikleri ortaya koyularak, ürün ve faktör yoğunluğu bazında ihracatuzmanlaşma ve rekabet düzeyi hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar,BRIC ekonomilerinin genel olarak hammadde ve emek yoğun ürünlerinihracatında uzmanlaştığını göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, Türkiye daha çokemek ve sermaye yoğun ürünlerlerin ihracatında uzmanlaşmıştır. BRICülkelerinden özellikle Çinin katma değeri yüksek ar-ge bazlı ürünlerinihracatında uzmanlaşması ve rekabet üstünlüğünü sürekli arttırması dikkatçekicidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAN, B. (2022). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BRIC COUNTRIES AND TURKEY S LEVELS OF EXPORT SPECIALIZATION AND COMPETITION. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 101–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/499657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Batra, A., Khan, Z. (2005) “Revealed Comparative Advantage: An Analysis for India and China”, Indian Council f or Research on International Economic Relations, Working Paper, 168, New Delhi, 1-85.
  2. Bekmez, S., Rezioğlu, M. (2008)
  3. Rekabet, Rekabet Gücü ve Rekabet Gücünü Ölçme Yöntemleri, Türkiye Avrupa Birliği Sektörel Rekabet Analizleri, Nobel Yay. Balassa, B. (1965) “Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage”, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33(2), 99-123.
  4. Beningo, S. (2006) “Trade and Transportation Between the United States and China,and Between the United States and India”, 2006 Conf erence of the Society of Government Economists, Washington. Changjun Y., Ping H. (2001) “Does Comparative Advantage Explain Export Patterns in China?”, CERDI, Etudes et Documents, 1-31. Choorikkad V., “India and China:Changing Patterns of Comparative Advantage?”, India Development Report, http://www.globelicsindia2006.org/Veeramani.pdf, 11.01.2008 tarihi itibariyle. Coxhead, I. (2007) “A New Resource Curse?Impacts of China’s Boom on Comparative Advantage and Resource Dependence in Southeast Asia”, World Development, 35(7). Farhad M., Saeed Y., Mostafa M., Gharahdaghi, A. A. ftp://ftp.fao.org/upload/./672_en.doc, 22.06.2011 tarihi itibariyle. Hinloopen, J. (2001) “On the empirical distribution of the Balassa Index”, Review of World Economics, 137(1), 1-26.
  5. Hufbauer, G. (1974) “Specialization by Industrial Countries: Extent and Consequences”, The International Division of Labour: Problems and Perspectives-International Symposium, Germany, 3-38.
  6. Hult, T. (2009) “The BRIC Countries”, Global EDGE Business Review, 3(4), 1. Kösekahyaoğlu, L. (2003) “Comparative Advantage of Turkey With Regard to The EU”, SDÜ İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, 8(2), 147-156.
  7. Küçükkiremitçi, O. (2006) “Sanayi Sektörünün Dış Ticaret Performansının Rekabet Gücüne Göre Değerlendirilmesi (1995- 2005 Dönemi)”, T.C. İnönü Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Ulusal Bağımsızlık İçin Türkiye İktisat Politikaları Kurultayı- 13-16 Haziran 2006,
  8. Malatya. Mikic, M. (2005) “Commonly Used Trade Indicators:A Note”, ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop on Trade Research, UNESCAP, 1-22.
  9. Mykhnenko, V. (2005) “What Type of Capitalism in Eastern Europe?Institutional Structures,Revealed Comparative Advantages,and Performance of Poland and Ukraine”, Centre f or Public Policy f or Regions (CPPR) Discussion Paper, 6, 1-39.
  10. Porter, M.E. (1991) “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy ”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-