SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 169

Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları modeli (ÜYEP)ve üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin matematiksel yaratıcılıkları üzerindeki etkisi

Education programs for talented students model (EPTS) and its effectiveness on gifted students' mathematical creativity

Uğur SAK
Pages
51–61
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the two-year research studies imply that the EPTS is an effective, new program model in the education of gifted students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this article is to present an overview of the Education Programs for Talented Students (EPTS) and their effectiveness on gifted students mathematical creativity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants included 102 sixth and seventh-grade gifted students in middle schools in a mid-western city in Turkey and who were identified to be talented in mathematics and science by the EPTS identification system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the two-year research studies imply that the EPTS is an effective, new program model in the education of gifted students.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present an overview of the Education Programs for Talented Students (EPTS) and their effectiveness on gifted students mathematical creativity. The EPTS is a university-based, six-component program model. Its effectiveness was investigated using one-group pretest-posttest research design. Participants included 102 sixth and seventh-grade gifted students in middle schools in a mid-western city in Turkey and who were identified to be talented in mathematics and science by the EPTS identification system. Findings showed the EPTS mathematics instruction had medium to large effects on students fluency, flexibility and creativity in mathematics after attending the spring and summer programs of the EPTS. Results of the two-year research studies imply that the EPTS is an effective, new program model in the education of gifted students.

Özet

Bu makalede Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitim Programları modeli (ÜYEP) ve programın üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin matematiksel yaratıcılıkları üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. ÜYEP, üstün yetenekli ilköğretim öğrencilerine yönelik üniversite tabanlı, altı bileşenli bir programdır. Programın etkisi, tek grup öntest-sontest araştırma tasarımı kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırma grubunu, ÜYEP tanılama sistemi ile matematik ve fen bilimleri alanlarında üstün yetenekli olarak tanılanan ve 6. ve 7. sınıflara devam eden 102 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırma, ÜYEP bahar ve yaz dönemlerini kapsamış, öğrenciler bu süreçte ÜYEP modeline göre matematik eğitimi almışlardır. Araştırma, ÜYEP matematik eğitiminin öğrencilerin matematik alanında akıcı düşünme, esnek düşünme ve yaratıcı düşünme yetenekleri üzerinde orta ve yüksek düzeyde etkisinin olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAK, U. (2022). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları modeli (ÜYEP)ve üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin matematiksel yaratıcılıkları üzerindeki etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 169, 51–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/497537

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Ayas, B. (2010). Bilimsel Üretkenlik Testi’nin psikometrik özelliklerinin ilköğretim 6. sınıflar düzeyinde incelenmesi (A research study on the psychometric properties of the Creative Scientific Ability Test). Unpublished master’s thesis, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey. Ayas, B., & Sak, U. (2008). The test of scientific creativity: Its development and psychometric properties. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Intelligence and Creativity, Munster, Germany. Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted and talented. New York: Teachers College Press.
  2. Callahan, C. (2009). Making the grade or achieving the goal? Evaluating learner and program outcomes in gifted education. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (3rd ed.), pp. 221-258.
  3. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs and research. Boston: Houhton Mifflen Company. Ceci, S. J., Barnett, B. M., & Kanaya, T. (2003). Developing childhood proclivities into adult competencies: The overlooked multiplier effect. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Psychology of abilities, competencies and expertise (pp. 70-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Chan, D. W. (2000). Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong, High Ability Studies, 11, 69-82.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarwan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for education programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed. pp. 271-282).
  6. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd. Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ: Guide to improving intelligence and creativity. Buffala, NY: Creative Education Foundation. Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (2000). Instructional psychology and the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.), (pp. 383-396).
  7. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd. Hunsaker, S. L., Finley, V. S., & Frank, E. L. (1997). An analysis of teacher nominations and student performance in gifted progr