SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162

Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının Evrim teorisi'ne ve bilim doğasına bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma

An assessment into pre-service biology teachers' approaches to the theory of evolution and nature of science

İREZ. Serhat
Çiçek Dilek ÖZYERAL BAKANAY
Pages
39–55
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, a detailed analysis of participants’ accounts with regard to the nature of science and the examination of the association of these accounts with their views about the theory of evolution implied a potential relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores how a group of pre-service biology teachers view the nature of evolutionary theory and how their views about nature of science affect their approaches to the theory of evolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total number of 75 pre-service teachers participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, a detailed analysis of participants’ accounts with regard to the nature of science and the examination of the association of these accounts with their views about the theory of evolution implied a potential relationship.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study explores how a group of pre-service biology teachers view the nature of evolutionary theory and how their views about nature of science affect their approaches to the theory of evolution. A total number of 75 pre-service teachers participated in the study. Participants’ perceptions of nature of science and the theory of evolution were assessed by a questionnaire and a semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. The results revealed that the participants generally had negative attitudes toward the nature and status of the theory of evolution. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of participants’ accounts with regard to the nature of science and the examination of the association of these accounts with their views about the theory of evolution implied a potential relationship.

Özet

Bu çalışma biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının evrim teorisini nasıl algıladıklarını ve bilimin doğasına ilişkin görüşlerin bu algıyı nasıl etkilediğini araştırmaktadır. Çalışmaya toplam 75 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Katılımcıların evrim teorisi ve bilimin doğasına ilişkin görüşleri bir anket ve yüzyüze yapılan yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile araştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar katılımcıların genel olarak evrim teorisinin doğası ve status konusunda olumsuz görüşlere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Katılımcıların bilimin doğasına ilişkin görüşleri ve bu görüşlerin evrim teorisine bakışları üzerine etkisi üzerine yapılan detaylı çözümlemeler, bu iki bilgi alanı arasında potansiyel bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Serhat, İ., BAKANAY, Ç. D. Ö. (2022). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının Evrim teorisi'ne ve bilim doğasına bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162, 39–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/497736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2001). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS), Costa Mesa, CA. Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 153– 166. Abell, S. K. & Smith, D.C. (1994). What is science?: Pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 475-487.
  2. Aikenhead, G. & Ryan, A. (1992). The Development of a new instrument: Views on science-technology- society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477-491. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., Letts, W., & Shipman, H. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 340-362.
  4. Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  5. Cobern, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31. 583-590.
  6. Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429-445.
  7. Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (1997). (2005). Student’s perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378-391.
  8. Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G., Sundberg, M., & Dini., M. (1992). Students’ conceptions of natural selection: A replication study and more. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish pre-service biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443.
  9. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35:125-129.
  10. Eichinger, D. C., Abell, S. K., & Dagher, Z. R.