SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2015 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 179

Learning approaches of successful students and factors affecting their learning approaches

Başarılı öğrencilerin öğrenme yaklaşımları ve öğrenme yaklaşımlarını etkileyen faktörler

Nuray SENEMOĞLU
Dilek BEYAZTAŞ İLHAN
Pages
193–216
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, preparation courses and group of friends thave significant influence on how students internalize strategiclearning approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this descriptive study is to identify learningapproaches (deep, surface, or strate gic) among successfulundergraduate students and the factors that affect and shape theirlearning approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample comprised 90 freshmanstudents who were ranked in the top one percent portion of the 2013University Placement Exam (UPE) in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, preparation courses and group of friends thave significant influence on how students internalize strategiclearning approaches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive study is to identify learningapproaches (deep, surface, or strate gic) among successfulundergraduate students and the factors that affect and shape theirlearning approaches. The study sample comprised 90 freshmanstudents who were ranked in the top one percent portion of the 2013University Placement Exam (UPE) in Turkey. Students werevariously attending faculties of education, law or medicine and weregrouped in subject areas of Literacy- Social (LS), Literacy-Math (LM),and Math- Science (MS). Data was obtained via semi structuredinterviews with students and recorded on a form developed by theresearchers. We found that students tend to be inclined to a surfacelearning approach, their teacher has a rote learning educationunderstanding - the content of the course is quantitative, and examsare multiple choice or use a true/false system. However, they tend tochoose a deep learning strategy when their teacher has both researchand interrogation based expectations, the content of the course isqualitative, and the exam style is writing an essay or of a fill in thegaps type. Moreover, preparation courses and group of friends thave significant influence on how students internalize strategiclearning approaches.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Lisans Yerleştirme Sınavında (LYS) Türkçe -Sosyal (TS), Türkçe -Matematik (TM) ve Matematik-Fen (MF)alanında ilk yüzde bir dilimde bulunan öğrencilerin öğrenmeyaklaşımlarını (derinlemesine, yüzeysel, stratejik) ve bu öğrenmeyaklaşımlarına etki eden faktörleri belirlemektir. Çalışma betimselbir araştırmadır. Bu araştırmanın örneklemini, Lisans YerleştirmeSınavı (2013) TM, TS ve MF alanlarından ilk yüzde bir dilimdenöğrenci alan Türkçe Öğretmenliği, Hukuk ve Tıp Fakültesi 1. sınıföğrencilerinden 90 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileriaraştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeformu ile elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmenlerinezbere dayalı beklentilerinin olması, ders türünün sözel olması,sınavların çoktan seçmeli test ya da doğru -yanlış türünde olmasıdurumunda öğrencilerin yüzeysel öğr enme yaklaşımınayöneldikleri, öğretmenlerin araştırma ve sorgulamaya dayalıbeklentilerinin olması, ders türünün sayısal olması, sınavlarınklasik ya da boşluk doldurma türünde olması durumunda iseöğrencilerin derinlemesine öğrenme yaklaşımına yöneldikle ritespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca dershanelerin ve arkadaş çevresininöğrencilerin stratejik öğrenme yaklaşımını benimsemeleriüzerinde etkisi olduğu da tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SENEMOĞLU, N., İLHAN, D. B. (2022). Learning approaches of successful students and factors affecting their learning approaches. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 179, 193–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/497804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Bernardo. A. B. I. (2003). Approaches to learning and academic achievement of Filipino students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 101 -114. Biggs, J. (1979). Ind ividual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381 -394. Biggs, J. B. (1996). Aproaches to learning of asian students a multiple paradox. J. Pandey, D. Sinha, ve D. P. S. Bhawuk, (Eds.) Asian Contributions to Cross -Cultural Psychology içinde (s.180-200). New Delhi: Sage Publications. Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: a matter of style or approach? R. J. Sternberg ve L. F. Zhang (Eds.) Perspective on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles içinde (s.73-102). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Biggs, J. ve Tang, C. (2007). The Society for research into higher education teaching for quality le arning at university. USA: McGraw Hill. Chin, C. ve Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109- 138. Curzon, L. B. (2004). Teaching in further education an outline of principles and practise. New York: Continuum. Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton- Lewis, G., Campbell, J. ve Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and aproaches to learning, The Journal of Educa tional Research, 93 (4), 262-270.
  2. Eggen, P. D. ve Kauchak, D. P. (2006). Strategies and models for teachers. teaching content and thinking skills. Boston: Pearson Education. Ekinci, N. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme - öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  3. Ankara Elstad, E., Christophersen, K. ve Turmo, A. (2012). The Influence of Parents and Teachers on the Deep Learning Approach of Pupils in Norwegian Upper - Secondary Schools. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(1), 26. Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M. ve Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying approach to studying. Higher Education, 8(4), 365-380.
  4. Entwistle, N. J. (1995). Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations. Educational Psychologist, 30(1), 47- 54. Entwistle, N., McCune, V. ve Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: analytic abstractions and everyday experience. Sternberg, R. J. ve Zhang, L. F. (Eds.). Perspective on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles iç