Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 160

Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları ve çalışma becerileri

College of education students’ approaches to learning and study skills

Pages
65–80
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicated that most Turkish and American students prefer deep and strategic approaches to learning rather than surface ones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Research on higher education identifies students’ approaches to learning and study skills as a significant factor affecting the quality of learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings indicated that most Turkish and American students prefer deep and strategic approaches to learning rather than surface ones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turkish and American female students mostly prefer strategic approach whereas male students tend to use deep approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Research on higher education identifies students’ approaches to learning and study skills as a significant factor affecting the quality of learning. If teacher educators are to find ways for improving educational experiences of their students, they must understand how their students learn and the effects of the learning environment on their learning approaches. For this reason, this study examines Turkish and American college of education students’ approaches to learning and study skills. Furthermore, this research attempts to investigate whether there is any difference in students’ approaches to learning in regards to their major, school year, and gender. The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) was adapted to Turkish to investigate Turkish students’ learning approach and study skills and original ASSIST was also used for describing those of American students. Findings indicated that most Turkish and American students prefer deep and strategic approaches to learning rather than surface ones. As the year of study increased, the use of deep approach inclined in contrast, while school year was increased the use of surface approach decreased. Turkish and American female students mostly prefer strategic approach whereas male students tend to use deep approach.

Özet

Öğrencilerin öğrenme yaklaşımları ve çalışma becerilerinin, öğrenmenin niteliğini etkileyen önemli bir değişken olduğu birçok araştırmayla ortaya konmuştur. Öğretmen yetiştiren eğitimcilerin, öğrencilerinin eğitim yaşantılarını geliştirebilmeleri için onların nasıl öğrendiklerini, öğrenme yaklaşımlarını ve bu yaklaşımlarının gelişimine öğrenme çevresinin etkilerini anlamaları gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle, bu araştırmada, Türk ve Amerikan eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları ve çalışma becerileri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin tercih ettikleri öğrenme yaklaşımlarının alanlarına, sınıf düzeylerine ve cinsiyetlerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediği de araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada, Türk öğrencilerin öğrenme yaklaşımlarını belirlemek üzere ASSIST Türkçeye adapte edilmiş, Amerikalı öğrenciler için ölçeğin orijinali kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, Türk ve Amerikan öğrencilerin derinlemesine ve stratejik öğrenme yaklaşımlarını, yüzeysel öğrenme yaklaşımından anlamlı düzeyde daha çok tercih ettiklerini; sınıf düzeyi arttıkça derinlemesine öğrenme yaklaşımını kullanma düzeyinin arttığını; kız öğrencilerin stratejik, erkeklerin ise derinlemesine öğrenme yaklaşımını tercih ettiklerini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SENEMOĞLU, N. (2022). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları ve çalışma becerileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 160, 65–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/497704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
  2. Aharony, N. (2006). The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as foreign language in an internet environment. The British Psychological Society, 76. 851-866
  3. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 151- 161. Biggs, J., & Moore, P. J. (1993). The Process of Learning. Sydney: Prentice-Hall. Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
  4. Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). Approaches to learning of European business students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26 (1). 19-28.
  5. Byrne, M., Flood, B. & Willis. P. (2009). An inter‐institutional exploration of the learning approaches of students studying accounting. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 2, 155-167.
  6. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  7. Diseth, A. (2001). Validation of Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): application of structural equation modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381-394.
  8. Entwistle, N. J. (1997). The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Center for Research on Learning and Instruction. Enwistle, N. J. (2000a). Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: the influences of teaching and assessment. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. XV), (pp. 156-218). New York: Agathon Press.
  9. Entwistle, N. J. (2000b). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper to be presented at TLRP Conference, Leicester, November. Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M., & Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8, 365-380.
  10. Entwistle, N. J., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaff