SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2014 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 172

Öğrenci katılımı ve TIMSS 2011 fen başarısı arasındaki ilişkinin sınıflara göre karşılaştırılması

Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement

Nurcan KAHRAMAN
Pages
95–107
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the 4th grade students display significantly higher engagement than the 8th graders do.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aims to investigate the relationship between students’ engagement and achievement, and how this relationship changes across the 4th and 8th grade students in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:TIMSS 2011 data were used for the purpose of the study. 7479 fourth grade elementary and 6928 eighth grade middle school students from Turkey participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the 4th grade students display significantly higher engagement than the 8th graders do.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the relationship between students’ engagement and achievement, and how this relationship changes across the 4th and 8th grade students in Turkey. TIMSS 2011 data were used for the purpose of the study. 7479 fourth grade elementary and 6928 eighth grade middle school students from Turkey participated in the study. According to the results, the 4th grade students display significantly higher engagement than the 8th graders do. Moreover, both student groups’ behavioral engagement has positive effect on science achievement. In terms of emotional engagement trajectories, while the 4th graders’ liking science has positive influence on students’ science achievement, school belonging has no significant influence. On the other side, the two dimensions of emotional engagement have positive influence on achievement of the 8th graders.

Özet

Bu çalışma ilkokul 4. Sınıf ve ortaokul 8. Sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersindeki katılım ve başarı ilişkisini ve bu ilişkinin 4. Sınıf ve 8. Sınıfta nasıl farklılık gösterdiğini incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini TIMSS 2011 Türkiye verileri oluşturmaktadır. Türkiye’den 7479 4. Sınıf ve 6928 8. Sınıf öğrencileri 2011 yılında TIMSS sınavına katılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre 4. Sınıf öğrencilerinin 8. Sınıf öğrencilerinden daha yüksek katılım göstermektedir. Ayrıca, her iki grup için davranışsal katılımın başarı üzerinde pozitif etkisi görülmüştür. Duyuşsal katılım açısından incelendiğinde, 4. Sınıflar için feni sevme akademik başarıya pozitif etki ederken, okul bağlılığının anlamlı bir etkisi olmamaktadır. 8. Sınıflarda ise her iki boyutun da pozitif etkisi gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, N. (2022). Öğrenci katılımı ve TIMSS 2011 fen başarısı arasındaki ilişkinin sınıflara göre karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 172, 95–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/497464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269-298.
  2. Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233-259.
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497. Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291-314.
  4. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African‐American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child development, 65(2), 493-506.
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation, Lincoln, NE. 38, 237-288.
  6. Dewey, J. (1958).
  7. Experience and nature. New York, NY: Dover Publications. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Ames &C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-186).
  8. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children's knowledge about the mind. Annual review of psychology, 50(1), 21-45.
  9. Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59 – 109. Fredericks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519−533. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
  10. Foy, P., Brossman, B., & Galia, J. Scaling the TIMSS and PIRLS 2011
  11. Achievement Data. Goodenow, C. (1993a). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
  12. Goodenow, C. (1993b). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psycho