SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Bilim Toplum / 2019 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 68

The Concept of Wisdom in Turkish Cultural Context

Bilgelik Kavramının Türkiye Kültüründe İncelenmesi

Burak DOĞRUYOL
Pages
10–26
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings are discussed considering the relevant literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lay perceptions on the content and definition of wisdom were investigated to explore the implicit theories of wisdom in Turkish cultural context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty seven (Mage = 26.41, SD = 2.90) participants were asked to list wisdom related conceptions in an open-ended question.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings are discussed considering the relevant literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Lay perceptions on the content and definition of wisdom were investigated to explore the implicit theories of wisdom in Turkish cultural context. In the first study, classical implicit theories of wisdom approach was used by asking participants to describe their wisdom conceptions. Twenty seven (Mage = 26.41, SD = 2.90) participants were asked to list wisdom related conceptions in an open-ended question. Results revealed 13 higher-order categories. In the second study, 107 (Mage = 21.57, SD = 1.76) participants rated existing categories. Result of the factor analyses revealed two main categories; interactional-affective and contemplative cognitive. Findings are discussed considering the relevant literature.

Özet

Bilgelik kavramının Türk örneklemindeki örtük teorilerini ortaya koymak amacıyla, bilgeliğintanımı ve içeriğinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, birinci çalışmada katılımcılardanbilgeliği tanımlamaları istenmiştir. Yirmiyedi (Ort.yaş = 26.41, SS = 2.90) katılımcıya açıkuçlu bir soru ile bilgeliği tanımlayan kavramları listelemeleri istenmiştir. Sonuçlar 13 farklıkategori olduğunu göstermiştir. İkinci çalışmada 107 (Ort.yaş = 21.57, SS = 1.76) katılımcı ilkçalışmadan elde edilen kategorileri değerlendirmişlerdir. Faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre ikikategori bulunmuştur; etkileşimsel-duygusal ve derin düşünmek-bilişsel. Bulgular, ilgili yazınbağlamında tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRUYOL, B. (2022). The Concept of Wisdom in Turkish Cultural Context. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 68, 10–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/496684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (1990). Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp.121 - 142). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (Pragmatic) to Orcehestrate Mind and Virtue Toward Exellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122-136.
  3. Baltes, P. M., & Staudinger, U. M. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 75-80.
  4. Chandler, M. J., & Holliday, S. (1990). Wisdom in postapocalyptic age. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp.121 - 142). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Csikzentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1990). The psychology of wisdom: An evolutionary interpretation. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp.25 - 52). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricercha di Psicologia, 27, 23 – 40. Gregory, J. R. (2014). Psychological Testing: History, Principles and Applications. (Global Edition). Upper Saddle River, N. J. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Imamoğlu, E. O., & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (1999). 1970’lerden 1990’lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14, 1-18.
  7. Kagitcibasi, C. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications. Routledge. Jordan, J. (2005). The quest for wisdom in adulthood: A psychological perspective. In R. J. Sternberg and J. Jordan (Eds.), A Handbook of Wisdom:Psychological Perspectives (pp. 160-188). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Labouvie-Vief, G. (1990). Wisdom as integrated thought: Historiacal and developmental perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp.52 - 87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Le, T. N., & Levenson, M. R. (2005). Wisdom as self-transcendence: What’s love (& individualism) got to do with it? Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 443-457.
  10. Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., & Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-transcedence: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60, 127-143.
  11. Levitt, H. M. (1999). The development of wisdom: An analysis of Tibetan Buddhist experience. Journal of Humanist