Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of early clinical results and re-tear rates of transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repairs with or without medial knots

Medial düğümlü veya düğümsüz transosseöz eşdeğeri rotator manşet onarımlarının erken klinik sonuçları ve tekrar yırtık oranlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
193–200
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Postoperatively, themean Constant score increased from 32.3±8.5 points to 84±11.6points in group A and from 31.3±9.3 points to 86.4±8.7 points ingroup B (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to compare the clinical resultsand repair integrity of two of the commonly used transosseousequivalentarthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques, which arethe knotless and the medial knotted suture bridge, for patients withfull-thickness medium to large-sized rotator cuff tears.Patients and methods: The study included 121 patients (55males, 66 females; mean age 56.7±7.3 years; range, 39 to 72 years)with cuff tears.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total, 64 shoulders were operated on usingthe conventional medial knotted suture bridge technique (groupA) and 57 shoulders were operated on using the knotless suturebridge technique (group B).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Postoperatively, themean Constant score increased from 32.3±8.5 points to 84±11.6points in group A and from 31.3±9.3 points to 86.4±8.7 points ingroup B (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the clinical resultsand repair integrity of two of the commonly used transosseousequivalentarthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques, which arethe knotless and the medial knotted suture bridge, for patients withfull-thickness medium to large-sized rotator cuff tears.Patients and methods: The study included 121 patients (55males, 66 females; mean age 56.7±7.3 years; range, 39 to 72 years)with cuff tears. In total, 64 shoulders were operated on usingthe conventional medial knotted suture bridge technique (groupA) and 57 shoulders were operated on using the knotless suturebridge technique (group B). The Constant score, visual analogscale (VAS) and active forward flexion angle were assessedpreoperatively and after a minimum of 12 months postoperatively.Postoperative rotator cuff integrity was evaluated by magneticresonance imaging (MRI) after a mean of 19±4.7 months.Results: There were no significant differences between the groupsin terms of age, gender, body mass index, and anteroposteriorextension of the tear on the sagittal MRIs. Postoperatively, themean Constant score increased from 32.3±8.5 points to 84±11.6points in group A and from 31.3±9.3 points to 86.4±8.7 points ingroup B (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, tam kat orta ile büyük boyutlu rotator manşet yırtığı olan hastalar için yaygın olarak kullanılan iki transosseöz eşdeğeri artroskopik rotator manşet onarımı tekniği olan düğümsüz ve medial düğümlü dikiş köprüsünün klinik sonuçları ve onarım bütünlüğü karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Çalışmaya manşet yırtığı olan 121 hasta (55 erkek, 66 kadın; ort. yaş 56.7±7.3 yıl; dağılım, 39-72 yıl) dahil edildi. Toplamda 64 omuz konvansiyonel medial düğümlü dikiş köprüsü tekniği (grup A) ve 57 omuz düğümsüz dikiş köprüsü tekniği (grup B) kullanılarak ameliyat edildi. Constant skoru, görsel analog ölçeği (GAÖ) ve aktif öne fleksiyon açısı ameliyat öncesinde ve ameliyattan minimum 12 ay sonra değerlendirildi. Ameliyat sonrası rotator manşet bütünlüğü ortalama 19±4.7 ay sonra manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yaş, cinsiyet, vücut kitle indeksi değeri ve sagital MRG’de yırtığın ön-arka genişliği bakımından gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık gözlenmedi. Ameliyat sonrası ortalama Constant skoru grup A’da 32.3±8.5 puandan 84±11.6 puana ve grup B’de 31.3±9.3 puandan 86.4±8.7 puana yükselirken (p

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, B., POLAT, A. E., ÇARKÇI, E., GÜRPINAR, T., ÖZTÜRKMEN, Y., TEKİN, S. B. (2022). Comparison of early clinical results and re-tear rates of transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repairs with or without medial knots. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 193–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/498410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acan AE, Hapa O, Horoz L, Kara A, Havıtçıoğlu H. Effects of a lateral row anchor position on the suture holding strength of a double-row knotless fixation in rotator cuff repair. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2018;29:46-51
  2. Lo IK, Burkhart SS. Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 2003;19:1035-42
  3. Tuoheti Y, Itoi E, Yamamoto N, Seki N, Abe H, Minagawa H, et al. Contact area, contact pressure, and pressure patterns of the tendon-bone interface after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:1869-74
  4. Dines JS, Bedi A, ElAttrache NS, Dines DM. Single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18:83-93
  5. Carbonel I, Martínez AA, Aldea E, Ripalda J, Herrera A. Outcome and structural integrity of rotator cuff after arthroscopic treatment of large and massive tears with double row technique: a 2-year followup. Adv Orthop 2013;2013:914148
  6. Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Dines JS, Blackburn A, Crues J, Tibone JE. Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1496-503
  7. Imam MA, Abdelkafy A2. Outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge double row rotator cuff repair: a prospective study and short-term results. SICOT J 2016;2:7
  8. Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:461-8
  9. Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Part II: Biomechanical assessment for a footprintrestoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:469-76
  10. Leek BT, Robertson C, Mahar A, Pedowitz RA. Comparison of mechanical stability in double-row rotator cuff repairs between a knotless transtendon construct versus the addition of medial knots. Arthroscopy 2010;26:S127-33
  11. Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J, Van Thiel GS, Romeo AA, Verma NN, et al. Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a systematic review on the biomechanical importance of tying the medial row. Arthroscopy 2013;29:377-86
  12. Smith GCS, Bouwmeester TM, Lam PH. Knotless double-row SutureBridge rotator cuff repairs have improved self-reinforcement compared with doublerow SutureBridge repairs w