SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2010 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 155

Akran öğretimi ve mikro öğretimin Fizik öğretmen adaylarının öğretme becerilerine etkileri

Effects of peer teaching and microteaching on teaching skills of pre-service physics teachers

İ.Ahmet ŞEN
Pages
78–88
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study indicated that peer teaching/microteaching applications positively contributed to the teaching skills of the pre-service physics teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effects of peer teaching and microteaching on pre-service physics teachers’ teaching skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Peer and microteaching applications are conducted with thirty-nine pre-service physics teachers during the academic years 2005–2006 and 2006–2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study indicated that peer teaching/microteaching applications positively contributed to the teaching skills of the pre-service physics teachers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005–2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the effects of peer teaching and microteaching on pre-service physics teachers’ teaching skills. Peer and microteaching applications are conducted with thirty-nine pre-service physics teachers during the academic years 2005–2006 and 2006–2007. The data were collected through the “Teacher Performance Evaluation Form” which was particulary developed for this study. The findings of the study indicated that peer teaching/microteaching applications positively contributed to the teaching skills of the pre-service physics teachers.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, akran öğretimi ve mikro öğretim yönteminin fizik öğretmen adaylarının öğretme becerileri üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Akran ve mikro öğretim uygulamaları 2005– 2006 ve 2006–2007 akademik yıllarında 39 katılımcıdan oluşan grupta uygulanmıştır. Veriler, bu çalışma için geliştirilmiş “Öğretmen Performansı Değerlendirme Ölçeği” ile elde edilmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, akran ve mikro öğretim yönteminin fizik öğretmen adaylarının öğretme becerilerine olumlu yönde katkı sağladığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, İ. (2022). Akran öğretimi ve mikro öğretimin Fizik öğretmen adaylarının öğretme becerilerine etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 155, 78–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/497785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Allen, D., & Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Reading. Massachusetts: Addison & Wesley. Cambridge Public Schools (n.d.). Teacher performance evaluation form. Retrieved April 20. 2009, http://www. cpsd.us/Web/HR/TeacherEvaluationFORM.pdf. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression / correlation analysis to the analysis of behavioral science. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates. Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1989). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. Columbus:Merrill. Cornford, I. R. (1991). Microteaching skill generalization and transfer: Training pre-service teachers in introductory lesson skills. Teaching and Teacher Education. 7(1), 25–56.
  2. Denight, J. A., & Gall. M. D. (1989. March). Effects of enthusiasm training on teachers and students at the high school level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.San Francisco. Evertson, C. M., Hawley, W. D., & Zlotnik, M. (1985). Making a difference in educational quality through teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2-12.
  3. Frye, H. (1988). The principal’s role in teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 54-58.
  4. Goodman, J. (1986). University education courses and the professional preparation of teachers: A descriptive analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(4), 341–353.
  5. Hargie, O. D. W., Dickson. D. A., & Tittmar, H. G. (1978). Mini-teaching: An extension of the microteaching format. British Journal of Teacher Education. 4 (2), 113–118. Higher Education Council (n.d). Aday öğretmen kılavuzu. Retrieved April 17. 2007. from http://www.yok. gov.tr/egitim/ogretmen/aday_ogretmen/adayogr.html Jackson Public School District Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook (n.d.). Retrieved April 17. 2009,from http://www.nctq.org/evaluation_handbook/81-07.pdf.
  6. Kazu, H. (1996). Öğretmen yetiştirmede mikro öğretim yönteminin etkinliği (Fırat Üniversitesi Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi örneği). Unpublished dissertation. Fırat University. Elazığ. Turkey. Klinzing, H. G. (2002). Wie effektiv ist microteaching? Ein überblick über fünfunddreißig jahre forschung.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. 48 (2), 194–214.
  7. Klinzing, H. G., & Folden. R. E. (1991). The development of the microteaching movement in Europe. ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 352 341. Leith, G. O. M. (1982). The influence of personality on learning to teach: Effects and delayed effects ofmicroteaching. Educational Review. 34 (3), 195–204. List