Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Psychometric Properties of Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale for Graduate Students and Investigating Academic Dishonesty Tendency Levels with CHAID Analysis

Pages
86–104
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the most significant variable explaining the Academic Dishonesty Tendency of the students is the level of graduate education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The number of unethical academic dishonesty behaviours is increasing with each day in higher education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The only significant variable explaining the students’ Tendency Towards Cheating was found to be the level of graduate education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the most significant variable explaining the Academic Dishonesty Tendency of the students is the level of graduate education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Academic dishonesty · CHAID analysis · graduate education

Abstract

The number of unethical academic dishonesty behaviours is increasing with each day in higher education. Thus, it is important to determine the level of the behaviour of academic dishonesty in the education system, the tendencies of students to perform this behaviour, and the individuals who have a tendency to show this behaviour in advance. The research has two different aims. The first one is to determine the psychometric properties of the Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale (ADTS) originally developed for undergraduate students, not for graduate students. The second aim is to investigate the variables that best explain the academic dishonesty tendency levels of the students who continue their graduate education by using the CHAID analysis method. As a result of the analyses, it was determined that the Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale is also a valid and reliable measurement tool for graduate students. The only significant variable explaining the students’ Tendency Towards Cheating was found to be the level of graduate education. It was also determined that the most important variable affecting the “dishonesty tendency at studies as homework, project, etc.–common” is the level of graduate education. The only significant variable explaining the “dishonesty tendency at research and process of write up” was found to be the reason for receiving graduate education. The most significant variable explaining the “dishonesty tendency towards reference” of the students was found to be the level of graduate education. It was determined that the most significant variable explaining the Academic Dishonesty Tendency of the students is the level of graduate education.

🔖

Cite This Article

NARTGÜN, Z., ÖZMERCAN, E. E., POLAT, B. (2022). Psychometric Properties of Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale for Graduate Students and Investigating Academic Dishonesty Tendency Levels with CHAID Analysis. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 86–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/497141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adıbatmaz, M., & Kurnaz, F. B. (2017). Karabük Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu’nda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin kopya çekme tutumlarının incelenmesi [Examination of cheating attitudes of students in the Vocational School of Health Sciences in Karabük University]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 1061-1078. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.31178-338807
  2. Akbaşlı, S., Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Kubilay, S. (2019). Relationship between prospective teachers’ deontic justice attitudes and academic dishonesty tendencies. South African Journal of Education, 39(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n3a1622
  3. Akdağ, M., & Güneş, H. (2002). Kopya çekme davranışları ve kopya çekmeye ilişkin tutumlar [Cheating behaviors and attitudes toward cheating]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 31(31), 330-334. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10366/126879
  4. Alkan, Ş. (2008). İlköğretim ikinci kademe ile ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin kopya çekmeye ilişkin görüşleri [The view of the students and the teachers about cheating in the second level of the primary education and secondary education] (Thesis No. 221680) [Unpublished master thesis, Fırat Üniversity]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  5. Aluede, O., Omoregie, E. O., & Osa-Edoh, G. I. (2006). Academic dishonesty as a contemporary problem in higher education: How academic advisers can help. Reading Improvement, 43(2), 97-106. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA148856041&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00340510&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E103957e8
  6. Aydın, S., & Güllü, M. (2021). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenliği bölümü öğrencilerinin kopya çekmeye yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi: Bir karma yöntem araştırması [Investigation of attitudes of physical education and sports education department students towards cheating: A mixed methods research]. International Sport Sciences Student Studies Journal, 3(2), 1-9. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/i4s/issue/67772/1039339 Ayoub/Al-Salim, M. I., & Aladwan, K. (2021). The relationship between academic integrity of online university students and its effects on academic performance and learning quality. Journal of Ethics, Entrepreneurship and Technology, 1(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEET-02-2021-0009 Baran L., & Jonason, P. K. (2020). Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-effic