Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 161

Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamları ölçeği'nin faktör yapısının incelenmesi

An examination of the factor structure of the Turkish version of the online learning Environment survey

Pages
159–174
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Model III, with a higher-order construct with twelve first-order factors of OLES-TR, was perfectly represented as a general online learning environments trait rather than the OLES.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Online Learning Environment Survey (OLES) in postsecondary distance education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The OLES is a 54 item instrument for assessing social-psychological perceptions among distance education students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Model III, with a higher-order construct with twelve first-order factors of OLES-TR, was perfectly represented as a general online learning environments trait rather than the OLES.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Online Learning Environment Survey (OLES) in postsecondary distance education. The OLES is a 54 item instrument for assessing social-psychological perceptions among distance education students. The second aim was to investigate empirically perception of the online learning environment in Turkish context. This paper consisted of three models explaining online learning environments in the Turkish context. Model I, based on relations of originally item-construct reported by Trinidad, Aldridge & Fraser, (2004), was analyzed with gathered data from Turkey setting by the translation, adaptation, and validation of the Online Learning Environment Survey (OLES) (Trinidad, Aldridge & Fraser, 2004) in a new Turkish-language form. In Model I, the OLES was designed to measure nine dimensions of online educational environment. The fit of the proposed multidimensional factor structure was examined with 902 post-secondary distance education students in two institutions. Model II, based on relations of emprically item-construct which were obtained with principal component analysis, was investigated with first-order confirmatory factor analysis. Model II consist of twelve subconstructs. Model III, with a higher-order construct with twelve first-order factors of OLES-TR, was perfectly represented as a general online learning environments trait rather than the OLES.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, yükseköğretimde uzaktan eğitim programlarına devam eden öğrencilerin, eğitim gördükleri çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarına yönelik psikososyal algılarının niteliğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaçla, çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamındaki psikososyal niteliği ölçen 54 maddelik Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamları Ölçeği Türkçe uyarlandı. Uç modelden oluşan bu araştırmada I. Modelde Online Learning Environment Survey (OLES) (Trinidad, Aldridge & Fraser, 2004) ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması yapılmıştır. Dokuz faktörden oluşan ölçek, uzaktan eğitim gören 902 üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde uygulanmıştır. II. Modelde, Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamları Ölçeği'nden elde edilen ölçümlerin, ölçeğin özgün boyutlarına uygun olarak birinci ve ikinci sıralı doğrulayıcı faktör modellerine uyumları sınanmıştır. Bu sınamalar sonucunda, ölçümlerin model-veri uyumunu sağlamadığı görülmüştür. Bu nedenle, Türkiye örneklemindeki görgül ölçme modeline ulaşmak için temel bileşenler analizine başvurulmuştur. Bu inceleme sonucu, araştırmada kullanılan ölçümlerin yüksek uyum değerleri ile on iki faktörde toplandığı görülmüştür. III. Modelde, OLES-TR'nin on iki birinci sıralı faktörünün ikinci sıralı faktör analizi ile belirlenen genel çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamları arasındaki bağıntıları ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKÖK, A., YURDUGÜL, H., AŞKAR, P. (2022). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamları ölçeği'nin faktör yapısının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 161, 159–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/497689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aşkar, P. (2005). Distance education in Turkey. Encyclopedia ofDistance Learning, 4, 635-639.
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1976). Multistructural statistical models applied to factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 3-25.
  3. Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika, 452, 289-308.
  4. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS/Windows user's guide. Multivariate Software, Encino, CA. Brown, R. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, (2). Retrieved from http://www.aln.org/ publications/jaln/v5n2/index.asp on May 10, 2007
  5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing fit. In K. A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Dorman, J., Fisher, D., & Waldrip, B. (2006). Classroom environment, students' perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy and attitude to science: A LISREL analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: World views (pp. 1-28). Singapore: World Scientific. Fraser, B. J. (1981). Tests of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA). Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications.Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 68-93.
  6. Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1-26).
  7. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific. Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. (1994). Assessing and researching the classroom environment. In D. Fisher (Ed.), The Study of Learning Environments (Vol. 8, pp. 23-39). Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2 ed.). Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2005). Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Clifts, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30,179-185.
  8. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoft criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternat