Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162

Hacettepe University medical school students' views on and attitudes towards problem-based learning

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutumları ve Görüşleri

Pages
16–30
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Students stated that the problems about conducting PBL and evaluation in PBL as well as PBL scenarios and materials have effect on learning process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to describe medical students’ views on and attitudes towards problem based learning (PBL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, third year students (n=810) of Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine took part in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Students stated that the problems about conducting PBL and evaluation in PBL as well as PBL scenarios and materials have effect on learning process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe medical students’ views on and attitudes towards problem based learning (PBL). Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used in this descriptive study. First, third year students (n=810) of Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine took part in the study. Fifteen students were interviewed in three (3) focus group interviews. Data gathering instruments were the attitude scale towards PBL and an interview form. The attitude score of students who reported learner-centered method was used at the secondary school and the attitude score of the first and second year students were found higher. There was no significant difference on attitude scores between genders. It was observed that students and tutor roles explained during focus group interviews overlap with the described roles in PBL literature. Students stated that the problems about conducting PBL and evaluation in PBL as well as PBL scenarios and materials have effect on learning process.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi öğrencilerinin probleme dayalı öğrenmeye (PDÖ) ilişkin tutumları ve görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada betimsel yöntem kullanılarak nicel ve nitel veri toplama yöntemleri birlikte kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya ilk üç yıl öğrencileri (810 öğrenci) katılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada 3 odak grup görüşmesinde 15 öğrenci ile görüşme yapılmıştır. Çalışmada PDÖ’ye yönelik tutum ölçeği ve görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Ortaöğretim sırasında öğrenen merkezli uygulamalara yer verildiğini belirten öğrencilerin ve Dönem I ve Dönem II öğrencilerinin tutum puanları daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine göre anlamlı fark belirlenmemiştir. Odak grup görüşmelerinde, öğrencilerin PDÖ sürecinde yönlendirici ve öğrenci için tanımladıkları rollerin alanyazında belirlenen rollerle örtüştüğü, hazırlanan senaryo ve materyallerle birlikte, değerlendirme ve PDÖ’nün yürütülmesine ilişkin sorunların PDÖ’de öğrenme sürecini etkilediğine ilişkin görüşler belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, Ö., Sevgi, T. (2022). Hacettepe University medical school students' views on and attitudes towards problem-based learning. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162, 16–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/497730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Albanese, M. (2000). Problem-based learning: Why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education, 34, 729-738. Albanese,M.A. ve Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.
  2. Baptiste, S. (2003). Problem-based learning: A self-directed journey. Thorofare (USA): SLACK Incorporated. Bhattacharya, N. (1998). Students’ perceptions of problem-based learning at the B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal. Medical Education 32, 407-410.
  3. Biley, F.C. ve Smith, K.L. (1999). Making sense of problem-based learning: The perceptions and experiences of undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(5), 1205- 1212. Birgegard, G. ve Lindquist, U. (1998). Change in student attitudes to medical school after the introduction of problem-based learnnig in spite of low rating. Medical Education, 32, 46-49.
  4. Bridges, E. ve Hallingewr, P. (2003). Problem-based learning in educational leadership. İçinde W.G. Cunningham ve P.A. Cordeiro (2003, sf: 334-335). Educational Leadership A Problem- Based Approach (2nd Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum, 6. Baskı, Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Camp, G. (2003).
  6. Probleme Dayalı Öğrenme Nedir, Ne Değildir? F. Darendeliler (Çev.) Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 2. Caplow, H.A.J., Donaldson, J.F., Kardash, C.A ve Hosokowa M. (1997). Learning in a problembased curriculum: Students conceptions. Medical Education, 31, 440-447.
  7. Carder, L., Willingham, P. ve Bibb, D. (2001) Case-based, problem learning information literacy for the real world. Research Strategies, 8, 181-190.
  8. De Grave, W.S, Dolmans, D.H.J.M. ve van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (1998). Tutor intervention profile: Reliability and validity. Medical Education, 1998; 32:262-268.
  9. De Grave, W.S., Dolmans, D.H.J.M., van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (1999), Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: Scaffolding student learning. Medical Education, 33, 901-906.
  10. Demirören, M. (2005), Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Probleme Dayalı Öğrenme Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Bilim Dalı, Ankara.
  11. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave W. S., Wolfhagen I. H. A. P. ve van der Vleuten C. P. M. (2005).