Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

THE FACULTY TECHNOLOGY MENTORING PROGRAM IN TERMS OFTRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING THEORY

Öğretim Elemanı Teknoloji Danışmanlığı Programı: Dönüştürücü Öğrenme Kuramı Bakış Açısı İle Mesleki Gelişim Sürecini İnceleme

Pages
92–110
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, within the framework of the professional development activitiy carried out regarding technology use, it was found that the participant experienced transformation from the phase of self-­-examination to the phase of developing self-­-confidence and competency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Considering the 10 phases found in Mezirow's (1994) transformative learning theory, the purpose of the present study was to describe the professional development process of a faculty member who took part in a technology counseling program at Education Faculty of a state university in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using the one-­-on-­-one method and conducted with one faculty member (mentee) from the Education Faculty of a state university and one doctorate student (mentor) attending a doctorate program in the department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies at the same faculty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, within the framework of the professional development activitiy carried out regarding technology use, it was found that the participant experienced transformation from the phase of self-­-examination to the phase of developing self-­-confidence and competency.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Considering the 10 phases found in Mezirow's (1994) transformative learning theory, the purpose of the present study was to describe the professional development process of a faculty member who took part in a technology counseling program at Education Faculty of a state university in Turkey. The study was carried out with the qualitative research design. Using the one-­-on-­-one method and conducted with one faculty member (mentee) from the Education Faculty of a state university and one doctorate student (mentor) attending a doctorate program in the department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies at the same faculty. In this respect, the mentee and the mentor met once a week in the mentee's office. The research data were collected with the semi-­-structured interview method and with researcher's journals (günlükler: diaries). In literature, descriptive analysis was conducted within the framework of Mezirow's 10 transformative phases. In the study, within the framework of the professional development activitiy carried out regarding technology use, it was found that the participant experienced transformation from the phase of self-­-examination to the phase of developing self-­-confidence and competency. In addition, it was concluded that the participant's personal development was also supported within the scope of the activity carried out for the participant's professional development.

Özet

Gerçekleştirilen araştırmada Türkiye'de bir devlet üniversitesinin Eğitim Fakültesi'nde gerçekleştirilen teknoloji danışmanlığı programına katılan bir öğretim üyesinin, Mezirow' un (1994) dönüştürücü öğrenme kuramında yer alan on aşamaya göre mesleki gelişim sürecini betimlemek amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma nitel araştırma deseni çerçevesinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma bir devlet üniversitesinin Eğitim Fakültesi'nde görev yapan bir öğretim üyesi (menti) ile aynı fakültede Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi'de doktora eğitimi alan bir uzmanın (mentör) birebir mentörlük uygulaması ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda menti ve mentör haftada bir gün mentinin odasında toplanmışlardır. Araştırma verileri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme ve araştırmacı günlükleri ile toplanmıştır. Alanyazında Mezirow'un 10 dönüşüm aşaması çerçevesinde betimsel analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada teknoloji kullanımına yönelik gerçekleştirilen mesleki gelişim etkinliği çerçevesinde katılımcının öz inceleme aşamasından yeterlik ve özgüven oluşturma aşamasına kadar bir dönüşüm yaşadığı ortaya koyulmuştur. Ayrıca katılımcının mesleki gelişim etkinliklerine yönelik gerçekleştirilen etkinlik kapsamında katılımcının kişisel gelişiminin de desteklendiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDAKUL, I. K., İZMİRLİ, Ö. Ş., ÖRÜN, Ö. (2022). THE FACULTY TECHNOLOGY MENTORING PROGRAM IN TERMS OFTRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING THEORY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 92–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/497285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akteke Öztük, B., Arı, F., Kubuş, O., Gürbüz, T., ve Çağıltay, K. (2008). Öğretim Teknolojileri Destek Ofisleri ve Üniversitedeki Roller. Akademik Bilişim 2008, (Bildiri kitapçığı No:101). Çanakkale. Allen, G. (2008). Practicing teachers and web 2.0 technologies: Possibilities for transformative learning. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Columbia University, New York. Balcı, A. (2001). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeleri (5. Baskı). Ankara:
  2. PegemA Yayıncılık. Balmer, D. F., ve Richards, B. F. (2012). Faculty development as transformation: Lessons learned from a process-oriented program. Teaching and learning in medicine, 24(3), 242-247.
  3. Brock, S. E. (2010). Measuring the importance of precursor steps to transformative learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2), 122-142.
  4. Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning; a guide for educators of adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research designs: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27(2), 197-215.
  5. Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. ET Magazine, 42(1), 5-13.
  6. Fraenkel, J. R. ve Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. Gravett, S. (2004). Action research and transformative learning in teaching development. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 259-272.
  7. Griswold, W. (2007). Transformative learning in a post-totalitarian context: Professional development among school teachers in rural Siberia. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Kansas State University, Kansas. Hamza, A. (2010). International experience an opportunity for professional development in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(1), 50-69.
  8. Jelfs, A., & Colbourn, C. (2002). Virtual seminars and their impact on the role of the teaching staff. Computers & Education, 38(1), 127-136.
  9. Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (2011). An Evaluative Case Study on Professional Competency of Preservice Information Technology Teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3). Kabakçı, I, Odabaşı, H. F. ve Kılıçer, K. (2010). Transformative learning based mentoring for professional development of teacher educators in information and communication technologies: an approach for an emerging country. Professional Development in Educati