Journals / Ekoloji / 2014 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 90

Üniversite (Eğitim) Yerleşkelerinde Gürültü Kirliliğinin Belirlenmesi: Atatürk Üniversitesi Örneğinde

Determination of the Noise Pollution on University (Education) Campuses: a Case study of Ataturk University

Journal
Ekoloji
Pages
49–54
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Noise mitigation should be considered in theplanning phases of new university campuses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Noise pollution is among the most prominent environmental problems encountered in every aspect ofdaily life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results of the study revealed that the average noise level was 62.70 dB(A)exceeding 55 dB(A), which is an average permitted value.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Noise mitigation should be considered in theplanning phases of new university campuses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Noise pollution is among the most prominent environmental problems encountered in every aspect ofdaily life. The effect of noise pollution is the cause of a variety of serious health hazards. Special care shouldbe taken to prevent noise pollution especially in areas which are sensitive to noise such as hospitals, parks,and educational institutions. One such area is the university campus; however, very little research has beenconducted on this subject. In the present study, noise levels were measured on the Ataturk Universitycampus in Erzurum, Turkey. Results of the study revealed that the average noise level was 62.70 dB(A)exceeding 55 dB(A), which is an average permitted value. A map was created to indicate the noise levelsthroughout the campus. This map is available for use as a reference in the planning phases of newuniversities. Noise mitigation should be considered in theplanning phases of new university campuses.

Özet

Gürültü kirliliği, günümüzün en önemli çevre sorunlarından biri olup, hayatımızın her alanında karşımızaçıkmakta ve önemli sağlık sorunlarına sebep olmaktadır. Özellikle gürültüye hassas alanlar olan hastane,park ve eğitim alanları gibi yerlerde gürültü kirliliği konusunda daha dikkatli davranmalı ve tedbirleralınmalıdır. Gürültüye hassas alalardan biri olan üniversite ve eğitim yerleşkeleri gürültü kirliliği karşı fazlaçalışma yapılmaması önemli bir eksikliktir. Bu amaçla Erzurum kentinde bulunan Atatürk Üniversitesiyerleşkesindeki gürültü kirliliği ölçümleri yapılmış ve gürültü seviyesi izin verilen 55 dB(A)'i geçerek,ortalama 62.70 dB(A) olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca yerleşkenin gürültü haritası oluşturularak,özellikle yeni kurulan üniversite yerleşkelerinde gürültüye karşı alınabilecek önlemler belirtilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

OZER, S., YILMAZ, H., ZENGIN, M. (2022). Üniversite (Eğitim) Yerleşkelerinde Gürültü Kirliliğinin Belirlenmesi: Atatürk Üniversitesi Örneğinde. Ekoloji, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 90, 49–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/498951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ali SA, Tamura A (2003) Road traffic noise levels. Restrictions and annoyance in greater Cario, Egypt. Applied Acoustics 64(8): 815-823.
  2. Allen RW, Davies H, Cohen MA, Mallach G, Kaufman JD, Adar SD (2009) The spatial relationship between traffic-generated air pollution and noise in 2 US cities. Environmental Research 109(3): 334-342.
  3. Anonymous (1974) Leitfaden zur Kartierung der Schutz-und Erholungsfunktionen des Waldes (WFK). J.D. Sauerlaender Verlag, Frankfurt am Main. Anonymous (2014) Cevresel Gürültünün Değerlendirilmesi. Çevre Dostu Yeşil Binalar Derneği Yayınları, İstanbul. http://www.cedbik.org/images/kaynak/7CevreselGurultununDegerlendirilmesi.pdf
  4. Anonymous (1996) International Organization for Standardization, ISO 1996/1- 1982; ISO 1996/2, 3-1987.
  5. Anonymous (1999) SPSS for Windows: Base 10.0 applications guide. SPSS Company, Chicago. Anoymous (2011) Long Term Means of Temperature (1975-2005).
  6. Turkish State Meteorological Service, Regional Management, Erzurum. Aparicio-Ramon DV, Suarez-Varela MMM, Garcia AG, Gonzales AL, Ruano L, Sanchez AM, Caraco EF (1993) Subjective annoyance caused by environmental noise. Journal of Environmetal Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology 12(4): 237-243.
  7. Arana M, Garcia A (1998) A social survey on the effects on environmetal noise pollution in the city of Curitiba. Brazil Applied Acoustics 53: 245-253.
  8. Arı R, Saban H (1999)
  9. Class Management. Günay Ofset, Konya. Atmaca E, Peker I (1999) Sivas'ta Trafik Gürültüsü. Ekoloji 8(30): 3-8.
  10. Aydın A (1998)
  11. Class Management. Anı Publications, Ankara.
  12. Başar H (2000)
  13. Class Management. Pegem Publications, Ankara.
  14. Bernatzky A (1978) Tree ecology and preservation. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Buchta E, Vos JA (1998) Field survey on the annoyance caused by sound from large firearms and road traffic. The Journal of the Acustical Society of America 104(5): 2890-2902.
  15. Demirel Ö (1998) Trabzon'da Gürültü Problemi ve Yeşil Doku ile Çözüm Yaklaşımı. Gürültü Kirliliği TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası Trabzon Şubesi Yayın No:1998/1, Trabzon. Erdoğan E, Yazgan ME (2007) Landscape Architecture Works in the Reduction of Noise Problem in Cities: the Sample of Ankara. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 4(2): 201-210.
  16. Finke L (1980) Abilities of Green Spaces to improve Urban climate and air in the respect of urban planning. İstanbul University Faculty of Forestry Journal 30(2): 225-255.
  17. Green K, Pasternak B, Shore B (1982) Effect of aircraft noise on reading ability of scho