Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167

The influence of income, education and occupation as dimensions of one’s social class on families’ socialization-education processes

Sosyal sınıfın boyutları olarak gelirin, eğitimin ve mesleğin ailelerdeki sosyalleştirme-eğitim süreçlerine etkisi

Pages
128–143
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compared to poor families, parents in higher-socioeconomic status were more likely to demonstrate affection and respect for children, engage their children in conversation, learning activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article addresses the theories and studies related to the impact of social class or socioeconomic status on socialization-education processes of families.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The family stress model of economic hardship suggests that poverty has an adverse effect on parents’ emotions, behaviors, relationships, their parenting and/or socialization strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compared to poor families, parents in higher-socioeconomic status were more likely to demonstrate affection and respect for children, engage their children in conversation, learning activities.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article addresses the theories and studies related to the impact of social class or socioeconomic status on socialization-education processes of families. The family stress model of economic hardship suggests that poverty has an adverse effect on parents’ emotions, behaviors, relationships, their parenting and/or socialization strategies. Parents in lower-socioeconomic status compared with middle-socioeconomic status are more likely to use a harsher, more authoritarian, parenting style as indicated by physical punishment and the absence of reasoning with children about the consequences of their behavior. The family investment model discusses that wealthy families are able to make significant investments in their children, whereas poor families must invest in more immediate family needs. Compared to poor families, parents in higher-socioeconomic status were more likely to demonstrate affection and respect for children, engage their children in conversation, learning activities.

Özet

Bu makale, sosyal sınıfın ya da sosyoekonomik statünün ailelerdeki sosyalleştirme-eğitim süreçlerine etkisi ile ilgili teorileri ve araştırmaları ele almaktadır. Ekonomik güçlükle ilgili aile stres modeli, yoksulluğun annenin-babanın duyguları, davranışları, ilişkileri, çocuk yetiştirme ya da sosyalleştirme stratejileri üzerine kötü bir etkisinin olduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Orta sosyoekonomik statü ile karşılaştırıldığında daha düşük sosyoekonomik statüdeki annelerbabalar, davranışlarının sonuçları hakkında çocuklarıyla akıl yürütmenin yokluğunu ve fiziksel cezalandırmayı yansıtan daha sert, daha otoriteryan bir yönde çocuk yetiştirme biçimini daha çok kullanabilmektedir. Aile yatırım modeli, yoksul aileler daha acil aile gereksinimlerine para harcamak zorunda iken, zengin ailelerin çocuklarına önemli yatırımlar yapabildiğini tartışmaktadır. Yoksul ailelerle karşılaştırıldığında daha yüksek sosyoekonomik statüdeki anneler-babalar, çocuklarına daha çok sevgi ve saygı gösterebilmekte, onların konuşmaları ve öğrenme etkinlikleri ile daha çok ilgilenebilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÖNÜL, T. (2022). The influence of income, education and occupation as dimensions of one’s social class on families’ socialization-education processes. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167, 128–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/497497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adams, B. N. (1998). The family: a sociological interpretation. New York: Harcourt Brace. Ataman, J. & Epir, S. (1972). Socio-economic status and classificatory behavior among Turkish children. In: L.J.C. Cronbach & P.J.D. Drenth (Eds.), Mental Test and Cultural Adaptation, pp.329-337). The Hague: Mouton. Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). Predictors of early high school drop-out: a test of five theories, Journal Educational Psychology, 92, 568-582.
  2. Becker, G. S. & Thomes, N. (1986). Human capital and the rise and fall of families, Journal of Labor Economics, 4, S1-S139. Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Bloom, B. (1964). Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley. Borduin, C. M. & Henggeler, N. (1981). Social class, experimental setting and task characteristics as determinants of mother-child interactions, Developmental Psychology, 17, 209-214.
  4. Bornstein, M. H. Hahn, C.-S., Suwalsky, J. T. D. & Haynes, O. M. (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development: The Hollingshead Four-Factor Index of Social Status and The Socioeconomic Index of Occupations. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 29-82).
  5. Mahwahl, NJ: Erlbaum. Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F. (2001). Age and ethnic variations in family process mediators of SES. Presented at conference, socioeconomic status, parenting and child development. Minneapolis: MN. Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development, Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
  6. Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F.(2003). Age and etnic variations in family process mediators of SES. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 161-188).
  7. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bradley, R. H. Corwyn, R. F. Burchinal, M. McAdoo, H. P. & Garcia Coll C. (2001a.). The home environments of children in the United States. Part 2: relations with behavioral development through age 13. Child Development, 72(6), 1868-1886.
  8. Bradley, R. H. Corwyn, R. F. McAdoo, H. P. & Garcia Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States: Part I. Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status, Child Development, 72, 1844-1867.
  9. Brody, G. H., Flor D.L. & Gibson, N. M. (1