Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Examination of ContextBased Question Writing Skills of Science Teachers Participated in a Scientific Literacy Course

Fen OkuryazarlığıKursuna Katılan Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin BağlamTemelli Soru Yazma Becerilerinin İncelenmesi

Pages
1249–1270
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that developing more context-based questions by teachers will decrease the deficiencies identified in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, an in-depth examination of teachers’ context-based question writing skills in the scientific literacycourse developed for science teachers was aimed.In the study, a case study model from qualitative research was used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of 25 science teachers working in middleschools in Bursa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that developing more context-based questions by teachers will decrease the deficiencies identified in the study.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, an in-depth examination of teachers’ context-based question writing skills in the scientific literacycourse developed for science teachers was aimed.In the study, a case study model from qualitative research was used. The study group consists of 25 science teachers working in middleschools in Bursa. Teachers were given theoretical and practical context-based question writing training on the basis of scientific literacydeveloped by the researchers. Questionsand observation were used as data collection tools in the study. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The findings from the study showed that teachers learned context-based question structures that measure scientific literacy. Although teachers hadsome deficiencies in writing context-based question, it wasunderstood that their ability to write questions hadimproved throughthe scientific literacy course. We concluded that developing more context-based questions by teachers will decrease the deficiencies identified in the study.

Özet

Fen okuryazarlığının günümüzdeki önemine paralel olarak, bağlamtemelli sorular ölçme-değerlendirme sistemlerinde yer almaya başlamıştır. Bu önem göz önüne alınarak yapılan çalışmada, fen bilimleri öğretmenlerine yönelik geliştirilen fen okuryazarlık kursunda, öğretmenlerin bağlamtemelli soru yazma becerilernin derinlemesine incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Çalışmada, nitel araştırmalardan durum çalışması modeli kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubunu, Bursa iline bağlı ortaokullarda görev yapan 25 fen bilimleri öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Öğretmenlere, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen fen okuryazarlığı temeline yönelik bağlamtemelli soru yazımı teorik ve uygulamalı eğitim verilmiştir. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak “ulusal ve uluslararası sorulardan oluşan form”, “yapılandırılmamış gözlemler” ve “öğretmenler tarafından hazırlanan bağlamtemelli açık uçlu sorular” kullanılmıştır. Veriler betimsel analiz kullanılarak analizedilmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre; öğretmenlerin, fen okuryazarlığını ölçen bağlamtemelli soru yapılarını öğrendikleri anlaşılmıştır. Bununla birlikte öğretmenlerin bağlamtemelli soru yazmada bazı eksikleri olmasına rağmen, verilen eğitime paralel olarak soru yazma becerilerinin geliştiği anlaşılmıştır. Çalışmada belirlenen eksikliklerin, daha fazla bağlamtemellisoru hazırlayarak azalacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEPNİ, S., ORMANCI, Ü., ÜLGER, B. B. (2022). Examination of ContextBased Question Writing Skills of Science Teachers Participated in a Scientific Literacy Course. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 1249–1270. https://ajindex.com/articles/496948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acar, T., & Öğretmen, T. (2012). Analysis of 2006 PISA science performance via multilevel statistical methods. Education and Science, 37(163), 178-189.
  2. Aktaş, İ., & Ceylan, E. (2016). Determination of pre-service science teachers’ science process skills and investigating of relationship with general academic achievement. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(33), 123-136.
  3. Anagün, Ş. S. (2011). The impact of teaching-learning process variables to the students’ scientific literacy levels based on PISA 2006 results. Education and Science, 36(162), 84-102.
  4. Aslan, C. (2011). Effects of teaching applications for developing question asking skills on question forming skills of prospective teachers. Education and Science, 36(160), 236-249.
  5. Berber, A., & Anılan, B. (2018). Examination of opinions of the prospective teachers on questions in science field in secondary education exams in the last ten years. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(27), 203-224.
  6. Biber, A. C., Tuna, A., Uysal, R., & Kabuklu, U. N. (2018). Supporting and training course teachers’ opinions on sample mathematics questions of the high school entrance exam. Asian Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 63-80.
  7. Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26.
  8. Çepni, S. (2019). Introduction to research and project studies. Trabzon: Celepler Publishing. Çepni, S. (2020). SÇ new face 8th grade science lgs essays -1 (Edt.). Denizli: OrEgDa Publishing. Chin, C. C. (2005). First‐year pre‐service teachers in Taiwan—Do they enter the teacher program with satisfactory scientific literacy and attitudes toward science? International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1549-1570.
  9. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
  10. Döş, İ., & Atalmış, E. H. (2016). Evaluating of PISA results based on OECD data. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(2), 432-450.
  11. Duban, N. (2010). Opinions of primary school prospective teachers about science and technology literate and education these individuals. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 3(2), 162-174.
  12. Elmas, R., & Eryılmaz, A. (2015). How to write good quality contextual science questions: Criteria and myths. Journal of Theoretical Educational Scie