SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162

PISA 2009 Öğrenci Anketinde Yer Alan Bilgisayar Tutum Boyutunun Kültürlerarası Eşitliğinin İncelenmesi

A Study of Cross-Cultural Equivalence of Computer Attitude in PISA 2009 Student Questionnaire

GÜZELLER. Oktay Cem
Pages
320–327
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The multi-group confirmatory factor analysis results showed that computer attitude has cross-cultural equivalence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine factorial structure of computer attitude of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the equality of questionnaire across 10 countries by a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 8 OECD and 2 non-OECD states were included in the sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The multi-group confirmatory factor analysis results showed that computer attitude has cross-cultural equivalence.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to examine factorial structure of computer attitude of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the equality of questionnaire across 10 countries by a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis model. For this purpose, 8 OECD and 2 non-OECD states were included in the sampling. No other selection was applicable for this sampling and data of 90, 393 individuals were used. Satisfactory values were obtained for the results of confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis for all sub-groups. The multi-group confirmatory factor analysis results showed that computer attitude has cross-cultural equivalence.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) anketinde yer alan bilgisayar tutum faktör yapısının 10 ülke örnekleminde eşitliğinin çoklu grup doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile incelenmesi amaçlamıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, 8 OECD ve 2 OECD dışı ülke örnekleme alınmıştır. Bu örneklemden ayrıca bir seçim yapılmamış ve 90,393 bireyin verileri kullanılmıştır. Tüm alt gruplar için yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analiz ve güvenirlik analiz sonuçlarında tatmin edici değerler elde edilmiştir. Ardından gerçekleştirilen çoklu grup doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları, bilgisayar tutumunun kültürlerarası eşdeğerliğe sahip olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Cem, G. O. (2022). PISA 2009 Öğrenci Anketinde Yer Alan Bilgisayar Tutum Boyutunun Kültürlerarası Eşitliğinin İncelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162, 320–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/497723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akyıldız, M. (2009). PIRLS 2001 Testinin Yapı Geçerliğinin Ülkelerarasi Karşılaştırılması (The comparison of construct validity of the PIRLS test between Countries). Journal of Education Faculty Of Yuzuncu Yil University, 6, 18-47.
  2. Allalouf, A., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (1999). Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(3), 185-198.
  3. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence,improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-73.
  4. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Byrne B.M (1994). Structural equation modelling with eqs and eqs/windows: basic concepts, applications, and programming. California: Sage. Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
  6. Çetin, B. (2010). Cross-cultural structural parameter invariance on PISA 2006 student questionnaires. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 38, 71-89
  7. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları (Multi-variance statistics SPPS and LISREL applications for social sciences). Ankara:
  8. PeGem Yayıncılık. Ercikan, K. (2002). Disentangling sources of differential item functioning in multi-language assessments. International Journal of Testing, 2(3&4), 199-215.
  9. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tahtam, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55
  10. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology: A Review and Comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131-152.
  11. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(3), 296-309.
  12. Jöreskog, K.G, & Sörbom D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Kelloway, K. E. (1995). Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational