SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2006 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 139

Yabancı Dilde O Dile Uygun Yapılan Hatalar: Bir Yaratıcılık Örneği

Intralingual Morphological Errors in FLL: A Case of Creativity

Mehmet ÇELİK
Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

One main conclusion reached is that advanced learners can attain a level of competence which would render them having certain native speaker qualities in certain domains of language, i.e. lexical competence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article reports on an investigation into the intralingual errors in word derivation and inflection committed in writing and speaking.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article argues that some intralingual errors can be considered "creative".
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One main conclusion reached is that advanced learners can attain a level of competence which would render them having certain native speaker qualities in certain domains of language, i.e. lexical competence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article reports on an investigation into the intralingual errors in word derivation and inflection committed in writing and speaking. The article argues that some intralingual errors can be considered "creative". One main conclusion reached is that advanced learners can attain a level of competence which would render them having certain native speaker qualities in certain domains of language, i.e. lexical competence.

Özet

Bu makale, yabancı dil öğrenimi sürecinde, yazılı ve sözlü sınavlarda öğrenilen dilin kurallarından hareketle yapılan sözcük türerimi hataları üzerine bir araştırmadır. Makale bu şekilde yapılan bazı hataların "yaratıcı" olarak kabul edilmesi gerektiğini savunur. Ulaşılan önemli sonuçlardan biri, ileri düzeyde yabancı dil bilen kullanıcıların, sözcük yetisi gibi dilin belli alanlarında, anadil kullanıcılarına benzer özellikler taşıyacak düzeye gelebildikleridir..

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, M. (2022). Yabancı Dilde O Dile Uygun Yapılan Hatalar: Bir Yaratıcılık Örneği. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 139, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/498033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181-206.
  2. Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (2004). Talking, creating: interactional language, creativity and context. Applied Linguistics, 25/1: 62-88.
  3. Collentine, J. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227-248.
  4. Corder, P. (1967). The significance of errors. In J.C. Richards (ed.) Error analysis: perspectives on second language acquisition, (pp. 19-30) London: Longman. Corder, P. (1971). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. In J.C. Richards (ed.) Error analysis: perspectives on second language acquisition, (pp. 158-171) London: Longman. Henriksen, B. (1999) Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303-317.
  5. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347-386.
  6. Jain, M.P. (1974). Error analysis: source, cause and significance. In J.C. Richards (ed) Error analysis: perspectives on second language acquisition, (pp.189-215) London: Longman. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, (2001).
  7. Hornby, A.S. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Richards, J.C. (1974). (ed.) Error analysis: perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman. Richards, J.C. (1971). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. In J.C. Richards (ed) Error analysis: perspectives on second language acquisition, (pp. 172-188) London: Longman.