Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Transmisyon ve tarama elektron mikroskopisi kemik mikromimarisinin osteopenik ve osteoporotik hastalarda benzer olduğunu doğrulamaktadır

Transmission and scanning electron microscopy confirm that bone microstructure is similar in osteopenic and osteoporotic patients

Pages
126–132
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The mean cortical bone thickness was 3622.14 mm in osteopenic group and 2323.14 mm in osteoporotic group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The objective was to confirm the finding of “Bone microstructure is similar in osteopenic and osteoporotic patients with femoral neck fracture.” obtained in previous “light microscopy study”, which was new and important data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Fourteen patients (5 males, 9 females) who were admitted with proximal femoral fracture following low energy trauma (patients who participated in the light microscopy study) were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The mean cortical bone thickness was 3622.14 mm in osteopenic group and 2323.14 mm in osteoporotic group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to confirm the finding of “Bone microstructure is similar in osteopenic and osteoporotic patients with femoral neck fracture.” obtained in previous “light microscopy study”, which was new and important data. Patients and methods: Fourteen patients (5 males, 9 females) who were admitted with proximal femoral fracture following low energy trauma (patients who participated in the light microscopy study) were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, including osteopenic group (n=7, mean age 69 years; range 63 to 74 years) and osteoporotic group (n=7, mean age 74.1 years; range 67 to 78 years). Cortical and trabecular bone samples were taken from the patients who underwent endoprosthesis during partial hip arthroplasty and these samples were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy evaluations which are more sophisticated higher resolution techniques. Results: The mean cortical bone thickness was 3622.14 mm in osteopenic group and 2323.14 mm in osteoporotic group (p

Özet

Amaç: Daha önce “ışık mikroskopi çalışması” ile elde edilen “Femur boyun kırığı olan osteopenik ve osteoporotik hastalarda kemik mikromimarisi benzerdir” bulgusunu ki, önemli ve yenidir, teyit etmek amaçlandı. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Düşük enerjili travma sonrası femur proksimal uç kırığı nedeniyle başvuran 14 hasta (5 erkek, 9 kadın) çalışmaya alındı (ışık mikroskopi çalışmasına katılan hastalar). Hastalar kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) ölçümlerine göre osteopenik (n=7, ort. yaş 69 yıl; dağılım 63-74 yıl) ve osteoporotik (n=7, ort. yaş 74.1 yıl; dağılım 67-78 yıl) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Parsiyel kalça artroplastisi sırasında endoprotez uygulanan hastalardan kortikal ve trabeküler kemik örnekleri alındı ve alınan bu örnekler, daha gelişmiş ve yüksek çözünürlüklü transmisyon ve taramalı elektron mikroskopisiyle incelendi. Bulgular: Ortalama kortikal kemik kalınlığı osteopenik grupta 3622.14 mm; osteoporotik grupta ise 2323.14 mm idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTAŞ, G., GÜL, O., ERDOĞAN, D., ELMAS, Ç., ATİK, O. Ş. (2022). Transmisyon ve tarama elektron mikroskopisi kemik mikromimarisinin osteopenik ve osteoporotik hastalarda benzer olduğunu doğrulamaktadır. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 126–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/498641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gül O, Atik OS, Erdoğan D, Göktaş G. Is bone microstructure different between osteopenic and osteoporotic patients with femoral neck fracture?. [Article in Turkish] Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2012;23:15-9
  2. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994;843:1-129
  3. Available from: http://www.osteomark.com/osteomark_ ntx/urine_elisa.aspx 2011 4. Shibahara M, Nishida K, Asahara H, Yoshikawa T, Mitani S, Kondo Y, et al. Increased osteocyte apoptosis during the development of femoral head osteonecrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Med Okayama 2000;54:67-74
  4. Glavert AM. Principles and practice of electron microscope operation. North Holland/American Elsevier. 1974;83-97
  5. Panwar P, Du X, Sharma V, Lamour G, Castro M, Li H, Brömme D. Effects of cysteine proteases on the structural and mechanical properties of collagen fibers. J Biol Chem 20132;288:5940-50
  6. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, et al. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 2001;286:2815-22
  7. Atik OS. Osteoporotic fracture risk assestment. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2008;19:1
  8. Atik OS. Is DXA the gold standard? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2011;22:63
  9. Suvorova EI, Petrenko PP, Buffat PA. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy for evaluation of order/ disorder in bone structure. Scanning 2007;29:162-70
  10. Rubin MA, Jasiuk I, Taylor J, Rubin J, Ganey T, Apkarian RP. TEM analysis of the nanostructure of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone. Bone 2003;33:270-82
  11. Blain H, Chavassieux P, Portero-Muzy N, Bonnel F, Canovas F, Chammas M, et al. Cortical and trabecular bone distribution in the femoral neck in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Bone 2008;43:862-8
  12. Shen Y, Zhang ZM, Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis show different ultrastructural characteristics of trabecular bone of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:35
  13. Bell KL, Loveridge N, Power J, Garrahan N, Stanton M, Lunt M, et al. Structure of the femoral neck in hip fracture: cortical bone loss in the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:111-9
  14. Gabet Y, Bab I. Microarchitectural changes in the aging skeleton. Curr Osteoporos Re