Journals / Eğitim Bilim Toplum / 2018 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 62

Political Economic Perspective to Olympic and World Cup Organisations

Olimpiyat ve Dünya Kupası Organizasyonlarına Ekonomi-Politik Bakış

Pages
74–94
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important result of the study is that the Olympic Games and World Cup organizations have placed in the network of global capital as a capital valuation area and have not financed by public resources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:International sport organizations have contain many political and economic debates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first decades of 2000s, while BRICS countries (Brasil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and developing countries were hosting host organizations, in the next decades these organizations are headed back to the central countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important result of the study is that the Olympic Games and World Cup organizations have placed in the network of global capital as a capital valuation area and have not financed by public resources.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

International sport organizations have contain many political and economic debates. Especially the organizations such as Olympics and World Cup that have an impact on life of billions much or less are issues that need further consideration by socio-economic perspective. The aim of the study is to understand and explain the changes in the economy of the host cities and countries by evaluating international sport organizations within the framework of global politics and economic relations. In the first decades of 2000s, while BRICS countries (Brasil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and developing countries were hosting host organizations, in the next decades these organizations are headed back to the central countries. This situation can be interpreted as the expectations of big sport organizations are in decline. As shown in the study, a political dimension with an economic axis has gone beyond the ideals of sporting competition in these organizations. The most important result of the study is that the Olympic Games and World Cup organizations have placed in the network of global capital as a capital valuation area and have not financed by public resources.

Özet

Uluslararası spor organizasyonları, siyasal ve ekonomik tartışmaları bünyesinde fazlasıylabarındırmaktadır. Özellikle Olimpiyatlar ve Dünya Kupası gibi dünya çapında milyarlarcakişinin hayatlarına az veya çok temas eden organizasyonlar, siyasal ekonominin daha fazlaincelemesi gereken konulardır. Çalışmanın amacı, uluslararası sportif organizasyonlarınıküresel siyaset ve ekonomik ilişkiler çerçevesinde değerlendirip, ev sahibi kent ve ülkelerinekonomisinde yaşanan değişimi anlamak ve açıklamaktır. 2000’lerin başında BRICS ülkeleri(Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin ve Güney Afrika) ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler organizasyonlaraev sahipliği yaparken, ev sahiplikleri önümüzdeki on yıllarda yeniden merkez ülkelereyönelmektedir. Bu durum, büyük sportif organizasyonların yarattığı beklentilerin düşüşteolduğu şeklinde yorumlanabilir. Çalışmada gösterildiği gibi bu organizasyonlarda ekonomikeksenli bir siyasal boyut, sportif yarışma ideallerinin çok ötesine geçmiştir. Çalışmanın enönemli sonucu, Olimpiyat ve Dünya Kupası organizasyonlarının kamu kaynaklarıyla finanseedilmekten vazgeçilip bir sermaye değerleme alanı olarak küresel sermayenin ilişki ağı içindekiyerini aldığıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, Y., GÖKTEN, K. (2022). Political Economic Perspective to Olympic and World Cup Organisations. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 62, 74–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/496705

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abrams, Roger I. (2013). Playing Tough: The World of Sports and Politics, Northeastern University Press.
  2. Ak, D. (2015). “Olimpiyat Oyunlarının Ev Sahibi Kente Etkileri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies, 2: 1, 1-19.
  3. Alegi, P. (2008). “A Nation To Be Reckoned With’: The Politics of World Cup Stadium Construction in Cape Town and Durban, South Africa”, African Studies, 67:3, 397-422.
  4. Andrews, D. (2016). “Sport, Spectacle and The Politics of Late Capitalism”, Routledge Handbook of Sport and Politics, Routledge. Baade R. A. ve Matheson V. (2016). “Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30: 2, 201–218.
  5. Bauman R. vd. (2010). “The Labor Market Effects of the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics”, College of the Holy Cross Research Series, No. 10-02.
  6. Bauman R. ve Matheson V. (2013). “Infrastructure Investments and MegaSports Events: Comparing the Experience of Developing and Industrialized Countries”, College of the Holy Cross Faculty Research Series, No. 13-05.
  7. Billings S. B. ve Holladay J. S. (2011). “Should Cities Go For The Gold? The Long Term Impacts Of Hosting The Olympics”, Economic Inquiry,50:3, 754-772.
  8. Chavez N. (2016). “Olympic Games RIO 2016-Economic Legacy”, Olympic News, 16 March. Cornelissen, S. (2007). “Crafting Legacies: The Changing Political Economy of Global Sport and the 2010 FIFA World Cup™”, Politikon, 34:3, 241- 259. Cornelissen, S. ve Swart, K. (2006). “The 2010 Football World Cup As A Political Construct: The Challenge Of Making Good On An African Promise”, The Sociological Review, 54:2, 108-123.
  9. Espy, R. (1981).
  10. The Politics of the Olympic Games, University of California Press.
  11. Flyvbjerg, B. ve Stewart A. (2012). “Olympic Proportions: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Olympics 1960-2012”, Said Business School University Oxford Working Paper, 1-23.
  12. Gold, J. R. ve Gold, M. M. (2008). “Olympic Cities: Regeneration, City Rebranding and Changing Urban Agendas”, Geography Compass, 2:1: 300–318.
  13. Guttmann, A. (1988). “The Cold War and the Olympics”, International Journal, 43:4, 554-568.
  14. Guttmann, A. (1998). “The ‘Nazi Olympics’ and American boycott controversy”, in Pierre Arnaud, and Professor Jim Riordan (eds), The Sport and International Politics: Impact of Facism and Communism on Sport, Routledge. Güzelipek,Y. A. (2017). Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Spor-Tarihe Damgasını Vuran Spor Olayları ve Politik Çözümlemeleri, Cinius. Hall, S. (2018). “Does Hosting A World