Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2014 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 172

Türkiye'de sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin fen başarısına öğrenci ve sınıf faktörlerinin çok düzeyli etkileri

The multilevel effects of student and classroom factors on the science achievement of eighth graders in Turkey

Pages
108–120
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the analysis showed that while teacher collaboration and inquiry-related activities do not have a statistically significant effect; class average-engagement and readiness to learn have a significant effect on science achievement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the science achievement of eighth graders in Turkey in terms of the relationship of science achievement with the selected student- and classroom-level variables, and modeled the relationship among these variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The TIMSS 2011 data were used for this purpose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the analysis showed that while teacher collaboration and inquiry-related activities do not have a statistically significant effect; class average-engagement and readiness to learn have a significant effect on science achievement.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated the science achievement of eighth graders in Turkey in terms of the relationship of science achievement with the selected student- and classroom-level variables, and modeled the relationship among these variables. The TIMSS 2011 data were used for this purpose. A hierarchical linear model was used to analyze the data. The results of the analysis revealed that the variance in science achievement among eighth- grade classrooms is statistically significant. The variance is about 32%. The result also showed that while attitudes towards science and parents’ level of education are positively related to science achievement, student engagement has no relation with science achievement. Furthermore, the analysis showed that while teacher collaboration and inquiry-related activities do not have a statistically significant effect; class average-engagement and readiness to learn have a significant effect on science achievement.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen başarısını öğrenci ve sınıf düzeyindeki değişkenlerle ilişkisi bakımından incelemekte; bu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi modellemektedir. Bu amaçla TIMSS 2011 uygulamasından elde edilen veriler HLM (hierarchical linear model) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda sekizinci sınıflar arasında fen başarı varyansının %32 olup istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca, fene ilişkin tutum ve ebeveynlerin eğitim durumunun fen başarısı ile pozitif yönde bir ilişkisi olduğu; ancak öğrencilerin derse katılımı ile fen başarıları arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olmadığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, öğretmen işbirliğinin ve araştırmaya dayalı etkinliklerin fen başarısı üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmazken; öğrencilerin derse katılımına ilişkin sınıf ortalamasının ve öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluğun fen başarısı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YETİŞİR, M. İ. (2022). Türkiye'de sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin fen başarısına öğrenci ve sınıf faktörlerinin çok düzeyli etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 172, 108–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/497438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adams, J. (2000). Taking Charge of the Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
  2. Arnaud, C. (2004). Parental education and child’s education: A natural experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1153, Institute for the Study of Labor, Germany. Atar, H. Y. & Atar, B. (2012). Investigating the Multilevel Effects of Several Variables on Turkish Students’ Science Achievements on TIMSS. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(2), 115-126.
  3. Avalos, B. (1998). School-based teacher development: The experience of teacher professional groups in secondary school s in Chile. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14 (3), 257-271.
  4. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A. & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. Research Report 637. London: DfES and University of Bristol. Brown, L. J., Beardslee, W. H., & Prothrow, D. ( 2008). Impact of school breakfast on children’s health and learning: An analysis of the scientific research. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard School of Public Health. Retrieved June 21, 2013 from Ceylan, E. & Berberoglu, G. (2007). Öğrencilerin Fen Başarısını Açıklayan Etmenler: Bir Modelleme Çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(144), 36-48.
  5. Chang, M., Singh, K., & Mo, Y. (2007). Science engagement and science achievement: Longitudinal models using NELS data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(4), 349–371.
  6. Chepete, P., (2008). Modeling of the Factors Affecting Mathematical Achievement of Form 1 Students in Botswana Based on the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. PhD study. Indiana University Bloomington, IN. Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., & Gennaro, L. D. (2006). Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 10, 323–337.
  7. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.
  8. Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
  9. Hamilton, L. et al. (2003). Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: an example from mathematics and science. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25 (1), 1–29.
  10. Hammouri, H.A.M. (2004). Attitudinal and motivational variables related to mathematics achievement in Jordan: Findings