SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Bilim Toplum / 2018 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 62

From Proletariat to Precariat: A New Global Class (!)

Proleteryadan Prekaryaya: Yeni Bir Küresel Sınıf (!)

Yeliz SARIÖZ GÖKTEN
Pages
28–45
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, discussions will be held on labor process and the role of the precariat in the neoliberal order.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While the oil crisis brought the end of the Keynesian welfare state and for distproduction system, the capitalist order was restructured by neoliberalism and post-fordism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this process, the functions of the state have reduced and the sphere of free market has reached its highest level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, discussions will be held on labor process and the role of the precariat in the neoliberal order.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

While the oil crisis brought the end of the Keynesian welfare state and for distproduction system, the capitalist order was restructured by neoliberalism and post-fordism. In this process, the functions of the state have reduced and the sphere of free market has reached its highest level. Knowledge and technology-based production has become essential with the post-fordist production system, the evolution of labor processes gained momentum. In this new accumulation regime, the labor market was deregulated, the unions were weakened, a precarious and flexible employment system was adopted. This new labor process is interpreted as the proletarian class will be replaced by a new global class of precariat. In this study, discussions will be held on labor process and the role of the precariat in the neoliberal order.

Özet

Petrol krizi, kapitalist sistemde Keynesyen refah devleti ve fordist üretim sisteminin sonunuhazırlarken neoliberal düzen ve post fordizm ile düzen yeniden biçimlenmiştir. Bu süreçtedevletin fonksiyonları daraltılmış, serbest piyasa ulaşabileceği en yüksek düzeyine erişmiştir.Post fordist üretim sistemi ile bilgi temelli ve teknolojiye dayalı üretim esas olurken emeksüreçlerinin evrimi ivme kazanmıştır. Bu yeni birikim rejiminde emek piyasası deregüle edilmiş,sendikaların ağırlığı zayıflatılmış, güvencesiz ve esnek bir istihdam sürecine geçilmiştir. Buyeni emek süreci proleter sınıfın yerini yeni küresel bir prekarya sınıfının alacağı şeklindeyorumlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada neoliberal düzende emek süreçleri ve prekaryanın rolü üzerinetartışmalar yapılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTEN, Y. S. (2022). From Proletariat to Precariat: A New Global Class (!). Eğitim Bilim Toplum, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 62, 28–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/496710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Allen, K. (2009),. “Social Partnership and Union revitalizatiuon: The Irish Case”, In G. Gall (eds) The Future of Union Organisaing, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp: 43-53.
  2. Arnold, D./J. Pickles (2011). “Global Work, Surplus Labor, And The Precarious Economies Of The Border”, Antipode,Vol. 43 No. 5 2011 ISSN 0066-4812, pp: 1598–1624.
  3. Arnold, D./J. Bongiovi (2013). “Precarious, Informalizing And Flexible Work: Transforming Concepts And Understanding”, American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3): 289-308.
  4. Breman, Jan (2013). “A Bogus Concept?”, New Left Review, No. 84, pp: 130-138.
  5. Clarke, S. (1990). “The Crisis of Fordismand the Crisis of Capitalism”, Telos, New York, 83, Spring, pp: 71– 98. Doogan, K. (2009). New Capitalism? The Transformation of Work, Polity Press,
  6. Cambridge. Frase, P. (2013). “The Precariat: A Class Or A Condition?”, New Labor Forum, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 11-14.
  7. Freeman, R. (2006). The Great Doubling: The Challenge of the New Global Labor Market https://eml.berkeley.edu/~webfac/eichengreen/e183_sp07/ great_doub.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.08.2018).
  8. Fudge, J./ R. Owens (2006). “Precarious Work, Women, And The New Economy: The Challenge To Legal Norms”, İçinde Precarius Work, Women And The New Economy, Edited by Judy Fudge and Rosemary Owens, Hart Press, Oxford, pp: 3-27.
  9. Hardt, M. ve A. Negri (2009).
  10. Commonwealth, Harvard Univ. Press.
  11. Harvey, D. (1992). The Condition of Postmodernity An Enquiry Into The Origins Of Cultural Change, Blackwell Press.
  12. Jessop B. (1992). “Fordism And Post Fordism a Critical Reformulation”, İçinde Pathways To Industrialization And Regional Development, Edited by Allen J. Scott, Michael Storper, Routledge Press, pp: 42-62.
  13. Kalleberg, A. (2009). “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations In Transition”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 74, No. 1 (Feb., 2009), pp. 1-22.
  14. Marx, K. ve F. E. (2014).
  15. Komünist Manifesto, Çeviren Nail Satlıgan, 2. Baskı,
  16. Yordam Kitap, İstanbul.
  17. Mitropouslos, A. (2005). “Precari-us?”, http://www.metamute.org/editorial/ articles/precari-us (Erişim Tarihi: 15.07.2018).
  18. Moody, K. (2016). “Precariat, Gigariat, or 21st Century Proletariat? U.S. Labor What’s New, What’s Not.”, Against the Current, Vol. 31, Issue 182, p: 16-22.
  19. Morton, A. D. (2003). “Social Forces in the Struggle over Hegemony: NeoGramscian Perspectives in International Political Economy”, Rethinking Marxism, Vol: 15, No: 2, pp: 153-179.
  20. Munck, R. (2013). “The Precariat: A View From The South”, Third World Quarterly, 34:5, 747-762,