SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2002 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 124

Students' Understanding of Higher Order Concepts in Chemistry: Facusing on Chemical Equilibrium

Öğrencilerin Kimyasal Denge Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgıları

Esin PEKMEZ ŞAHİN
Pages
61–70
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes with some implications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most research shows that students have some misunderstandings and their ideas are difficult to change.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We educators should know what children have in their minds in order to find suitable teaching strategies which might be used to help to develop students' understandings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes with some implications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Most research shows that students have some misunderstandings and their ideas are difficult to change. We educators should know what children have in their minds in order to find suitable teaching strategies which might be used to help to develop students' understandings. Understanding their ideas is also necessary for the development and improvement of practice in science education. In this paper, the issue of changing children's ideas will be discussed briefly; and, then a review of the literature on the misconceptions held by students on the topic of chemical equilibrium, which is one of the most difficult areas for students to understand will be made. The article concludes with some implications.

Özet

Çoğu araştırma öğrencilerin kavram yanılgılarının olduğunu ve bu yanlış algılamaların değişmesinin zor olduğunu göstermiştir. Biz eğitimciler öğrencilerin anlamalarına yardımcı olacak uygun öğretme stratejilerini saptayabilmek için onların kafalarında neler olduğunu bilmemiz gerekir.Bu fen eğitimi için de gereklidir. Bu makalede, öğrencilerin sahip olduktan fikirlerin değişmesi konusu tartışılacak ve anlaşılması çok zor konulardan biri olan kimyasal denge konusunda öğrencilerin sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları hakkında bir derleme sunulacaktır. Makale konuya ilişkin, uygulamaya yönelik bazı önerilerde de bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, E. P. (2022). Students' Understanding of Higher Order Concepts in Chemistry: Facusing on Chemical Equilibrium. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 124, 61–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/498090

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Banerjee, A. C. (1991). Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 487-494.
  2. Banarjee, A., C. & Power, C. N. (1991). The development of modules for the teaching of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 355-362.
  3. Ben-Zvi, R.; Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students' visualisation of a chemical reaction. Education in Chemistry, July, 117-120.
  4. Bergquist, W., & Heikkinen, H. (1990). Students ideas regarding chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(12), 1000-1003.
  5. Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (1985a). Children's ideas in science. Open University Press,
  6. Milton Keynes. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985b), Some features of children's ideas and their implications for leaching. In Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (eds.) Children's ideas in science education. Open University Press,
  7. Milton Keyness. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: research into children's ideas. London: Routledge. Garnett, Patrick, J., Garnett, Pamela, J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
  8. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982), Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
  9. Goddart, F. W., & James, E. (1969). The elements of physical chemistry. UK: Longman. Gorodelsky, M. & Hoz, R. (1985). Changes in the group cognitive structure of some chemical equilibrium concepts following a university course in general chemistry. Science Education, 69(2), 185-199.
  10. Hackling, M. H,, & Garnett, P. J. (1985) Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. Eruopean Journal of Science Education, 7 (2), 205- 214. Hanieed, H., Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1993). Facilitating conceptual change in chemical equilibrium using a CAI strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 221-230.
  11. Herron, J. D. (1996). The chemistry classroom. Library of Congress, Cataloging-in-Publication Data, Washington. Johnson, P. (1997). Understanding chemical change: what does it take? Submitted for publication. Johnson, P. (1998a). Children's understanding of changes of state involving gas state, Part 1: boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (5), 567-583. Joh