Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 170

Instructors’ exhibition levels of spiritual leadership behavior according to university preparatory class students

Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerine göre öğretim elemanlarının ruhsal liderlik davranışlarını gösterme düzeyleri

Pages
32–47
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to students, faculty members exhibit higher levels of spiritual leadership behaviours in “meaning/calling, altruistic love, hope/faith, productivity and membership” dimensions while they remain at moderate level in “vision” dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine instructors’ exhibition levels of spiritual leadership behaviour according to the perceptions of English language preparatory school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The universe of the study comprises 2600 students studying at English language preparatory class at Kocaeli University School of Foreign Languages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to students, faculty members exhibit higher levels of spiritual leadership behaviours in “meaning/calling, altruistic love, hope/faith, productivity and membership” dimensions while they remain at moderate level in “vision” dimension.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine instructors’ exhibition levels of spiritual leadership behaviour according to the perceptions of English language preparatory school students. The study is designed in a descriptive research model. The universe of the study comprises 2600 students studying at English language preparatory class at Kocaeli University School of Foreign Languages. The sample of the study was selected randomly and comprised 693 students. The data were collected using Turkish version of Fry’s (2003) “Spiritual Leadership Scale” which was translated and adapted by the researchers. After the factor analysis, it was determined that 26 items in the scale were grouped in 6 dimensions. These dimensions were the same as in the original scale. The arithmetic meand were used to determine instructors’ exhibition levels of spiritual leadership behaviour according to the perceptions of preparatory class students. T-test was used to determine whether students’ perceptions regarding instructors’ exhibition levels of spiritual leadership behaviour change according to gender and class level. Findings of the study show that instructors are perceived to exhibit high levels of spiritual leadership behaviours. According to students, faculty members exhibit higher levels of spiritual leadership behaviours in “meaning/calling, altruistic love, hope/faith, productivity and membership” dimensions while they remain at moderate level in “vision” dimension.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretim elemanlarının ruhsal liderlik davranışlarını gösterme düzeylerini üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin görüşlerine göre belirlemektir. Araştırma betimsel tarama modelinde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu hazırlık sınıfında öğrenim gören 2600 öğrenci, örneklemini ise tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 693 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri Fry’ın (2003) geliştirdiği “Ruhsal Liderlik Ölçeği”nin Türkçeye uyarlanması ile toplanmıştır. Yapılan faktör analizinde Ruhsal Liderlik Ölçeğindeki 26 maddenin 6 faktörde toplandığı görülmüştür. Bu faktörlerin ölçeğin orijinal halindeki alt boyutlarla örtüştüğü görülmüştür. Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerine göre öğretim elemanlarının ruhsal liderlik davranışlarını ne düzeyde gösterdiklerini belirlemek için aritmetik ortalamaya bakılmıştır. Öğretim elemanlarının ruhsal liderlik davranışlarını gösterme düzeylerine ilişkin algının, üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin cinsiyeti ve öğrenim gördükleri kura göre değişip değişmediğini test etmek için ise t-testi yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilere göre, öğretim elemanları ruhsal liderlik davranışını yüksek düzeyde göstermektedirler. Öğrencilere göre öğretim elemanları, ruhsal liderliğin alt boyutlarından heves uyandırma/anlam, özgecil sevgi, umut/inanç, üretkenlik ve üyeliğe ilişkin davranışları yüksek düzeyde gösterirken, vizyon boyutuna ilişkin davranışları orta düzeyde göstermektedirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜLÜBAŞ, T., POLAT, S. (2022). Instructors’ exhibition levels of spiritual leadership behavior according to university preparatory class students. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 170, 32–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/497532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Avolio, B. & Gardner, W. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338.
  2. Aydın, B. & Ceylan, A. (2009). The effect of spiritual leadership on organisational learning capacity. African Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 184-190.
  3. Baloğlu, N. & Karadağ, E. (2009). Ruhsal Liderlik Üzerine Teorik Bir Çözümleme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 15(58), 165-190.
  4. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great. New York: Harper Business. Conger, J.A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 439- 452. Çelik, V. (1995). Eğitim Yöneticisinin Vizyon Ve Misyonu. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 1(1). 47-53.
  5. Fry, L. W &, Cohen, M.P. (2009). Spiritual leadership as a paradigm for organisational transformation and recovery from extended work hours cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 265–278.
  6. Fry, L. W. & Matherly, L. L. (2006). Spiritual leadership as an integrating paradigm for positive leadership development. Paper presented at the 2006 Gallup Leadership Summit. Washington D. C. Fry, L. W. & Slocum JR, J. W. (2008). Maximizing the triple bottom line through spiritual leadership. Organisational Dynamics, 37(1), 26-96.
  7. Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 693-727.
  8. Fry, L. W. (2005). Introduction to the leadership quarterly special issue: Toward a paradigm of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 619-622.
  9. Fry, L. W., Matherly, L. L., Whittington, J. L., & Winston, B. E. (2007). Spiritual leadership as an integrating paradigm for servant leadership. In S. Singh-Sengupta & D. Fields (Eds.), Integrating spirituality and organizational leadership (pp. 70-82).
  10. Delhi, India: Macmillan India. http://iispiritualleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/SLTServantLeadership. pdf Erişim tarihi: 18.08.2013.
  11. Fry, L.W. & Matherly, L. (2006). Spiritual leadership and organizational performance: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, Georgia. Fry, L.W. (2008). Spiritual leadership: state-of -the-art and future directions for theory, research, and practice. In J. Biberman & Tishman, L. (Eds.), Spirituality in business: theory, practice, and future directions (pp. 106-124). New York: Palgrave. Gull, G. A., & Doh, J. (2004). The transmutation of the organization: Toward a more