Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF LECTURE CAPTURE SYSTEM USE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TERMS OF STUDENTS

YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE DERS YAKALAMA SİSTEMİNİN (DYS) KULLANIMININÖĞRENCİ AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
590–607
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that students find LC approach functional and useful,especially for reviewing the content before exams, and making up for missed classes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to changing needs at global and national level, there are currently greater than everexpectations from technology-enhanced teaching approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To meet these expectations,universities have been experimenting with different teaching approaches and applications.One of these approaches and applications is Lecture Capture (LC).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that students find LC approach functional and useful,especially for reviewing the content before exams, and making up for missed classes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Due to changing needs at global and national level, there are currently greater than everexpectations from technology-enhanced teaching approaches. To meet these expectations,universities have been experimenting with different teaching approaches and applications.One of these approaches and applications is Lecture Capture (LC). LC is used to enablestudents to access their lectures both synchronously and asynchronously, and to use them ina way that best meets their needs. The aim of this study is to identify the current situation ata university in which the lecture capture approach is in use, by investigating students’perceptions on three areas of the LC system: its usefulness, its purpose, and itsconstraints/difficulties. Results indicated that students find LC approach functional and useful,especially for reviewing the content before exams, and making up for missed classes. Theresults also showed that the most commonly perceived constraint was technical problems inaccessing the videos. The study suggests that further research should focus on pedagogicalvalues of technology-enhanced teaching approaches.

Özet

Son zamanlarda küresel ve ulusal ölçekte hissedilen ihtiyaçlar ve zorunluluklar nedeniyle teknolojiye dayalı öğretim yaklaşımlarının kullanılmasına ilişkin beklentiler artmış; üniversiteler bu beklentileri karşılamak için farklı uygulama arayışı içine girmişlerdir. Ders Yakalama Sistemi (DYS) bu uygulamalardan birisidir ve amacı, öğretim elemanının, çevrimiçi olarak ya da ders kayıtlarında gerekli gördüğü değişiklikleri yaptıktan sonra dersini, öğrenci erişimine açarak öğrencinin kendi ihtiyacı doğrultusunda bilgiye ulaşmasını ve tekrar etmesini sağlamaktır. Bu çalışmada, bir yükseköğretim kurumundaki öğrencilerin DYS’yi kullanım amaçları, DYS’ye ilişkin yarar algıları ve DYS kullanımı ile ilgili algıladıkları kısıtlılıklara ilişkin görüşlerinin betimlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, öğrencilerin DYS sistemini işlevsel ve yararlı bulduklarını, en çok sınavdan önce konuları gözden geçirmek, derste kaçırdığı ya da derse gelemediği durumlarda öğrenme eksikliklerini kapatmak için kullandıklarını ancak sisteme ulaşımda yaşadıkları en önemli kısıtlılığın teknik aksaklıklar olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, teknolojiye dayalı öğretim yaklaşımlarının daha fazla önem kazandığı ve kullanıldığı günümüzde söz konusu yaklaşımların pedagojik değerini ön plana çıkaran araştırmaların yürütülmesini önermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

USLU, N. A., MUMCU, F., ÜSTÜNLÜOĞLU, E. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF LECTURE CAPTURE SYSTEM USE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TERMS OF STUDENTS. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 590–607. https://ajindex.com/articles/497243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ashrafi, A., Zareravasan, A., Savoji, S. R., & Amani, M. (2020): Exploring factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use the learning management system (LMS): a multi-perspective framework, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.173402. Al Nashash, H., ve Gunn, C. (2013). Lecture capture in engineering classes: Bridging gaps and enhancing learning. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 69-78.
  2. Aldamen, H., Al-Esmail, R., ve Hollindale, J. (2015). Does lecture capturing impact student performance and attendance in an introductory accounting course?. Accounting Education, 24(4), 291-317.
  3. Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., ve Gutwin, C. (2014). Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education, 75, 282-292.
  4. Danielson, J., Preast, V., Bender, H., ve Hassall, L. (2014). Is the effectiveness of lecture capture related to teaching approach or content type. Computers & Education, 72, 121-131.
  5. Dommett, E. J., Gardner, B., ve van Tilburg, W. (2019). Staff and student views of lecture capture: A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16:23. Dommeyer, C. J. (2017). Lecture capturing: Its effects on students' absenteeism, performance, and impressions in a traditional marketing research course. Journal of Education for Business, 92(8), 388-395.
  6. Dona, K. L., Gregory, J., ve Pechenkina, E. (2017). Lecture-recording technology in higher education: Exploring lecturer and student views across the disciplines. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 122-133.
  7. Dinmore, S. (2019). Beyond lecture capture: Creating digital video content for online learning – a case study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1), 7, 1-10.
  8. Edwards, M. R., ve Clinton, M. E. (2019). A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. High Educ, 77, 403–421.
  9. Elliott, C., ve Neal, D. (2016). Evaluating the use of lecture capture using a revealed preference approach. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 153-167.
  10. Evans, G., ve Luke, K. (2020). Lecture capture and peer working: exploring study practices through staff–student partnerships. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1-13.
  11. Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., ve Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive busi