Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

A Resarch on the properties of the kefirs produced from blends of skimmilk powder,whey powder and buttermilk II.Some physical and sensory properties

Süttozu,peyniraltı suyu tozu ve yayıkaltı karışımları ile üretilen kefirlerin özellikleri üzerine bir araştırma II. Bazı fiziksel ve duygusal özellikler

Pages
79–86
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to organoleptic evaluation, it was found that the kefirs made using skim milk powder and, skim milk powder-butter milk had been preferred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this ,study, the physical and sensory properties of kefir samples from produced of kefir grains and kefir culture with different ratios of skimmilk poy/der, whey powder and buttermilk instead of milk were determined at the days of 1th 6th and 9th of strorage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this ,study, the physical and sensory properties of kefir samples from produced of kefir grains and kefir culture with different ratios of skimmilk poy/der, whey powder and buttermilk instead of milk were determined at the days of 1th 6th and 9th of strorage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to organoleptic evaluation, it was found that the kefirs made using skim milk powder and, skim milk powder-butter milk had been preferred.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this ,study, the physical and sensory properties of kefir samples from produced of kefir grains and kefir culture with different ratios of skimmilk poy/der, whey powder and buttermilk instead of milk were determined at the days of 1th 6th and 9th of strorage. According to organoleptic evaluation, it was found that the kefirs made using skim milk powder and, skim milk powder-butter milk had been preferred.

Özet

Bu çalışmada süt yerine süttozu, peyniraltı suyu tozu ve yayıkaltı farklı oranlarda kullanılarak kefir tanesinden ve kültüründen kefir üretimi yapılmıştır. Üretilen örnekler 9 gün süreyle muhafaza edilmiş ve depolamanın 1., 6., ve 9. günlerinde kefirlerin fiziksel ve duyusal özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Duyusal kriterler dikkate alındığında süttozu, süttozu-yayıkaltı kefirlerinin en çok beğenilen kefir örnekleri olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, H., ERSOY, M. (2022). A Resarch on the properties of the kefirs produced from blends of skimmilk powder,whey powder and buttermilk II.Some physical and sensory properties. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 79–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/496576

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akalın, A.S., Gönç, S. 1999. Effect of Viscow Cultures on the Rheological and Sensory Properties, Flavor Substances and Starter Bacteria Counts of Set Yoghurt. Gıda(5): 319-325. 2-Bozkan, B.K. 1989. Süttozu ve Peynir Suyu Tozu Karışımından yapılan Ayranların Özellikleri Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. E.Ü. Fen Bil. Enst. İzmir. 3-De Vrese,M.Keller,B.Barth,C. 1992. Enhancement of Intestinal Hydrolysis of lactose Be Microbial β-Galoctosidase of Kefir. Brit. J. Nut. 67: 67-75. 4-Duitschaever, C.L., Kemp, N., Emlans, D. 1988. Comparative Evaluation of Five Procedures For Making Kefir. Milchwissenschaft 43: 343-345. 5-Halle,C., Leroi, F., Dousset, P.M. 1994. Les Kefirs Des Accosiations Bacteries lactiques –levures, İn Bacteries lactiques; Aspects Fondamentaux et Technologiques. Vol: 2, Uriage, France:lorica 169-182. 6- Jelen, P., Bunchheim, W. 1984. Stability of Whey Protein upon Heating In Acidic Conditions. Milchwissenchaft. 39(4): 215-218. 7-Metin, M., Tavlas, B. 1986. Kefir Tanesi ve Kefir Kültürü Kullanılarak Üretilen Kefirlerin Kalitesi Üzerine Olgunlaşma Koşullarının Etkisi. E.Ü. Müh. Fak. Dergisi, Seri B, 4(1): 51-68. 8- Oysun, G. 1996. Süt ve ürünlerinde Analiz yöntemleri. E.Ü. Zir.Fak.Yay. No:504, İzmir. 9-S.A.S.Institute, 1989. Sasuser’s Guide, Statistics, Version 5. Edition.S.A.S. İns. Inc. Cary, N.C. 10-Tamime, A.Y., Robinson, R.K. 1991.
  2. Yoghurt. Cienciay Tecnologia, Acribia, Spain. 11-Yaygın,H., 1999,
  3. YoğurtTeknolojisi, Akdeniz Üni. Yayın No: 75, sayfa 184-189, Antalya.12-Yöney, Z. 1973. Süt ve Mamülleri Muayene ve Analiz Metodları. A.Ü. Zir. Fak.Yay. No: 451, Ankara.