SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 170

Motives of ungraduate students to study at higher education institutions and their socialization tactics

Lisans öğrencilerini yükseköğrenim görmeye yönelten nedenler ve sosyalleşme taktikleri

Ceren ÖZKAN
Sıdıka GİZİR
Pages
223–236
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results also showed that there were significant differences among the students’ motives to study and their socialization tactics in terms of gender and grade level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to identify the motives of undergraduate students to study at institutions of higher education and their socialization tactics, and to determine the relationship between these two variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, Faculty of Education at Mersin University has been specified as a case and the sample of this study consisted of 1617 undergraduate students. ‘Motives to Study’ and ‘Socialization Tactics’ scales were used to collect the data from the sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results also showed that there were significant differences among the students’ motives to study and their socialization tactics in terms of gender and grade level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the motives of undergraduate students to study at institutions of higher education and their socialization tactics, and to determine the relationship between these two variables. In addition, this study aims at examining whether these variables differ in terms of students’ gender and grade level. In this study, Faculty of Education at Mersin University has been specified as a case and the sample of this study consisted of 1617 undergraduate students. ‘Motives to Study’ and ‘Socialization Tactics’ scales were used to collect the data from the sample. The collected data were analyzed through correlation, t-test and ANOVA statistical methods. The results of the analysis provided evidence that there were significant correlations between the motives of undergraduate students to study in higher education and their socialization tactics. The results also showed that there were significant differences among the students’ motives to study and their socialization tactics in terms of gender and grade level.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Eğitim Fakültesi lisans öğrencilerini yükseköğrenim görmeye yönelten nedenler ile öğrencilerin sosyalleşme taktiklerini belirleyerek aralarındaki ilişkileri incelemek ve bu değişkenlerin cinsiyet ile sınıf düzeyi değişkenlerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmada Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi örnek durum (vaka) olarak belirlenmiş ve fakülteye kayıtlı 1617 lisans öğrencisi araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. ‘Yükseköğrenim Görmeye Yönelten Nedenler Ölçeği’ ve ‘Sosyalleşme Taktikleri Ölçeği” aracılığıyla örneklemden veriler toplanmış ve korelasyon, t-testi ve ANOVA ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları öğrencileri yükseköğrenim görmeye yönelten nedenler ile öğrencilerin kullandıkları sosyalleşme taktikleri arasında orta düzeye yakın anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin yükseköğrenim görme nedenleri ile öğrencilerin sosyalleşme taktikleri cinsiyete ve bulundukları sınıf düzeyine göre anlamlı farklılıklar göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, C., GİZİR, S. (2022). Motives of ungraduate students to study at higher education institutions and their socialization tactics. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 170, 223–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/497485

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aktaş, Y. (1997). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Uyum Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi: Uzunlamasına Bir Çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 107-110.
  2. Astin, A. (1977). Four critical years: Effects of college on belives, attitudes, and knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  3. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  4. Attinasi, L. C. 1989. Getting in: Mexican Americans’ perceptions of university attendance and the implications for freshman year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 247-277.
  5. Bogler, R. & Somech, A. (2002). Motives to study and socialization tactics among university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142 (2), 233-248.
  6. Bumstead, D. C. (1975). Freshman socialization: The influence of social class backgrounds on the adaptation of students. Human Relations, 28, 387-406.
  7. Carter, D. F. (1999). The impact of institutional choice and environments on african-american and white students’ degree expectations. Research in Higher Education, 40, 17-41.
  8. Chickering, A. W. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chickering, A. W. & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  9. Duchesne, I. & Nonneman, W. (1998). The demand for higher education in Belgium. Economics of Education Review, 17 (2), 211-218.
  10. Duru, E. (2008). The predictive analysis of adjustment difficulties from loneliness, social support, and social connectedness. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8 (3), 849-856.
  11. Ergen, H. (2009).
  12. Eğitimin Ekonomik Temelleri, K. Kıroğlu ve C. Elma (Edt), Eğitim Bilimine Giriş (ss. 193-220). Ankara:
  13. Pegem Akademi. Erickson, B. L. & Strommer, D. W. (2005). Inside the first year classroom: Challenges and constrains, M. L. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner, B. O. Barefoot ve diğ. (Ed.), Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college (ss. 241-257). New York: Jossey-Bass. Feldman, K. A. & Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers.
  14. Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C. & Ethington, C. A. (2004). What do college students have to lose? Exploring the outcomes of differences in person- environment fits. The Journal of Higher Education, 75 (5), 528-555.
  15. Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Psychology, 8, 1-33.
  16. Gizir, C. A. (1998). “A Study on the Prob