SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2012 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 166

Öğrencilerin akıcı okumalarına göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri

Students’ levels of using reading-comprehension strategies in relation to their proficiencies in reading fluently

H. Ömer BEYDOĞAN
Pages
3–13
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the frame of the findings, some suggestions were made on learners’ reading-comprehension processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fluent reading is a skill in which an individual increases his/her information process speed through the use of elements related to reading.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He/she also can use reading-comprehension strategies more effectively while increasing the speed of information process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the frame of the findings, some suggestions were made on learners’ reading-comprehension processes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fluent reading is a skill in which an individual increases his/her information process speed through the use of elements related to reading. He/she also can use reading-comprehension strategies more effectively while increasing the speed of information process. In this study, the reading-comprehension levels of the students in terms of the fluent reading abilities of the students were analyzed. To do that, 131 primary school 6th grade students formed the study sample. The reading levels of the students were determined by a multi-dimensional fluent reading scale followed by tests on reading-comprehension strategies. Data were represented through percentages, averages, berivate correlations, one-way variant analysis, t-test and LSD techniques. Finally, the readingcomprehension strategies usage levels of the students were determined in relation to their sex and fluent reading levels. Within the frame of the findings, some suggestions were made on learners’ reading-comprehension processes.

Özet

Akıcı okuma, bireyin okuma ile ilgili öğeleri kullanarak bilgi işleme hızını artırdığı bir beceridir. Bilgi işleme hızını artırırken okuma-anlama stratejilerini daha etkin kullanabileceği konuma gelmektedir. Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin akıcı okuma yeterliklerine göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla ilköğretim altıncı sınıfa devam eden 131 öğrenci çalışma evrenini oluşturmuştur. Çok boyutlu akıcı okuma ölçeği ile öğrencilerin akıcı okuma düzeyleri belirlenmiş, daha sonra okuma-anlama stratejileri kullanımıyla ilgili testler verilmiştir. Ölçme araçlarından elde edilen veriler, yüzdelik, aritmetik ortalama, berivate korelasyon tekniği, tek yönlü varyans analizi, t-test, LSD tekniğiyle analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucu, öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine, akıcı okuma düzeylerine göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde, akıcı okuma sürecine yönelik bazı öneriler dile getirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEYDOĞAN, H. Ö. (2022). Öğrencilerin akıcı okumalarına göre okuma-anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 166, 3–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/497593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 22, 131-148.
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, D. (1984). A schema-thematic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthals (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255 - 291). New York: Longman. Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in L2 reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.
  3. Ashby, J. & Clifton, C. (2005). The prosodic property of lexical stress effects eye 150 movements during silent reading. Cognition, 96(3), B89-B100. Baydık B.(2011). Okuma Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Üstbilişsel Okuma Stratejilerini Kullanımı ve Öğretmenlerinin Okuduğunu Anlama Öğretim Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 162, 301-318.
  4. Begeny, J.C., & Silber, J. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 183- 195. Berninger, V., Abbott, R., & Swanson, H. (2010). Relationship of word- and sentencelevel working memory to reading and writing in second, fourth, and sixth grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(2), 179-193.
  5. Brantmeier, C. A.(2000). The releationship between readers’ gender, passage content, comprehension and strategy use in reading Spanish as a second language. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Indiana University. Carrell, P. L.(1989). Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
  6. Courbron, C. (2012). The correlation between the three reading fluency subskills and reading comprehension in at-risk adolescent readers. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA. Çetinkaya, P., & Erktin, E.(2002. Assesment of metacognition and it’s reletionship with reading comprehension, achievement and aptitude, Boğaziçi Üniversity Journal of Education, 19, (1), 1-11.
  7. Gernschbacher, M.N.(1997). Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. (pp. 3–21).
  8. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Khun, M.R., & Stahle S. H.(2003). Fluency: A review of development and remedial practice, Jounal of Educational Psychology, 9, 3-21.
  9. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J.(1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-3