Journals / Ekoloji / 2013 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 89

$MF_{e}2O_{4}$ (m=ni, cu) nanopartiküllerinin sentezi, karakterizasyonu ve ağır metal giderim verimliliği

Synthesis, characterization and, the heavy metal removal efficiency of $MF_{e}2O_{4}$(m=ni, cu)

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
89–96
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The measurements were repeated several times with the same sample and almost the same results were obtained each time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study described in this paper was to compare the removal of the heavy metals zinc, nickel, and copper from synthetic wastewater by using nanoparticles of $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ and $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) The nanoparticles of nickel and copper ferrite $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ and $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) were produced by the PEG assisted hydrothermal method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then the heavy metal removal efficiencies and adsorption capacities of the nanoparticles $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ and $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$ were calculated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The measurements were repeated several times with the same sample and almost the same results were obtained each time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study described in this paper was to compare the removal of the heavy metals zinc, nickel, and copper from synthetic wastewater by using nanoparticles of $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ and $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) The nanoparticles of nickel and copper ferrite $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ and $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) were produced by the PEG assisted hydrothermal method. The structural and morphological characterizations were determined using XRD, FT-IR, and SEM. These nanoparticles were dispersed into synthetic wastewater contaminated with zinc, nickel, and copper. Once they had bound to the heavy metals, they were removed from the water solution using a strong magnet. The metal concentrations of the filtered samples were determined by using atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Then the heavy metal removal efficiencies and adsorption capacities of the nanoparticles $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ and $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$ were calculated. The removal efficiencies of Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) by using $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ nanoparticles was calculated as 83.50%, 98.85%, and 99.80%, respectively. The removal efficiencies of Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) by using $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$ nanoparticles were calculated as 92.55%, 36.56 %, and 99.91%, respectively. The measurements were repeated several times with the same sample and almost the same results were obtained each time.

Özet

Bu makalede anlatılan çalışmanın amacı sentetik atıksulardan çinko, nikel ve bakır gibi ağır metallerin giderimini $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ ve $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$)nanopartikülleri kullanarak incelemektir. Nikel ve bakır ferrit nanopartiküller $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ ve $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) PEG-destekli hidrotermal metod kullanılarak sentezlenmiştir. Nanopartiküllerin yapısal ve morfolojik karakterizasyonu için XRD, FT-IR ve SEM kullanılmıştır.Karakterize edilen nanopartiküller çinko, nikel ve bakır içeren sentetik atıksuyun içerisine bırakılmıştır. Ağırmetallerin nanopartiküllerle adsorpsiyonunun ardından güçlü bir mıknatıs ile nanopartiküller atıksudan ayrılmıştır. Süzülen atıksu içerisindeki ağır metal konsantrasyonları atomik absorpsiyon spektrofotometresi (AAS) ile belirlenmiştir. Daha sonra kullanılan nanopartiküllerin $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ ve $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) ağır metal giderim verimleri ile adsorpsiyon kapasiteleri hesaplanmıştır. $CuFe_{2}O_{4}$ nanopartikülünün Cu(II), Ni(II) ve Zn(II) giderim verimleri sırasıyla %83,50, %98,85 ve %99,80 olarak belirlenmiştir. $NiFe_{2}O_{4}$) nanopartikülünün Cu(II), Ni(II) ve Zn(II) giderim verimleri ise sırasıyla %92.55, %36.56 ve %99.91 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Deneyler aynı örnekle birçok kez tekrar edilmiş ve benzer sonuçlar elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, N., YALCIN, A., KÖSEOĞLU, Y., ŞAHİN, M. (2022). $MF_{e}2O_{4}$ (m=ni, cu) nanopartiküllerinin sentezi, karakterizasyonu ve ağır metal giderim verimliliği. Ekoloji, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 89, 89–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/498976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Afkhami A, Moosavi R (2010) Adsorptive removal of Congo red, a carcinogenic textile dye, from aqueous solutions by maghemite nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials 174: 398-403.
  2. Aljendeel HA (2011) Removal of heavy metals using reverse osmosis. Journal of Engineering 3(17): 647- 658. Bakalar T, Bugel M, Gajdosova L (2009) Heavy metal removal using reverse osmosis. Acta Montanistica Slovaca 14(3): 250-253.
  3. Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Various treatment technologies to remove arsenic and mercury from contaminated groundwater: an overview. In: Ohgaki S, Ukushi K (eds), Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Southeast Asian Water Environment, 24–25 October 2003,
  4. Bangkok, Thailand, 433-440.
  5. Cokadar H, İleri R, Ates A, İzgi B (2003), Removal of Nickel (II) ions from aqueous solution by granulated activated carbon (GAC). Ekoloji 12(46): 38-42.
  6. Dermentzis K (2010) Removal of nickel from electroplating rinse waters using electrostatic shielding electrodialysis/electrodeionization. Journal of Hazardous Materials 173(1-3): 647-652.
  7. Dixit S, Hering JG(2003) Effects of Arsenate Reduction and Iron Oxide Transformation on Arsenic Mobility. Environmental Science and Technology 37: 4182-4189.
  8. Djedidi Z, Bouda M, Souissi MA, Cheikh RB, Mercier G, Tyagi RD, Blais JF (2009) Metals removal from soil, fly ash and sewage sludge leachates by precipitation and dewatering properties of the generated sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials 172(2-3): 1372-1382.
  9. Essawy HA, Ibrahim HS (2004) Synthesis and characterization of poly(vinylpyrrolidone-co- methylacrylate) hydrogel for removal and recovery of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Reactive and Functional Polymers 61: 421-432.
  10. Faraz A, Saqib M, Ahmad NM, Rehman FM, Usman M, Mumtaz A, Hassan MA (2012)
  11. Synthesis, Structural, and Magnetic Characterization of Mn1−xNixFe3O4 Spinel Nanoferrites. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 25: 91-100.
  12. Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Progress in Materials Science 33: 223-315.
  13. Gözüak F, Köseoğlu Y, Baykal A, Kavas H (2009) Synthesis and characterization of CoxZn1−xFe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles via a PEG-assisted route. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 32: 2170-2177.
  14. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM (1992) Biologically relevant metal ion-dependent hydroxyl radical generation: An update. FEBS Letters 307: 108-112.
  15. Hao YM, Man C, Hu ZB (2010) Effective removal of Cu (II) ions from aqueous solution by amino- functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Journal