SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2010 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 158

Liderlik uygulamaları ölçeği'nin Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması

Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish

Mustafa YAVUZ
Pages
143–157
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, it was thought that Turkish adaptation process of the scale was completed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this research is determined as adapting the Leadership Practice Inventory developed by Kouzes & Posner (2003) to Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Working group of the research consist of 436 teachers chosen by using the random sampling method among the teachers working in 2009-2010 educational years in Konya/Turkey. 194 of the teachers constituting the working group are female and 242 of them are male.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, it was thought that Turkish adaptation process of the scale was completed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim of this research is determined as adapting the Leadership Practice Inventory developed by Kouzes & Posner (2003) to Turkish. Working group of the research consist of 436 teachers chosen by using the random sampling method among the teachers working in 2009-2010 educational years in Konya/Turkey. 194 of the teachers constituting the working group are female and 242 of them are male. Average working year of them are 15 years. During the adaptation of the scale, it was first translated into Turkish by English teaching experts; then the Turkish text was retranslated into English, compared with the original text and found to be identical with it. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted. Reliability of the scale was tested by using Cronbach a, Spearman Brown, Gutmann Split-Half techniques and corrected item-total correlations, the values related to differences of 27 percentage lower-higher groups. As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, it was thought that Turkish adaptation process of the scale was completed.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; Kouzes & Posner (2003) tarafından geliştirilen Leadership Practices Inventory’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, 2009-2010 eğitim öğretim yılında Konya/Türkiye’de görev yapan öğretmenler arasından tesadüfî örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 436 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma grubunda yer alan öğretmenlerin 194’ü kadın ve 242’si erkektir. Öğretmenlerin mesleki kıdemi ortalama 15 yıldır. Ölçeğin uyarlama sürecinde öncelikle Türkçe’ye çevirisi yapılmıştır. Ardından ölçeğin geçerliğini sağlamak amacıyla, dilsel eşdeğerliği test edilmiş, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin güvenirliği ise, Cronbach α, Spearman Brown, Gutmann Split-Half teknikleri, Düzeltilmiş Madde-toplam Korelasyonları ve %27’lik Alt-üst Grup Farkına İlişkin t Değerleri hesaplanarak sağlanmıştır. Bu işlemlerden sonra ölçeğin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVUZ, M. (2022). Liderlik uygulamaları ölçeği'nin Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 158, 143–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/497788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arnold, J.A., Arad,S.,. Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: Tine construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior,; 21, 249-269.
  2. Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bakay, E. & Kalem, G. (2009). Türk Eğitim Sistemi ve Etkili Okul Göstergeleri Project Based School Management Project Number: 142320-LLP-1-2008-1-TR-COMENIUS-CMP. Bartell, C. (1990). Outstanding secondary principals reflect on instructional leadership. The High School Journal, 73(2), 118-128.
  3. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1995) The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), Redwood City: Mind Garden. Blase, J., & Blase, J. R. (1994). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  4. Bilgen, N. (1990). Örgiit İklimi. Ankara:
  5. TODAIE. Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass' 1985 conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468-478.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  7. PegemA Yayıncılık. Büyiiköztürle, S., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., & Özkahveci, Ö. (2004). Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçegı'nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalısması. Kuram ve Uygulamada EgitimBilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
  8. Car less, S. A., Wearing A.J. & Mann, L. (2000) A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of B usiness and Psychology, 14 (3), 389-405.
  9. Cheng, E. W. L. (2001). SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious model testing for management devolopment research. Journal of Management Development, 20(7), 650-667
  10. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership iri organizations: perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15 (5),439-452.
  11. Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (1999). Shaping school culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Donaldson, G. A. (2006). Cultivation leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, & practice (Second ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  12. Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  13. Johnson, J.F., Jr., & Asera, R„ (Eds.) (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty, urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc., Washington DC. Austin, T