SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2009 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 153

Çatışma çözümü ve akran arabuluculuk eğitiminin öğrencilerin empati becerileri üzerindeki etkileri

The effects of conflict resolution and peer mediation education on students' empathy skills

Abbas TÜRNÜKLÜ
Tarkan KAÇMAZ
Selma GÜRLER
Alper KALENDER
Feza ZENGİN
Burçak ŞEVKIN
Pages
15–24
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results support the assumption that the CRPM training program might be effective in increasing the elementary school students’ levels of empathy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of a Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation (CRPM) training program on the 10-11 year-old elementary school students’ empathy skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group included 585 students; 336 in the experiment and 249 in the control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results support the assumption that the CRPM training program might be effective in increasing the elementary school students’ levels of empathy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of a Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation (CRPM) training program on the 10-11 year-old elementary school students’ empathy skills. The research was carried out using a pre-test/post-test, quasi-experimental design. The study group included 585 students; 336 in the experiment and 249 in the control group. Statistically significant differences were found between the pre-test and post-test means of the experiment group. There was a significant difference between the post-test scores of the boys in the experiment and the control group although no such difference was found among the girls who participated in the study. The gain score means of the experiment and the control group, and of the boys’ in the experiment and the control group were significantly different. These results support the assumption that the CRPM training program might be effective in increasing the elementary school students’ levels of empathy.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Anlaşmazlık Çözümü ve Akran Arabuluculuk Eğitimi programının 10-11 yaş ilköğretim öğrencilerinin empati becerileri üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Araştırma öntest-sontest, yarı-deneysel bir desen kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma grubu, 336’sı deney grubunda ve 249 kontrol grubunda olmak üzere 585 öğrenciden oluşmuştur. Deney grubunun öntest ve sontest sonuçları arasında istatistiki olarak anlamlı farklar bulunmuştur. Deney ve kontrol grubunda yer alan erkek öğrencilerin öntest ve sontest puanları arasında anlamlı farklar bulunmasına karşın, kızlar arasında böyle bir fark görülmemiştir. Deney ve kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin ve yalnız erkek öğrencilerin kazanç puanlarında anlamlı farklar bulunmuştur. Araştırmanın sonuçları Anlaşmazlık Çözümü ve Akran Arabuluculuk Eğitimi programının öğrencilerin empati düzeylerini artırmada etkili olduğu varsayımını desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRNÜKLÜ, A., KAÇMAZ, T., GÜRLER, S., KALENDER, A., ZENGİN, F., ŞEVKIN, B. (2022). Çatışma çözümü ve akran arabuluculuk eğitiminin öğrencilerin empati becerileri üzerindeki etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 153, 15–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/497815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bodine, J. R., Crawford, K. D., & Schrumpf, F. (2002a). Creating peaceable school: A comprehensive program for teaching conflict resolution: Program guide (2nd Ed.). Illinois: Research Press.
  2. Bodine, J. R., Crawford, K. D., & Schrumpf, F. (2002b). Creating peaceable school: A comprehensive program for teaching conflict resolution: Student manual (2nd Ed.). Illinois: Research Press.
  3. Cohen, R. (1995). Peer mediation in schools: Students resolving conflict. New Jersey: Good Year Books. Farrell, A. D., Meyer, A. L., Kung, E. M., & Sullivan, T. N. (2001). Development and evaluation of schoolbased violence prevention programs. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(2), 207-221.
  4. Gehlbach, H. (2004). A new perspective on perspective taking: A multidimensional approach to conceptualising and aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 207-234.
  5. Girard, K., & Koch, J. S. (1996). Conflict resolution in the school: A manual for educators. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers.
  6. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson. R. (1994). Effects of conflict resolution training on elementary school students. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(6), 803-818.
  7. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1995a). Teaching students to be peacemakers. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1995b). Our mediation notebook (Third Ed.). Edina MN: Interaction Book Co. Lupton-Smith, H. S., & Carruthers, W. L. (1996). Conflict resolution as peer mediation: Programs for elementary, middle, and high school students. School Counselor, 43 (5), 374-392.
  8. Oswald, P. A. (1996). The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(5), 613-623.
  9. Richardson, D., R., Green, L., L. & Lago, T. (1998). The relationship between perspective-taking and nonaggressive responding in the face of an attack. Journal of Personality, 66(2), 235-256.
  10. Schrumpf, F. Crawford, K. D., & Bodine, J. R. (1997a). Peer mediation: Conflict resolution in schools: Program guide. Illinois: Research Press.
  11. Schrumpf, F. Crawford, K. D., & Bodine, J. R. (1997b). Peer mediation: Conflict resolution in schools: Student manual. Illinois: Research Press.
  12. Schwebel, M. (2006). Realistic empathy and active nonviolence confront political reality. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 191-208.
  13. Simpson, C. (1998). Coping through conflict resolution and peer mediation. New York: Rosen Publishing Group. Teolis, B. (1998). Ready to use conflict resolution activities: F