SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin öğretim elemanlarını değerlendirmesinde etkili olan faktörler

Contaminating factors in university students' evaluation of instructors

KALENDER. İlker
Pages
56–65
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Identification of source of differences between ratings may provide invaluable information for those who are interested in assessment of instructional effectiveness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study seeks to determine the variables explaining differences between the scores of student ratings given to instructors within the context of the university through discriminant analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ratings given by students were grouped into two groups based on their means and instructors were labeled as low-rated and high-rated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Identification of source of differences between ratings may provide invaluable information for those who are interested in assessment of instructional effectiveness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study seeks to determine the variables explaining differences between the scores of student ratings given to instructors within the context of the university through discriminant analysis. Ratings given by students were grouped into two groups based on their means and instructors were labeled as low-rated and high-rated. Predictors identified by discriminant analysis are (i) class size, (ii) credit, (iii) grade level, (iv) mean grade, and (v) number of sections. Results of the study suggested that low rated instructors are those who teach courses with smaller number of students, lower credits, higher grade levels, higher mean grades, and one section. Identification of source of differences between ratings may provide invaluable information for those who are interested in assessment of instructional effectiveness.

Özet

Bu çalışma üniversite ortamında öğretim görevlilerine verilen öğrenci değerlendirme puanları arasındaki farklılıkları ayırma analizi yöntemi ile belirlemeye çalışmaktadır. Öğrenciler tarafından verilen puanlar ortalamalarına göre iki gruba ayrılmış ve öğretim görevlileri düşük-puanlı ve yüksek-puanlı olarak iki grup halinde tanımlanmıştır. Ayırma analizi ile tanımlanan kestiriciler (i) sınıf mevcudu, (ii) dersin kredisi, (iii) sınıf düzeyi, (iv) sınıf ortalaması ve (v) aynı dersi alan grup sayısıdır. Çalışmanın sonuçları düşük-puanlı öğretim görevlilerinin düşük sınıf mevcudu olan, düşük kredili, üst sınıf düzeylerinde, sene sonu not ortalamalası yüksek olan ve tek grupla sınıflarda eğitim yapanlar olduğunu ortaya çıkartmıştır. Öğrenci değerlendirmeleri arasındaki farklılıkları açıklayan kaynakların tanımlanması öğretimin etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi ve iyileştirilmesi konusu ile ilgili olan kişisel için önemli bulgular sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İlker, K. (2022). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin öğretim elemanlarını değerlendirmesinde etkili olan faktörler. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 162, 56–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/497665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S., & Cohen, P. A. (1990). Validity of student ratings of instruction: what we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 219-231.
  2. Aleamoni, L. M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(2), 153-166.
  3. Aleamoni, L. M., & Hexner, P. Z. (1980). A review of the research on student evaluation and a report on the effect of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation. Instructional Science, 9, 67-84.
  4. Arubayi, E. A. (1987). Improvement of instruction and teacher effectiveness: are student ratings reliable and valid. Higher Education, 16(3), 267-278.
  5. Atamian, R., & Ganguli, G. (1993). Teacher popularity and teaching effectiveness: Viewpoint of accounting students. Journal of Education for Business, 68(3), 163-169.
  6. Basow, S. A., & Silverg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 308-314.
  7. Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & Long, J. S. (Eds. ) Testing Structural Equation Models. pp. 136–162.
  8. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Caplan, R. E., Endres, K. L., & Lueck, T. L. (1993). The interaction effects of gender on teaching evaluations. Journalism Educator, 48(3), 235-248.
  9. Cashin, W. E., Downey, R. G., & Sixbury, G. R. (1994). Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. Journal of Educational Psychology. 86(4), 649-657.
  10. Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: the research revisited. IDEA Paper No. 32. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_ storage_01/0000019b/80 /14/d2/44.pdf Chen, Y. & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: an assessment of student perception and motivation, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 71-88.
  11. Centra, J. A. (1973). Effectiveness of student feedback in modifying college instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 395-401.
  12. Conran, P. B. (1991). High school student evaluation of student teachers: how do they compare with professionals? Illinois School Research and Development, 27(2), 81-92.
  13. Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., & Menges, R. J. (1971). St