Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

EFFECT OF INTERNATONAL PARTNERSHIP STRUCTURE TO STOCK RETURNS: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA ISTANBUL

ULUSLARARASI ORTAKLIK YAPISININ HİSSE SENEDİ GETİRİSİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: BORSA İSTANBUL UYGULAMASI

Pages
93–106
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to results obtained from the study, stockreturn performance can be determined in the line with literature by its current ratio, return on asset, returnon equity and net profit margin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the effects of stock return and international ownership concentration for listedfirms in Borsa Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two stage logistic regression model is used for the period of 2007 and 20 11.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to results obtained from the study, stockreturn performance can be determined in the line with literature by its current ratio, return on asset, returnon equity and net profit margin.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of stock return and international ownership concentration for listedfirms in Borsa Istanbul. Two stage logistic regression model is used for the period of 2007 and 20 11. Weconclude that there is no signal for international ownership structure impact except 2007 that foreigndirect investments inflows were more than other years. According to results obtained from the study, stockreturn performance can be determined in the line with literature by its current ratio, return on asset, returnon equity and net profit margin.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Borsa İstanbulda faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin uluslararası ortaklık yapısının hissesenedi getirilerine olan etkisi incelenmiştir. 2007- 2011 yılları arasında yapılan analizde iki kategoriliLoj istik Regresyon Modeli kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda doğrudan yabancı sermaye girişinin enyoğun yaşandığı 2007 yılı dışındaki yıllarda hisse senedi getirilerine olan etkisi açısından uluslararasısermaye yapısından söz etmek mümkün değildir. Çalışmada, hisse senedi getirisi üzerinde literatürlede uyumlu olarak cari oran, aktif karlılığı, özsermaye karlılığı ve net kar marj ı değişkenlerinin etkisiortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, E., ŞAHİN, S. (2022). EFFECT OF INTERNATONAL PARTNERSHIP STRUCTURE TO STOCK RETURNS: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA ISTANBUL. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 93–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/499623

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Agresti, Alan (1996), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons. Aydın, N., Sayim M. ve Yalama A. (2007) “Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 11:103-111.
  2. Bayrakdaroğlu, A. (2010) “Mülkiyet Yapısı ve Finansal Performans: İMKB Örneği”, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2:11-20.
  3. Bulut H., Çankaya F. ve Er B. (2009) “Yönetici Sahiplik Düzeyinin Halk Arz Sonrası Faaliyet Performansı ve Düşük Fiyatlandırma Üzerine Etkisi: İMKB Örneği”, Gazi Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11:101-112.
  4. Commander, S. Ve Svej nar, J. (2007) “Do Institutions, Ownership, Exporting and Competition Explain Firm Performance Evidance from 26 Transition Countries”, IZA Discussion Paper Series, No.2637 Crain, T. L. ve Stitts, R. H. (1994) “A comparison of Gross Profit Margins Between Foreign-Controlled Domestic Corporations and Comparable U.S.-Controlled Domestic Corporations”, Journal of International Accounting, 3:85–101. Çıtak, L.(2007). “The Impact of Ownership Structure on Company Performance: A Panel Data Analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed (ISE-100) Companies”. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 9:231-245.
  5. Dunning J.H. (1958), American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry, Allen and Unwin, London Dwivedi N. ve Jain A.K. (2005) “Corporate Governance and Performance of Indian Firms: The Effect of Board Size and Ownership”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3:161-172.
  6. Ege, İ. ve Bayraktaroğlu, A. (2009) “İMKB Şirketlerinin Hisse Senedi Getiri Başarılarının Loj istik Regresyon Tekniği ile Analizi”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10:139–158. Emmanuel, C.R. ve Oyelere, P.B. (2002) “Differences in the reported Performances of Foreign-Controlled and Domestically-Controlled Firms: Some U.K. Evidence”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 11: 1–17. Erdoğan, A.I. (2011) “Foreign-Owned Firms and Domestically-Owned Firms in Turkey: An Analysis of the Differentiating Characteristics”, Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 19:124-128.
  7. Gill, J. (2001),
  8. Generalized Linear Models, USA Sage University Paper. Hosmer, D. W. ve Lemeshow, S. (2000), Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd Edition,
  9. USA, John Wiley & Sons. Jensen, M. C. ve Meckling, W. H. (1976) “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305–360. Kalaycı, Ş. ve Karataş, A. (2005) “H