Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Klavikula orta kısım rezeksiyonu sonrası kas devamlılığının rolü: Kadavra çalışması

The role of muscle integrity following midshaft clavicular resections: a cadaveric study

Pages
44–48
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, detachment of the subclavius muscle alone or in combination with the other muscles resulted in abnormal motion between the fragments.Conclusion: The subclavius muscle appears to be the only structure preventing independent movement of the fragments; thus, special care should be taken to maintain the integrity of the subclavius muscle after midshaft clavicular resections.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding midshaft clavicular resections, and the role of muscle integrity has not been studied before.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After resection of 1.5 cm of the clavicle, the trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, deltoid, pectoralis major, and subclavius muscles were detached in five combinations from none to all and with or without the subclavius muscle included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, detachment of the subclavius muscle alone or in combination with the other muscles resulted in abnormal motion between the fragments.Conclusion: The subclavius muscle appears to be the only structure preventing independent movement of the fragments; thus, special care should be taken to maintain the integrity of the subclavius muscle after midshaft clavicular resections.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding midshaft clavicular resections, and the role of muscle integrity has not been studied before. This cadaveric study was designed to investigate the effects of the integrity of muscles after midshaft clavicular resections. Materials and methods: In an experimental design, seven fresh cadaver shoulders were used. After resection of 1.5 cm of the clavicle, the trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, deltoid, pectoralis major, and subclavius muscles were detached in five combinations from none to all and with or without the subclavius muscle included. Graded radiographs were taken to measure the movements of the fragments during abduction, flexion, and extension of the shoulder. Measurements were repeated three times for each procedure.Results: Preservation of all muscle attachments to the clavicle resulted in no abnormal coronal plane motion at the osteotomy site. Similarly, no significant motion in the coronal plane was observed upon detachment of the four muscles with the subclavius muscle being intact. However, detachment of the subclavius muscle alone or in combination with the other muscles resulted in abnormal motion between the fragments.Conclusion: The subclavius muscle appears to be the only structure preventing independent movement of the fragments; thus, special care should be taken to maintain the integrity of the subclavius muscle after midshaft clavicular resections.

Özet

Amaç: Literatürde, klavikula orta kısım rezeksiyonu konusunda çelişkili bilgiler bulunmakta ve bu işlem sonrasında kas devamlılığının araştırılmadığı görülmektedir. Bu kadavra çalışmasında, klavikula orta kısım rezeksiyonu sonrasında kas devamlılığının etkileri araştırıldı. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu deneysel çalışmada yedi taze kadavra omzu kullanıldı. Klavikula orta hattından 1.5 cm rezeksiyon yapıldıktan sonra, trapezius, sternokleidomastoid, deltoid, pektoralis majör ve subklavius kasları beş değişik kombinasyonda (tümü-hiçbiri, subklavius dahil-değil) klavikuladan kesilerek ayrıldı. Omza abdüksiyon, fleksiyon ve ekstansiyon verilerek, fragmanların hareketini ölçmek için işaretli radyografiler çekildi. Her bir durum için ölçümler üç kez tekrarlandı.Bulgular: Tüm kas bağlantılarının korunması durumunda, osteotomi alanında anormal herhangi bir koronal hareket gözlenmedi. Benzer şekilde, subklavius kası klavikulaya tutulu durumdayken, diğer dört kasın ayrılması da, koronal planda önemli bir harekete neden olmadı. Subklavius kasının tek başına veya diğer kaslarla birlikte ayrılması ise fragmanlar arasında anormal hareket oluşumuyla sonuçlandı.Sonuç: Fragmanların birbirinden bağımsız hareketini engelleyen tek kasın subklavius olduğu görüldü. Bu nedenle, klavikula orta kısım rezeksiyonu yapılırken, subklavius kasının devamlılığını korumaya özel bir dikkat gösterilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİTER, E., ÖZAKSOY, D., ARMAN, C., TATARİ, H., KARATOSUN, V., GÜNAL, İ. (2022). Klavikula orta kısım rezeksiyonu sonrası kas devamlılığının rolü: Kadavra çalışması. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 44–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/498834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Connolly JF, Dehne R. Nonunion of the clavicle and thoracic outlet syndrome. J Trauma 1989;29:1127-33
  2. Jupiter JB, Leffert RD. Non-union of the clavicle. Associated complications and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69:753-60
  3. Wick M, Muller EJ, Kollig E, Muhr G. Midshaft fractures of the clavicle with a shortening of more than 2 cm predispose to nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001;121:207-11
  4. Wilkins RM, Johnston RM. Ununited fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1983;65:773-8
  5. Manske DJ, Szabo RM. The operative treatment of midshaft clavicular non-unions. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985; 67:1367-71
  6. Patel CV, Adenwalla HS. Treatment of fractured clavicle by immediate partial subperiosteal resection. J Postgrad Med 1972;18:32-4
  7. Alldred AJ. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1963;45:312-9
  8. Shalom A, Khermosh O, Wientroub S. The natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76:846-7
  9. Moseley HF. The clavicle: its anatomy and function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;58:17-27
  10. Adolfsson L, Lysholm J, Nettelblad H. Adverse effects of extensive clavicular resections and a suggested method of reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8:361-4
  11. Craig EV. Fractures of the clavicle. In: Rockwood CA Jr., Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. Vol. 1, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 1109-61
  12. Abbott LC, Lucas DB. The function of the clavicle; its surgical significance. Ann Surg 1954;140:583-99
  13. Copland SM. Total resection of the clavicle. Am J Surg 1946;72:280-1
  14. Gurd FB. The treatment of complete dislocation of the outer end of the clavicle. An hitherto undescribed operation. Ann Surg 1941;113:1094-8
  15. Lewis MM, Ballet FL, Kroll PG, Bloom N. En bloc clavicular resection: operative procedure and postoperative testing of function. Case reports. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;(193):214-20
  16. Middleton SB, Foley SJ, Foy MA. Partial excision of the clavicle for nonunion in National Hunt Jockeys. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77:778-80
  17. Spar I. Total claviculectomy for pathological fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;(129):236-7
  18. Sales de Gauzy J, Baunin C, Puget C, Fajadet P, Cahuzac JP. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle and thoracic outlet syndrome in adolescence. J Pediatr Orthop B 1999;8:299-301
  19. Tachdjian MO. Pediatric orthopedics. 2nd ed. P