Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2014 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 171

Etkili yaşam boyu öğrenme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik & güvenirlik çalışması

Developing an effective lifelong learning scale (ELLS): Study of validity & reliability

Pages
244–257
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This scale is a supplementary tool for the evaluation of individuals’ success in lifelong learning as well as their level of characteristics that will lead to effective lifelong learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study was to develop an “Effective Lifelong Learning Scale (ELLS)” in Turkish language.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 48-item initial version of the ELLS was applied to a total of 742 (528 for EFA and 214 for CFA) student teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This scale is a supplementary tool for the evaluation of individuals’ success in lifelong learning as well as their level of characteristics that will lead to effective lifelong learning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to develop an “Effective Lifelong Learning Scale (ELLS)” in Turkish language. The 48-item initial version of the ELLS was applied to a total of 742 (528 for EFA and 214 for CFA) student teachers. For item analysis, the results of the item loadings, the item analysis based on the correlations and the item analysis based on the difference between the upper and lower group means were evaluated together. The single-factor construct and the 33 items were obtained. The percentage of the variance that the single-factor construct was able to explain was 41.68%. The fit indices obtained (2/df: 3.39; RMSEA: .057; GFI: .84; AGFI: .82; RMR: .033; SRMR: .044; NFI; .97; NNFI: .98; CFI: .98) were evaluated, and the construct was confirmed to have a good fit. The Cronbach’s alpha (α) internal consistency coefficient was computed to be .96. This scale is a supplementary tool for the evaluation of individuals’ success in lifelong learning as well as their level of characteristics that will lead to effective lifelong learning.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkçe dilinde “Etkili Yaşam Boyu Öğrenme Ölçeği (EYBÖÖ)” geliştirmektir. EYBÖÖ’nün 48 maddelik ilk formu 742 (528 birey AFA için ve 214 birey DFA için) öğretmen adayına uygulanmıştır. Madde analizi için, madde yükleri, madde-toplam korelasyonları ve alt-üst grup ortalamaları farkları birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Tek faktörlü 33 maddelik ölçme aracı elde edilmiştir. Tek faktörlü yapının açıklanan varyansı %41.68’dir. Uyum indeksleri (2/sd: 3.39; RMSEA: .057; GFI: .84; AGFI: .82; RMR: .033; SRMR: .044; NFI; .97; NNFI: .98; CFI: .98) değerlendirilmiş ve modelin iyi bir uyuma sahip olduğu doğrulanmıştır. Cronbach alfa (α) iç tutarlılık katsayısı .96 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu ölçek, bireyin yaşam boyu öğrenmedeki başarısını ve bireyde etkili bir yaşam boyu öğrenmeyi gerçekleştirmeyi sağlayacak özelliklerin bulunma düzeyini değerlendirmek için yardımcı bir araçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUNUC, S., ODABASI, H. F., KUZU, A. (2022). Etkili yaşam boyu öğrenme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik & güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 171, 244–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/497443

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adams, D.N. (2007). Lifelong learning skills and attributes: The perceptions of Australian secondary school teachers, Issues in Educational Research, 17, 1-12.
  2. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. NY: Guilford Publications, Inc. Bryce, J. (2006). Schools and lifelong learners. In J. Chapman, P. Cartwright & E.J. McGilp (Eds.), Lifelong learning, participation and equity (pp. 243-263). Dordrecht: Springer. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (12. baskı). Ankara:
  3. PegemA Yayıncılık. Candy, P.C., Crebert, G. and O'Leary, J. (1994). Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education (Commissioned Report No. 28). Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training. Comrey, A. L., and Lee, H. B. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
  4. Costello, A. B., and Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
  5. Coşkun, Y. D. and Demirel, M. (2010). Lifelong learning tendency scale: the study of validity and reliability. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2343-2350.
  6. Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P. and Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: the ELLI Project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247-272.
  7. Cropley, A.J. and Dave, R.H. (1978). Lifelong education and the training of teachers. Pergamon, Oxford. Crow, S. R. (2006). What motivates a lifelong earner?. School Libraries Worldwide, 12(1), 22-34.
  8. De La Harpe, B. and Radloff, A. (2000). Informed teachers and learners: The importance of assessing the characteristics needed for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 169-182.
  9. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Applied Social Research Methods Series Volume 26, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Dinevski, D. and Dinevski, I. V. (2004). The concepts of university lifelong learning provision in Europe. Transition Studies Review, 11(3), 227-235.
  10. Dowling, D., Dowling, S., Dowling, C., Fisser, P., Grabowska, A., Hezemans, M., Kendall, M. and et al. (2004). Lifelong Learning in the Digital Age (Focus Group Report). IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 137, 1-49.
  11. Dunn, E. (2003). Life through learning; Learning through life, the lifelong learning strategy for Scotland