Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2012 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 163

Ortak ve akran değerlendirme eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının özdeğerlendirme becerileri üzerine etkisi

The effect of co- and peer assessment training on self-assessment skills of teacher trainees

Pages
190–202
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study revealed that the correlations between peer and self-assessment scores of experimental group were significant and high as compared to those in the control group; it was also observed that the peer assessment in the experimental group was a good predictor of self-assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the structural changes that occured in the curricula in Turkey, there has been an increase in the interest towards constructivist theory, active learning, and alternative assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, there were 33 participants in the experimental group and 37 participants in the control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study revealed that the correlations between peer and self-assessment scores of experimental group were significant and high as compared to those in the control group; it was also observed that the peer assessment in the experimental group was a good predictor of self-assessment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Since the structural changes that occured in the curricula in Turkey, there has been an increase in the interest towards constructivist theory, active learning, and alternative assessment. Various ideas have been suggested to improve self-assessment by focusing the attention on the relationship between metacognitive knowledge and self-assessment in the international literature. One of the suggestions is that “co- and peer assessment practices can influence self-assessment skills”. The aim of this study is to identify the influence of co and peer assessment training on self-assessment skills. In this study, there were 33 participants in the experimental group and 37 participants in the control group. The results of the study revealed that the correlations between peer and self-assessment scores of experimental group were significant and high as compared to those in the control group; it was also observed that the peer assessment in the experimental group was a good predictor of self-assessment.

Özet

Türkiye’de eğitim programlarında yapısal bir değişime gidilmesi, yapılandırmacı kuram,aktif öğrenme ve alternatif değerlendirme uygulamalarına ilgiyi artırmıştır. Uluslararası alanyazında, özellikle bilişüstü bilgi ve özdeğerlendirme arasındaki ilişkiye dikkat çekilerek,özdeğerlendirmenin geliştirilmesi için çeşitli düşünceler önerilmektedir. Bu önerilerden birisi de “ortak ve akran değerlendirme etkinlikleri özdeğerlendirme becerisini etkileyebileceği”düşüncesidir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, ortak ve akran değerlendirme eğitiminin özdeğerlendirme üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışma, deney grubunda 33, kontrol grubunda 37 olmak üzere toplam 70 öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonunda, deney grubunun akran ve özdeğerlendirme puanları arasındaki korelasyonları, kontrol grubundakilere oranla daha yüksek ve deney grubu lehine anlamlı bulunmuş, ayrıca deney grubunda akran değerlendirmenin özdeğerlendirmenin iyi bir kestiricisi olduğu gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDABAKAN, İ. (2022). Ortak ve akran değerlendirme eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının özdeğerlendirme becerileri üzerine etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 163, 190–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/497603

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Bowen, K. R. (2002). What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 587-605.
  2. Açıkgöz, K. (2003).
  3. Aktif Öğrenme. Kanyılmaz Matbaası, İzmir.
  4. Adams, C. & K. King. (1995). Towards a framework for student self-assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 336-343.
  5. Akhun, I. (1980). Akademik başarının kestirilmesi: Çoklu regrasyon yaklaşımının uygulanmasına dönük bir araştırma. A.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları, 88. Akhun, I. (1988). İstatistiksel formüller ve tablolar. Ankara.
  6. Andersson, L. W., & D. R. Krathwohl. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. Theory into Practice 41(4). Arter, J. (1997). Using assessment as a tool for learning, in: R. BLUM & J. ARTER (Eds) Student Performance Assessment in an Era of Restructuring, 1-6 (Alexandria, VA; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development). Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education 15: 101–111.
  7. Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. Kogan Page, London. Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 28-36.
  8. De Corte, E. 2000. High-powered learning communities: A European perspective. The Economic and Social Research Council’s Research Programme on Teaching and Learning Leicester, England, November 9-10, Available online at: http://www.tlrp.org/acadpub/Corte2000. pdf (accessed 10 july 2009).
  9. Demirel, Ö. (2000). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Program Geliştirme. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Yayınları.
  11. Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review 8(2), 96-100.
  12. Divaharan, S., & L. Atputhasamy. (2002). An attempt to enhance the quality of cooperative learning through peer assessment. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(2), 72-83.
  13. Dochy, F., & G. Moerkerke. (1997). The present, the past and the future of achievement testing and performance assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(5), 415-432.
  14. Dochy, F., M. Segers, & D. Sluijsmans. (1999). The use of self, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350.
  15. Education Reform Initiative. (2005). The evaluation report of new programs. Ankara: Ministry of National Education. Edwards, R., S. Ranson, & Strain, M. (2002). Reflexivity: towards a the