SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2010 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 156

The comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression techniques in determining the differential item functioning

Değişen madde fonksiyonunu belirlemede Mantel–Haenszel ve lojistik regresyon tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması

Nuri DOĞAN
Hülya KELECİOĞLU
Bilge GÖK
Pages
3–16
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the light of the findings, it was found that there was a low level of accordance between MH and LR methods in Science and maths sub test according to gender and school type.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to compare Mantel-Haenszel (MH) and logistic regression (LR) techniques which are used to determine the differential item functioning (DIF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with this purpose, Maths and Science sub tests of Secondary Schools Exam (SSE) were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the light of the findings, it was found that there was a low level of accordance between MH and LR methods in Science and maths sub test according to gender and school type.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to compare Mantel-Haenszel (MH) and logistic regression (LR) techniques which are used to determine the differential item functioning (DIF). In accordance with this purpose, Maths and Science sub tests of Secondary Schools Exam (SSE) were used. It was examined whether the functions of test items varied according to gender and school type. In the light of the findings, it was found that there was a low level of accordance between MH and LR methods in Science and maths sub test according to gender and school type.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, değişen madde fonksiyonunu belirlemede kullanılan Mantel- Haenszel (MH) ve lojistik regresyon (LR) tekniklerini karşılaştırmaktır. Bu amaçla araştırmada, 2005 yılında yapılan Ortaöğretim Kurumları Sınavı (OKS)’nın matematik ve fen bilgisi alt testleri kullanılmıştır. Test maddelerinin cinsiyet ve okul türüne göre fonksiyonlarının farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, MH ve LR teknikleri arasında matematik ve fen bilgisi alt testlerinde cinsiyet ve okul türü değişkenlerine göre genel olarak düşük düzeyde bir uyum görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, N., KELECİOĞLU, H., GÖK, B. (2022). The comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression techniques in determining the differential item functioning. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 156, 3–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/497784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Agresti, A. (1984). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Bertrand, R. & Boiteau, N. (2003). Comparing the stability of IRT-Based and non IRT-based DIF methods in different cultural contexts using TIMSS data (Eric Document Reproduction No.ED 476 924). Camilli, G. & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. London: Sage Publications. Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. & Hambleton, R. K. (1991). Examination of various influences on the Mantel-Haenszel statistic. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. & Hambleton, R. K. (1993). The effects of purification of the matching criterion on the identification of DIF using the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(4), 269–279.
  2. Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. (1998). Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 17(1), 31–44.
  3. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Dorans, N. J. & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35–66)Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fidalgo, A. M., Mellenbergh, G. J. & Muñiz, J. (2000). Spain effects of amount of DIF, test length,and purification. Methods of Psychological Research, 5(3) 43-53.
  4. Gierl, M. J., Jodoin, M. & Ackerman T. (2000). Performance of mantel-haenszel, simultaneous item bias test and logistic regression when the proportion of dif items is large. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Gierl, M. H., Khaliq, S. N. & Boughton, K. (1999, June). Gender differential item functioning in mathematics and science: prevalence and policy implications. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Canada. Gierl, M. J., Rogers, W. T. & Klinger, D. A. (1999). Statistical and judgmental reviews to identify and interpret translation differential item functioning. Alberta Journal of Educational Research,45(4), 353-376.
  5. Greer, T. G. (2004). Detection of differential item functioning (DIF) on the SATV: A comparison of four methods: Mantel-haenszel, logistic regression, simultaneous item bias and likelihood ratio test. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Houston. Hambleton, K. R. &