SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2008 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 148

The Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel, Chi-Square and Logistik Regression Techniques for Identifying Differential Item Functioning

Değişen Madde Fonksiyonunu Belirlemede Mantel-Haenszel, Ki-Kare ve Lojistik Regresyon Tekniklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Tuncay ÖĞRETMEN
Nuri DOĞAN
Pages
100–112
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study indicated that these techniques provided many similarities and differences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine to similarity and differences in practice by comparing Chi-square, the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression techniques, and differential item functioning (DIF) determination techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out with a sample of 3345. students selected from approximately 600.000 students who Participated Selection and Placement Examination for Secondary Education Institutions in 2003.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study indicated that these techniques provided many similarities and differences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine to similarity and differences in practice by comparing Chi-square, the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression techniques, and differential item functioning (DIF) determination techniques. The study was carried out with a sample of 3345. students selected from approximately 600.000 students who Participated Selection and Placement Examination for Secondary Education Institutions in 2003. The data of study was composed of students' answers to science sub-test in Selection and Placement Examination for Secondary Education. The DIF analysis was carried out with gender groups only. The results of the study indicated that these techniques provided many similarities and differences.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, değişen madde fonksiyonunu (DMF) belirleme tekniklerinden kikare, Mantel-Haenszel ve lojistik regresyon tekniklerini karşılaştırarak uygulamada ortaya çıkan benzerlik veya farklılıklarını belirlemektir. Çalışma, 2003 yılında Ortaöğretim Kurumları Seçme ve Yerleştirme Smavı'na (OKÖSYS) katılan yaklaşık 600.000 öğrenci arasından yansız olarak seçilen 3345 öğrenciden oluşan bir örneklem üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın verileri, OKÖSYS fen bilgisi alt testine öğrencilerin verdiği yanıtlardan oluşmaktadır. Değişen madde fonksiyonu analizi sadece cinsiyet grupları üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın sonuçları, söz konusu tekniklerin bazı açılardan birbirlerine göre benzerlik ve farklılıklar sağladığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞRETMEN, T., DOĞAN, N. (2022). The Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel, Chi-Square and Logistik Regression Techniques for Identifying Differential Item Functioning. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 148, 100–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/497871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adams, R. ]., ve Rowe, K. J. (1988). Item bias. In J.P.Keeves (ed.) Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  2. Camilli, G. (1979). A critique of the chi-square method for assessing item bias. Unpublished paper Laboratory of Educational Research, University of Colorado. Camilli, G., Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifiying biased test items. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Crocker, L., ve Algina, J.(1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando: Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Devine, P. J., ve Raju N. S. (1982). Extent of overlap among four item bias methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42,1049-1066.
  3. Doğan, N., ve Öğretmen, T. (2006). Madde yanlılığını belirleme teknikleri arasında bir karşılaştırma. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 23, 94-105
  4. Dorans, N. J., ve Kulick, E. M. (1983). Assessing unexpected differential item performance of female candidates on SAT and TSWE forms administered in December 1977(ETS Research Report RR-83-9), Princeton: New Jersey. Dorans, N. J., ve Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland, ve H. Wainer, (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning (pp. 35-66), New Jersey: USA. Gierl, M., Khaliq, S. N., Bougthon, K. (1999). Gender differential item functioning in mathematics and science: Prevalence and policy implications. Paper presented at the semposium entitled "Improviming large - scale assessment in education" at the Anual Meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Canada, June, 1999.
  5. Gierl, M., Jodoin, G. M. & Ackerman, T. A. (2000).
  6. Performance of Mantel-Haenszel, Simultaneous Item Bias Test, and Logistic Regression when the proportion of DIF items is Large. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American educational Research Association (AERA). New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Erişim 17 Temmuz 2006, from the Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation (CRAME) website: http://www.education.ualberta.ca/educ/psych/crame/
  7. Gomez-Benito, J. ve Navas-Ara, M. J. (2000).
  8. A comparison of Ki-kare, RFA and IRT based procedures in the detection of DIF. Quality ve Quantity 34:17-31.
  9. Swaminathan, H., ve Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361-370.
  10. Hambleton, R K., Swaminathan, H. ve Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage Publi