SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2014 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 174

Adapting of Inviting/Disinviting Index into Turkish *

Davet/Engel İndeksinin Türkçe'ye Uyarlanması

Dekant KIRAN
Semra SUNGUR
Pages
119–128
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regression analysis indicated that factors of the IDI were positive predictors of students' self-efficacy as measured by Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present study was to examine adaptability of Inviting/Disinviting Index with 10 items in two factors into Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the specified purpose, the instrument was first, translated into Turkish, then 3 separate pilot studies were conducted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regression analysis indicated that factors of the IDI were positive predictors of students' self-efficacy as measured by Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine adaptability of Inviting/Disinviting Index with 10 items in two factors into Turkish. For the specified purpose, the instrument was first, translated into Turkish, then 3 separate pilot studies were conducted. In the first pilot study, based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analyses, two items were identified as candidates for item deletion. In the second pilot study, due to validity concerns, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine whether alternative factor structures exist in the presence of these two items. The EFA provided evidence for twofactor structure with 10 items. Finally, in the third pilot study, CFA supported two-factor structure of Turkish version of the IDI. Mean interitem correlations were deemed acceptable. In addition, one of the items was found to be non-invariant across gender. The twofactor IDI was found to be invariant across gender permitting the loading of this item to vary. Regression analysis indicated that factors of the IDI were positive predictors of students' self-efficacy as measured by Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı 10 maddeden oluşan 2 faktörlü Davet/Engel İndeksi'ni (DEİ) Türkçe'ye adapte etmektir. Bu amaçla ölçek öncelikle Türkçe'ye çevrilmiş daha sonra 3 ayrı pilot çalışma yapılmıştır. İlk pilot çalışmada yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ve güvenilirlik çalışması sonuçları 2 maddenin çıkarılabileceğini göstermiştir. İkinci pilot çalışmada, bu iki maddenin geçerliğe katkısı düşünülerek, bu maddelerin varlığında alternatif faktör yapılarının varlığı araştırılmıştır. Açıklayıcı faktör analizi (EFA) sonuçları 2 faktörlü yapıya işaret etmiştir. Üçüncü pilot çalışmada yapılan DFA sonuçları da 2 faktörlü yapıyı desteklemiştir. Maddelerarası ortalama korelasyon değerleri iç tutarlığın yeterli düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir Yapılan ölçme değişmezliği analizi, bir maddenin kızlar ve erkekler için değişmezlik göstermediğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu maddeye ait yük cinsiyet bakımından serbest bırakıldığında, 2-faktörlü yapının kızlar ve erkekler için aynı olduğunu ortaya koymuştır. Ayrıca, DEİ ya ait 2 faktörün öğrencilerin Öğrenmede Güdüsel Stratejiler Anketi ile ölçülen öz-yeterlik algılarını pozitif olarak yordadığı bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, D., SUNGUR, S. (2022). Adapting of Inviting/Disinviting Index into Turkish *. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 174, 119–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/497435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485-499.
  2. Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
  3. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
  4. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27
  5. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
  6. Graham, J. M., Guthrie, A. C., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 142-153.
  7. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8 user's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software. Kıran, D. & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students' science self-efficacy and its sources: Examination of gender difference, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 619-630.
  8. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. 1985. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self- concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
  9. Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, don'ts, and how-to's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 97-110.
  10. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pajares, F. (1994). Inviting self-efficacy: The role of invitations in the development of confidence and competence in writing. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice 3,13-24.
  11. Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W.J. (1993) Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53, 810-813.
  12. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R. and L. S. Wrightsman (1991). 'Criter