Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2006 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 139

Dil Bölümlerindeki Hazırlık Öğrencilerinin İhtiyaç Analizi Çalışması

A Study for the Needs Analysis of Preparatory Students at Language Departments

Pages
49–55
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Before administering the questionnaire to the students and to the teaching staff the pilot administration was done to see the possible problems which might occur.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at finding the needs of the preparatory school students' at the departments of Language at Hacettepe University by informal interviews and questionnaires in order to see whether the existing syllabus meets the needs of the students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To determine valid and reliable results, the questionnaire was administered to 103 fourth grade Language departments students (American Culture and Literature, English Language and Literature, Linguistics, Translation and Interpretation, English Language Teaching) and 18 teaching staff at these departments at Hacettepe University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Before administering the questionnaire to the students and to the teaching staff the pilot administration was done to see the possible problems which might occur.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims at finding the needs of the preparatory school students' at the departments of Language at Hacettepe University by informal interviews and questionnaires in order to see whether the existing syllabus meets the needs of the students. To determine valid and reliable results, the questionnaire was administered to 103 fourth grade Language departments students (American Culture and Literature, English Language and Literature, Linguistics, Translation and Interpretation, English Language Teaching) and 18 teaching staff at these departments at Hacettepe University. Informal interviews were done by the teaching staff. These two questionnaires are parallel to each other so that the results can be compared to identify the needs of the students. Before administering the questionnaire to the students and to the teaching staff the pilot administration was done to see the possible problems which might occur.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Dil Bölümü hazırlık öğrencilerinin ihtiyaçlarını belirlemek ve mevcut programın bu ihtiyaçlara cevap verip vermediğini, ihtiyaç analizi anketi ve informal görüşmelerle ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Geçerli ve güvenilir sonuçlar elde etmek için anket Hacettepe Üniversitesi 103 dil bölümü dördüncü sınıf öğrencisi (Amerikan Kültürü ve Edebiyatı, ingiliz Dil Bilimi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği, ingiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı, ingilizce Mütercim Tercümanlık) ve 18 öğretim elemanına uygulanmıştır. Öğretim elemanları ile informal görüşmeler de yapılmıştır. Bu iki anket de öğrencilerin ihtiyaçlarını belirlemek üzere, verilerin karşılaştırılması için paralel hazırlanmıştır. Anket, öğrencilere ve öğretim elemanlarına uygulanmadan önce olabilecek problemleri görebilmek için pilot denemesi yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAVİL, Z. M. (2022). Dil Bölümlerindeki Hazırlık Öğrencilerinin İhtiyaç Analizi Çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 139, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/497930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Allan, C. Ornstein & Francis P. Hunkis. (1988)
  2. Curriculum, Foundations, Principles and Issues. Prentice Hall: New Jersey. Brown, H. Douglas.(2001) Teaching By Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedogogy. Longman Press:London Brown, J.D.(1989) Language Program Evaluation. CUP: London Celce Marianne, Murcia (1991) Teaching English As a Second or Foreign Language. Heinle and Heinle Press:USA Chastain, Kenneth (1988) Developing Second Language Skills. Harcourt Brace Javanovich Press:USA Cunningsworth, Alan. (1988) Evaluating and Selecting EFL Teaching Materials. Heinemann Press:
  3. London Davis, Rendall (2000) Six Pioneers' Perspectives on Developing Successful Materials. ELT Journal 1/4 Dubin, Fraida & Olshtain Elite (1988) Course Design Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning. CUP: U.S.A Ellis, R. (1997) The Emprical Evaluation of Language Teaching Materials. ELT Journal 51/1 ELT Documents: 126(1987)ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development. Modern English Publications: London Harmer, Jeremy. (2001) English Language Teaching. Parson Press:
  4. London. Johnson, Robert Keith (1989) The Second Language Curriculum. CUP.:Cambridge Kitao, K & Kitaok (1997) Selecting and Developing Teaching/ Learning Materials. TESL Journal 4/4 Munby, John.(1985) Communicative Syllabus Design. CUP: London Nunan, David. (1993) Second Language Teaching and Learning. Canada Press:
  5. Canada. Olivia, Peter F. (1997) Curriculum Development. Longman Press:
  6. U.S.A. Richards, Jack C. & Rodgers Theodere J. (1990) Approaches and Methods In Language Teaching. CUP: London Richards, Jack C. (2001) Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. CUP: U.S.A. Robinson,C. (1991) ESP Today: A Practioner's Guide. U.S.A:Prentice Hall Tomlinson, B. (Ed).(2000) Materials Development in Language Teaching. ELT Journal 54/2 Tavil, M. (2003) A study For The Needs Analysis of The English Preparatory Students at Hacettepe University. Published Doctoral Dissertation, University of Gazi, Ankara.