SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167

Organizational justice perceptions of administrators in central organization of Ministry of National Education

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı merkez örgütündeki yöneticilerin örgütsel adalet algıları

Nihan DEMİRKASIMOĞLU
Çetin ERDOĞAN
Ünal AKYÜZ
Pages
273–288
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, it is understood that justice of distribution in public institutions is not respected enough; respect and courtesy in communication among staff is much more taken into care at higher levels than at lower levels; staff are participating in decision making process but not effective in the final decision; and intraorganizational corrective justice mechanisms do not operate functionally.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, administrators' perceptions related to organizational justice in Central Organization of The Ministry of National Education were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were gathered from totally 15 administrators by semi structured interview method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it is understood that justice of distribution in public institutions is not respected enough; respect and courtesy in communication among staff is much more taken into care at higher levels than at lower levels; staff are participating in decision making process but not effective in the final decision; and intraorganizational corrective justice mechanisms do not operate functionally.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, administrators' perceptions related to organizational justice in Central Organization of The Ministry of National Education were examined. The research was designed as a qualitative study and has been performed through interviews. The data were gathered from totally 15 administrators by semi structured interview method. Five questions were asked to administrators related to organizational justice dimensions. Descriptive analysis technique was used to analyze the data. According to findings, public administrators perceive the concept of organizational justice as “the justice in distribution of positions, status, awards and resources”. Besides, it is understood that justice of distribution in public institutions is not respected enough; respect and courtesy in communication among staff is much more taken into care at higher levels than at lower levels; staff are participating in decision making process but not effective in the final decision; and intraorganizational corrective justice mechanisms do not operate functionally.

Özet

Bu araştırmada Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı merkez örgütünde görev yapan yöneticilerin örgütsel adalet algıları incelenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yöntemiyle desenlenen bu araştırmada görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Veriler, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı merkez örgütünde görev yapan 15 yönetici ile yapılan görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Veriler betimsel analiz tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre yöneticiler örgütsel adalet kavramını genellikle “örgütte makam, statü, ödül ve kaynakların dağıtımında adalet” şeklinde algılamaktadır. Bunun yanında kamu örgütlerinde dağıtım adaletinin yeterince gözetilemediği; çalışanlar arasındaki iletişimde saygı ve nezaket kurallarına üst kademelerde alt kademelere oranla daha çok özen gösterildiği; çalışanların kararlara katıldığı ancak son kararın verilmesinde etkin olmadıkları ve örgüt içi düzeltici adalet mekanizmalarının işlevsel olarak çalışmadığı anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKASIMOĞLU, N., ERDOĞAN, Ç., AKYÜZ, Ü. (2022). Organizational justice perceptions of administrators in central organization of Ministry of National Education. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167, 273–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/497527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (pp. 267-99). New York: Academic Pres Inc. Aydın, İ. & Karaman-Kepenekçi, Y. (2008). Principals’ opinions of organisational justice in elementary schools in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (4), 497-513.
  2. Barutçugil, İ. (2004). Organizasyonlarda Duyguların Yönetimi. İstanbul:
  3. Kariyer Yayıncılık İletişim, Eğitim Hizmetleri Ltd. Şti. Baş, G., ve Şentürk, C. (2011). İlköğretim Okulu Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık ve Örgütsel Güven Algıları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice], 17(1), 29-62.
  4. Baxter, P.&Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 4, 544-559.
  5. Bies, R.&Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard and M. Bazerman (eds.) Research on negotiations in organizations, Vol 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 43-55
  6. Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. (3rd Edition). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Bradford, S. B., Wiechmann, D.&Ryan, A. M. (2006). Consequences of Organizational Justice Expectations in a Selection System. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (2), 455-466.
  7. Camerman, J., Cropanzano, R.&Vandanberghe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Justice for Temporary Workers. Group and Organization Management, 32 (2), 176-207.
  8. Cohen-Charash, Y.&Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86, 278-321.
  9. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, A. B., Judge, T. A. & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and Personality: Using Integrative Theories to Derive Moderators of Justice Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110-127.
  10. Colquitt, J. A. & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational Justice: A Fair Assessment of the State of the Literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed). Organizational Behavior. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc. Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J. & Zapata-Phelan, C. P.(2005). What is Organizational Justice? A Historical Overview. In Greenberg, J., Colquitt, J. A. (Eds) Handbook of organizational justice. (pp. 3-56).
  11. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  12. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A.,&Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional