SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2012 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 166

Erteleme: Özellik modellerinin gözden geçirilmesi

Procrastination: Rethinking trait models

Arif ÖZER
Pages
303–317
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, the indirect effects of conscientiousness on neuroticism and of negative life events on procrastination were found to be statistically significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study is to examine the reciprocal relationship between procrastination and neuroticism depending on conscientiousness and negative life events within the scope of a non-recursive model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out during the 2011-2012 academic year on 677 teacher candidates (363 females, 302 males) attending the Art and Design Faculty of Gazi University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, the indirect effects of conscientiousness on neuroticism and of negative life events on procrastination were found to be statistically significant.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the reciprocal relationship between procrastination and neuroticism depending on conscientiousness and negative life events within the scope of a non-recursive model. The study was carried out during the 2011-2012 academic year on 677 teacher candidates (363 females, 302 males) attending the Art and Design Faculty of Gazi University. The participants were administered the Personality Test Based on Adjectives (Bacanlı et al., 2007), the General Procrastination Scale (Çakıcı, 2003), and the Life Events Inventory (Dinç, 2001). The results of this study indicated that there was a positive reciprocal relationship between neuroticism and procrastination, and that conscientiousness was negatively correlated with procrastination whereas negative life events were positively correlated with neuroticism. Also, the indirect effects of conscientiousness on neuroticism and of negative life events on procrastination were found to be statistically significant.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, erteleme ile nevrotizm arasındaki karşılıklı ilişkiyi, sorumluluk ve olumsuz yaşam olaylarına bağlı olarak, non-recursive bir model kapsamında incelemektir. Çalışma, 2011-2012 eğitim ve öğretim yılında Gazi Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Fakültesi'nde öğrenimlerine devam eden 677 öğretmen adayı (363’ü kadın, 302’si erkek, 12'si belirtilmedi) üzerinde yapılmıştır. Katılımcılara Sıfatlara Dayalı Kişilik Testi (Bacanlı ve ark., 2007), Genel Erteleme Ölçeği (Çakıcı, 2003) ve Üniversite Öğrencileri İçin Yaşam Olayları Envanteri (Dinç, 2001) uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, nevrotizm ve erteleme arasında pozitif yönde karşılıklı ilişkilerin bulunduğunu, sorumluluğun erteleme ile negatif yönde, olumsuz yaşam olaylarının ise nevrotizm ile pozitif yönde ilişkili olduklarını göstermektedir. Ayrıca sorumluluğun nevrotizm; olumsuz yaşam olaylarının da erteleme üzerindeki dolaylı etkileri istatistiksel bakımdan anlamlı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, A. (2022). Erteleme: Özellik modellerinin gözden geçirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 166, 303–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/497580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator. University of Pittsburgh: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved March 21, 2012 from http://search.proquest. com/docview/303242158?accountid=11054. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 20 User’s Guide. Retrieved March 21, 2012 from ftp:// public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/amos/20.0/ja/Manuals/IBM_ SPSS_Amos _User_ Guide.pdf. Bacanlı, H., İlhan, T., & Aslan, S. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Kuramına Dayalı Bir Kişilik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Sıfatlara dayalı kişilik testi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 261-279.
  2. Berry, W. D. (1984). Nonrecursive casual models, quantitative applications in social sciences. California: Sage University Papers. Beswick, G. & Rothblum, E. (1988). Psychological antecedents of student procrastination. Australian Psychologist, 23(2), 207–217.
  3. Branje, S. J., van Lieshout, C. F., & Gerris, J. R. (2007). Big five personality development in adolescence and adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 21(1), 45–6.
  4. Brody, N. (1994). Heritability of traits. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 117-119.
  5. Caldwell, L., & Mowrer, R. (1998). The link between procrastination, delay of gratification, and life satisfaction: A preliminary analysis. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3(4), 145-150.
  6. Cobb-Clark, D. & Schurer, S. (2011). The stability of big-five personality traits. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 21/11. Retrieved March 20, 2012 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1919414
  7. Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). Personality continuity and the changes of adult life. In M. Storandt & G. R. VandenBos (Eds.), The adult years: Continuity and change. The Master lectures, 41–77,
  8. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources. Çakıcı, D. Ç. (2003). Lise ve Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Genel ve Akademik Erteleme Davranışının İncelenmesi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  9. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  10. De Fruyt, F., Bartels, M., van Leeuwen, K. G., De Clercq, B., Decuyper, M., & Mervielde, I. (2006). Five types of personality continuity in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 538–552.
  11. Dewitte, S. & Schouwenburg, H. C. (2002).
  12. Procrastination, Temptations, and Incentives: The Struggle between the Present and the Future in Procrastinators and the Pu