SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 170

Öğretmen adaylarının değerlendirmeye ilişkin görüşleri ve yeterlik inançları: Değerler ve uygulamalar

Prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment and efficacy beliefs: Values and practices

Altay EREN
Pages
19–31
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results of the present study, it was suggested that prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment should be considered together with their efficacy beliefs during teacher education process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to examine whether prospective teachers’ efficacy beliefs played significant mediating roles in the relationships between their assessment-related values and practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 423 prospective teachers voluntarily participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results of the present study, it was suggested that prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment should be considered together with their efficacy beliefs during teacher education process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether prospective teachers’ efficacy beliefs played significant mediating roles in the relationships between their assessment-related values and practices. A total of 423 prospective teachers voluntarily participated in the study. Results of the present study showed that the relationships between prospective teachers’ values and practices were partly, but significantly, mediated by their efficacy beliefs in terms of their conceptions of making learning explicit and promoting learning autonomy. Furthermore, results also showed that the relationships between prospective teachers’ efficacy beliefs and conceptions of performance orientation were non-significant in terms of their values and practices. Based on the results of the present study, it was suggested that prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment should be considered together with their efficacy beliefs during teacher education process.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının yeterlik inançlarının değerlendirmeyle ilgili değerleri ve uygulamaları arasındaki ilişkilerde anlamlı arabuluculuk rolleri oynayıp oynamadığının incelenmesidir. Toplam 423 öğretmen adayı çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, öğretmen adaylarının hem öğrenmeyi belirgin hale getirmeye, hem de öğrenme sürecinde otonomi sağlamaya yönelik olarak ifade ettikleri değerler ve uygulamalara ilişkin görüşleri arasındaki ilişkilerin yeterlik inançları tarafından kısmen, ancak anlamlı düzeyde düzenlenmekte olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, öğretmen adaylarının yeterlik inançları ve performans odaklı görüşleri arasındaki ilişkinin anlamlı olmadığını da ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmanın sonuçlarından hareketle, öğretmen adaylarının değerlendirmeye ilişkin görüşlerinin öğretmen eğitimi sürecinde yeterlik inançlarıyla birlikte dikkate alınması önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, A. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının değerlendirmeye ilişkin görüşleri ve yeterlik inançları: Değerler ve uygulamalar. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 170, 19–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/497486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akşit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 129-137.
  2. Allen, J. M. (2009). Valuing practice over theory: How beginning teachers re-orient their practice in the transition from the university to the workplace. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 647-654.
  3. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation. Ashton, P., & Webb, R. (1982, March). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: Toward an ecological model. Paper presented at the manual annual meeting of the AERA, New York. Astin, A. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2012).
  4. Assessment for excellence. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  5. Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2009). An investigation of primary school teachers’ proficiency perceptions about measurement and assessment methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 681-685.
  6. Black, P., & D. Wiliam. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.
  7. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 301-318.
  8. Brophy, J. (1979). Teacher behavior and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 735-750.
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum. Chan, K. W., Tan, J., & Khoo, A. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning: A closer look at Singapore cultural context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (2), 181-195.
  10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
  11. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (1998). Reforming teacher education through self-study. In A. L. Cole, R. Elijah, & J. G. Knowles (Eds.), The heart of the matter: Teacher educators and teacher education reform. San Francisco, CA: Caddo Gap. Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Deemer, S. A. (2004).