SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Are orthopedic surgeons more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade?

Osteoporotik kırıkların tıbbi tedavisinde ortopedi ve travmatoloji uzmanlarının farkındalığında son on yılda artış var mıdır?

Ramin MORADİ
O Şahap ATİK
Pages
80–84
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Orthopedic surgeons are more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade, but this is temporary

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to whether orthopedic and traumatology specialists are more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Between January 2002 and December 2011, 844 patients (560 females, 284 males; mean age: 78 years; range 60 to 94 years) who suffered from surgical fractures due to low-energy trauma and received no osteoporotic treatment previously without a diagnosis of secondary osteoporosis were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Orthopedic surgeons are more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade, but this is temporary
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to whether orthopedic and traumatology specialists are more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade. Patients and methods: Between January 2002 and December 2011, 844 patients (560 females, 284 males; mean age: 78 years; range 60 to 94 years) who suffered from surgical fractures due to low-energy trauma and received no osteoporotic treatment previously without a diagnosis of secondary osteoporosis were included in the study. The rate of initiation of osteoporotic treatment for surgical fractures due to low-trauma energy was investigated. Results: Treatment initiation varied significantly according to the years (p=0.009), while there was no significant difference in the treatment initiation according to the diagnosis (p=0.735). In 2005 and 2008 years, a two-fold increase was seen in the initiation of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Over the years, increased awareness of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic fractures was replaced with a decline. Conclusion: Orthopedic surgeons are more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade, but this is temporary

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada son on yılda osteoporotik kırıkların tıbbi tedavisinde ortopedi ve travmatoloji uzmanlarının farkındalığında artış olup olmadığı araştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Ocak 2002 - Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında düşük enerjili travma ile gelişen cerrahi kırıklı, daha önce osteoporoz tedavisi almayan ve sekonder osteoporoz tanıları olmayan 844 hasta (560 kadın 284 erkek; ort. yaş 78 yıl, dağılım 60-94 yıl) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Düşük enerjili travmadan sonra gelişen cerrahi kırığa osteoporoz tedavisinin başlanma oranı araştırıldı.Bulgular: Çalışmamızda yıllara göre tedaviye başlamada anlamlı bir fark saptanırken (p=0.009), tanıya göre tedaviye başlamada anlamlı bir fark görülmedi (p=0.735). 2005 ve 2008 yıllarında osteoporotik kırıkların tıbbi tedavisine başlanmada iki kat artış saptandı. Yıllar geçtikçe osteoporotik kırıkların tanı ve tedavisindeki farkındalıkta görülen artışın, yerini düşüşe bıraktığı görüldü.Sonuç: Osteoporotik kırıkların tıbbi tedavisinde ortopedi ve travmatoloji uzmanlarının farkındalığında son on yılda artış vardır, ancak bu geçicidir

🔖

Cite This Article

MORADİ, R., ATİK, O. Ş. (2022). Are orthopedic surgeons more aware of medical treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the last decade?. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 80–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/498589

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Atik OS, Gunal I, Korkusuz F. Burden of osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;443:19-24.
  2. Ataoğlu MB, Atik OŞ, Gül O, Sarıkaya B, Görmeli G, Öztürk BY, et al. A comparison of the measurements with biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in the assessment of the efficiency of osteoporosis treatment. [Article in Turkish] Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2013;24:82-6. Atik OS. Is the bone and joint decade over? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2010;21:123. Brown JP, Josse RG; Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 2002;167:S1-34. Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Luger TJ, Blauth M, Roth T. Long-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:1435-44.
  3. Gehlbach SH, Burge RT, Puleo E, Klar J. Hospital care of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2003;14:53-60.
  4. Gardner MJ, Flik KR, Mooar P, Lane JM. Improvement in the undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84:1342-8.
  5. Gosch M, Kammerlander C, Roth T, Doshi HK, Gasser RW, Blauth M. Surgeons save bones: an algorithm for orthopedic surgeons managing secondary fracture prevention. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:1101-8.