SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 168

A comparison of gender inequality in Turkish education system with that of EU countries

Türk eğitim sistemindeki cinsiyet eşitsizliklerinin AB ülkeleri ile karşılaştırılması

İlknur MAYA
Pages
69–84
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the outcomes of the research, Turkey is still well behind the EU countries in terms of girls gross schooling rates and gender parity index at all stages of education and expected number of years of girls formal schooling from primary school to higher education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study sets out to display the inequality on gender basis in the Turkish education system while making a comparison of the current state in Turkey with that of EU countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population constituted Turkey and 27 EU countries, and without taking a sample, the whole population is intended to be reached.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the outcomes of the research, Turkey is still well behind the EU countries in terms of girls gross schooling rates and gender parity index at all stages of education and expected number of years of girls formal schooling from primary school to higher education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study sets out to display the inequality on gender basis in the Turkish education system while making a comparison of the current state in Turkey with that of EU countries. The method used in the research is document analysis. The population constituted Turkey and 27 EU countries, and without taking a sample, the whole population is intended to be reached. The research data come from such institutes as OECD (2012), UIS (2011), EURYDICE (2009), and the Ministry of Education (2012) since access to the latest statistical data is required. As for data analysis, the percentage of and the arithmetic mean of EU countries values are examined on the relevant dimensions and comparison is made with the values of Turkey. According to the outcomes of the research, Turkey is still well behind the EU countries in terms of girls gross schooling rates and gender parity index at all stages of education and expected number of years of girls formal schooling from primary school to higher education.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Türk eğitim sistemindeki cinsiyet eşitsizliklerini ortaya koymayı ve var olan durumu AB ülkeleri ile karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan yöntem, doküman incelemesidir. Evreni, Türkiye ve 27 AB ülkesi oluşturmaktadır. Örneklem alınmaksızın tüm evrene ulaşılmak istenmiştir. Araştırmada en son istatistiksel verilere ulaşılmak istendiğinden, ilgili veriler OECD (2012), UIS (2011), EURYDICE (2009) ve MEB (2012) istatistiklerinden elde edilmiştir. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde, ilgili boyutlarda AB ülkeleri değerlerinin aritmetik ortalamalarına veya yüzdeliklerine bakılmış ve Türkiyenin değerleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuç olarak Türkiye, eğitimin tüm kademelerinde kızların brüt okullaşma oranları ve cinsiyet eşitliği indeksi ve ilköğretimden yükseköğretime kadar kızlardan beklenen eğitim süresi bakımından AB ülkelerinin gerisindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAYA, İ. (2022). A comparison of gender inequality in Turkish education system with that of EU countries. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 168, 69–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/497488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adem, M. (1995).
  2. Demokratik, Laik, Çağdaş, Eğitim Politikası. Ankara: Şafak Matbaacılık. Avrupa Parlamentosu. (2007). AB - Türkiye İlişkilerine İlişkin Avrupa Parlamentosu Kararı. (2007/36-0376).
  3. Bruce, H. R., & Işık, A. A. (2006). Gender inequality in schooling: The case of Turkey. Sociology of Education, Albany, 79, 25-43.
  4. Byrne, D., & Baron, R. A. (1997). Social psychology. (8 th Edn.). Boston. Charlton, E., Mills M., Martino W., & Beckett, L. (2007). Sacrificial girls: A case study of the impact of streaming and setting on gender reform. British Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 459- 478. Cooper, M. A. (2009). Dreams deferred? The relationship between early and later postsecondary education aspirations among racial / ethnic groups. Educational Policy, 23(4), 615-650.
  5. Daniel, J., Kanwar, A., & Uvalic’- Trumbic’, S. (2009). Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: Access, cost and quality. Change, March / April, 30-35. DPT. (2001a). Okul Öncesi Eğitim – İlköğretim - Özel Eğitim Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. 8. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı. DPT. (2001b). Ortaöğretim: Genel Eğitim, Meslek Eğitimi, Teknik Eğitim Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. 8. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı. DPT. (2008). 9. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı. Dünya Bankası. (2010). Türkiye: Gelecek Nesiller İçin Fırsatların Çoğaltılması. Yaşam fırsatları (Rapor No: 48627-TR), [Online]: Retrieved on 06 October 2010, at URL: http:// siteresources.worldbank.org/TURKEYEXTN/Resources/361711_1270026284729/ ExpandingOpportunitiesForTheNextGeneration_tr.pdf. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling.In A. Bloom & J. F. Dunn. (Eds.). Family - school links: How do they affect educational outcomes?. 3-34. Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum. EHEA. (2001). Towards the European higher education area. Communiqué of the meeting of European ministers in charge of higher education in Prague on May 19th 2001. [Online]: Retrieved on 06 October 2010, at URL: http: //ehea.europeunit.ac.uk. Ekinci, C. E. (2009). Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Harcama ve Maliyetleri. Education and Science, 34(154), 119-133.
  6. Erginer, A. (2009). Avrupa Birliği Eğitim Sistemleri. Ankara:
  7. Pegem A Akademi. EURYDICE. (2005). Key data on education in Europe 2005. [Online]: Retrieved on 02 March 2009,at URL: http: //www.eurydice.org. EURYDICE. (2006). National summary sheets on education systems in Europe and ongoing reforms. [Online]: Retrieved on 10 March 2012, at URL: http: //www.eurydice.org. EURY