Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 160

Türk Üniversite öğrencilerinde öznel iyi oluşu yordayan sosyodemografik değişkenler ve mizah tarzları

Humor styles and socio-demographic variables as predictors of subjective well-being of Turkish University students

Pages
158–170
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of regression analyses indicated that self-enhancing humor, aggressive humor, romantic relationship, gender and economic status predict of aggregate SWB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the relationship among socio-demographic variables and humor styles on university students’ subjective well-being (SWB).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants were 376 university students attending different faculties at Çukurova University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of regression analyses indicated that self-enhancing humor, aggressive humor, romantic relationship, gender and economic status predict of aggregate SWB.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship among socio-demographic variables and humor styles on university students’ subjective well-being (SWB). Participants were 376 university students attending different faculties at Çukurova University. Positive and Negative Affect, Satisfaction with Life, Humor Styles Questionnaires, and Socio-Demographic Information Questionnaire were used to collect data. To analyze the data, t-test, correlation, and stepwise regression analyses were employed. Aggregate SWB, Aggressive and self-defeating humor of male students were found to be significantly higher than those of female students. However, negative affect female students were significantly higher than those of male students. No significant difference between male and female students with respect to life satisfaction, positive affect, affiliative and self-enhancing humor was detected. Results of regression analyses indicated that self-enhancing humor, aggressive humor, romantic relationship, gender and economic status predict of aggregate SWB.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyodemografik özellikleri ile mizah tarzları ve öznel iyi oluşları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmaya Çukurova Üniversitesi’nin değişik fakültelerinden 376 öğrenci katılmıştır. Veriler, Olumlu ve Olumsuz Duygular, Yaşam Doyumu, Mizah Tarzları Ölçekleri ve Sosyodemografik Bilgi Formu ile elde edilmiştir. Analizlerde t-testi, korelasyon ve adımlı regresyon kullanılmıştır. Toplam öznel iyi oluş, saldırgan ve kendini yıkıcı mizah tarzlarında erkek öğrencilerin puanları, kızlardan anlamlı bir şekilde yüksek çıkmıştır. Olumsuz duygularda, kız öğrencilerin puanları erkek öğrencilerden anlamlı bir şekilde yüksek bulunmuştur. Olumlu duygular, yaşam doyumu, katılımcı mizah ve kendini geliştirici mizah değişkenleri açısından ise kız ve erkek öğrenciler arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Regresyon analizi sonucunda, kendini geliştirici mizah, saldırgan mizah, romantik ilişki, cinsiyet ve sosyoekonomik statünün toplam öznel iyi oluşu yordamada önemli olduğu anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜMKAYA, S. (2022). Türk Üniversite öğrencilerinde öznel iyi oluşu yordayan sosyodemografik değişkenler ve mizah tarzları. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 160, 158–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/497696

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bettencourt, A. B. & Sheldon, S. K. (2001). Social roles as vehicles for psychological need satisfaction within groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1131-1143.
  2. Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Doyle, A. B., Markiewicz, D. & Bukowski, W. M. (2002). Same-sex peer relationships and romantic relationships during early adolescence: Interactive links to emotional, behavioral, and academic adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 77- 103. Butt, D. S. & Beiser, M. (1987). Successful aging: A theme for international psychology. Psychology and Aging, 2(1) 87–94.
  3. Cenkseven, F. (2004). Examining the predictors of subjective and psychological well-being of university students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana. Cheng, H. & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality, self-esteem, and demographic predictions of happiness and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 921-942.
  4. Crawford, M. & Gressley, D. (1991). Creativity, caring and context: Women’s and men’s accounts of humor preferences and practices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(2), 217-231.
  5. Davila, J., Steinberg, S. J., Kachadourian, L., Cobb, R. & Fincham, F. (2004). Romantic involvement and depressive symptoms in early and late adolescence: The role of a preoccupied relational style. Personal Relationships, 11, 161-178.
  6. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  8. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103-157.
  9. Diener, E. (1998). Subjective well-being and personality. In Barone, D. F., M. Hersen & V. B. Van Hassett (Eds.), In advanced personality (pp. 311-334).
  10. Plenum, New York. Diener, E. & Diener, M. (1993). “Self-esteem and life satisfaction across 31 countries.” Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting on the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Baltimore. Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 926-935.
  11. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L. & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195-223.
  12. Diener, E. & Scollon, C. (2003). “S