SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 168

Public high schools teachers opinions on organizational dissent (sample of Ankara province)

Genel liselerde görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütsel muhalefete ilişkin görüşleri (Ankara ili örneği)

Murat ÖZDEMİR
Pages
113–128
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out in the research that dissent behaviors of the teachers were triggered by the unethical, illegal and bullying attitudes of the school administrators.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Opinions of teachers on organizational dissent were investigated in the present study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the study consisted of 6449 teachers working in 134 public high schools in the central districts of Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out in the research that dissent behaviors of the teachers were triggered by the unethical, illegal and bullying attitudes of the school administrators.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Opinions of teachers on organizational dissent were investigated in the present study. The population of the study consisted of 6449 teachers working in 134 public high schools in the central districts of Ankara. To determine the sample, stratified sampling technique was used and the sample was composed of 381 teachers. Organizational Dissent Scale-ODS developed in the present study was administered to the sample. The data were collected in the academic years of 2009-2010 and were analyzed with arithmetical mean, standard deviations, frequencies and t-test using SPSS Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS). It was found out in the research that dissent behaviors of the teachers were triggered by the unethical, illegal and bullying attitudes of the school administrators. The most common dissent behavior of the teachers was to object their administrators directly. In addition, it was found that school administrators suppress dissenters and also dissent affects administrators negatively. However, it was seen that dissent had some positive effects on various organizational processes like self-control, democracy, justice and organizational renewal.

Özet

Bu araştırmada öğretmenlerin örgütsel muhalefete ilişkin görüşleri incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın evreni, 2009-2010 öğretim yılında Ankara İli merkez ilçelerindeki 134 resmi genel lisede görev yapan 6449 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Örneklemin belirlenmesinde tabakalı örnekleme tekniği kullanılmış ve 381 öğretmen örnekleme alınmıştır. Örnekleme alınan öğretmenlere, araştırma kapsamında geliştirilmiş olan Örgütsel Muhalefet Ölçeği-ÖMÖ uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada toplanan veriler, SSPSS kullanılarak aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma, frekans ve t-testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada okullarda öğretmen muhalefetini etik dışı, hukuk dışı ve zorbaca davranışlar sergileyen yönetici tutumlarının tetiklediği saptanmıştır. Öğretmenlerin en sık sergiledikleri muhalif davranış ise doğrudan yöneticiye itiraz etmektir. Araştırmada ayrıca, yöneticilerin muhalif öğretmenleri baskı altına almaya çalıştıkları ve muhalefetin yöneticiler üzerinde olumsuz sonuçlar doğurduğu görülmüştür. Buna karşın muhalefetin okullarda öz-denetim, demokrasi, adalet ve örgütsel yenileşme üzerinde olumlu etkilerinin olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, M. (2022). Public high schools teachers opinions on organizational dissent (sample of Ankara province). Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 168, 113–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/497570

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ardoğan, R. (2004). Teorik Temeller ve Tarihsel Gerilimler Arasında İslam Kültüründe Siyasal Muhalefet. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 171-189.
  2. Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755–778. Bailey, L. (2001). Expressing organizational dissent: the role of ethical ideology and corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Strategies, 18, 71-89.
  3. Balcı, A. (2002). Etkili Okul: Okul Geliştirme, Kuram, Uygulama ve Araştırma. (3. Baskı. Ankara:
  4. PegemA Yayıncılık. Balcı, A. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. (5. Baskı). Ankara:
  5. PegemA Yayıncılık. Baron, R. A., and Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173. Baron, R. A., and Neuman, J. H. (1999). Social and personal determinants of workplace aggression: evidence for the impact of perceived injustice and the type a behavior pattern. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 281-296.
  6. Cannings, K. (1992). The voice of the loyal manager: distinguishing attachment from commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 261-272.
  7. Chisholm, L. (1999). The democratization of schools and the politics of teachers’ work in South Africa. Journal of Comparative Education, 29(2), 111-126.
  8. Cliggett, L., and Wyssmann, B. (2009). Crimes against the tuture: Zambian teachers’ alternative income generation and the undermining of education. Africa Today, 55(3), 25-43.
  9. Farrell, D., and Rusbult, C. E. (1992). Exploring the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect typology: the influence of job satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 201-218.
  10. Favela, A. (2010). Lasting lessons from Oaxaca: teachers as Luchadores Sociales: an inside account of the historic 2006 Oaxacan teachers’ movement and why it is still relevant today. Radical Teacher, 88, 63-72.
  11. Ford, R. C., and Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205-221.
  12. Freeman, R. B., and Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do? New York: Basic Books. Goodboy, A. K., Chory, R. M., and Dunleavy, K. N. (2008). Organizational dissent as a function of organizational justice. Communication Research Reports, 25(4), 255-265.
  13. Gordon, M. (2008). Toward a pedagogy of dissent. Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 21(2), 20-27.
  14. Graham, J. W. (1986