Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

An integrated measurement model of supply chain flexibility

Tedarik zinciri esnekliğine yönelik bütünleşik bir ölçüm modeli

Pages
511–523
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall supply chain flexibility does not take much consideration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Capability of a supply chain to adapt its activities to rapid changing markets and customer requirements is defined as supply chain flexibility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence, this study tried to develop a measurement model to measure overall integrated supply chain flexibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall supply chain flexibility does not take much consideration.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Capability of a supply chain to adapt its activities to rapid changing markets and customer requirements is defined as supply chain flexibility. It is an inevitable challenge for a supply chain to improve its flexibility in order to improve and maintain competitiveness. In literature, flexibility concept is frequently evaluated from the functional or business unit flexibility point of view. Overall supply chain flexibility does not take much consideration. Hence, this study tried to develop a measurement model to measure overall integrated supply chain flexibility. Measurement model integrates and measures flexibility in three levels of a supply chain (central business unit, first tier supplier and first tier customer) with five dimensions.

Özet

Tedarik zincirlerinin değişen pazarlara ve müşteri isteklerine uyum yeteneğinin ölçüsü tedarik zinciri esnekliği olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Rekabet gücünü arttırmak ve korumak isteyen tedarik zincirlerinin, esneklik düzeylerini geliştirmeleri gerekmektedir. Yazında esneklik kavramı çoğunlukla fonksiyonel açıdan ya da işletme esnekliği olarak ele alınmaktadır. Tedarik zincirinin tümünü göz önünde bulunduran bütünleşik bir tedarik zinciri esnekliği kavramı üzerine yapılan çalışmalara daha az rastlanmaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada tedarik zinciri esnekliğini bütünleşik olarak ölçebilecek bir ölçüm modeli geliştirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Geliştirilen model, tedarik zinciri esnekliğini üç düzeyde (merkez işletme, birinci düzey tedarikçi ve birinci düzey müşteri) ve beş boyutta ölçmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPOYAN, M. (2022). An integrated measurement model of supply chain flexibility. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 511–523. https://ajindex.com/articles/495495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bal, C. ve Özdamar, K. (2004) “Eksik Gözlem Sorununun Türetilmiş Veri Setleri Yardımıyla Çözümlenmesi” Osmangazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2):67-76.
  2. Duclos, L. K., Vokurka, R. J. ve Lummus, R. R. (2003) “A Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Flexibility” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(6):446- 456. Garavelli, A. C. (2003) “Flexibility Configurations for the Supply Chain Management” International Journal of Production Economics, 85:141-153.
  3. Giachettia, R. E., Martinez, L. D., Sáenz, O. A. and Chen, C. S. (2003) “Analysis of the Structural Measures of Flexibility and Agility Using A Measurement Theoretical Framework” International Journal of Production Economics, 86:47-62.
  4. Giunipero, L. C., Denslow, D. and Eltantawy, R. (2005) “Purchasing/Supply Chain Management Flexibility: Moving to An Entrepreneurial Skill Set” Industrial Marketing Management, 34:602-613.
  5. Gong, Z. (2008) “An Economic Evaluation Model of Supply Chain Flexibility” European Journal of Operational Research, 184: 745-758.
  6. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. ve Tirtirogu, E. (2001) “Performance Measures and Metrics in A Supply Chain Environment” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2): 71-87.
  7. Howell, D.C. (2009), “Treatment of Missing Data”, http://www.uvm.edu/~dhowell/StatPages/More_Stuff/ Missing_Data/Missing.html, (02.09.2009)
  8. Kline, R. B. (2005) “Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling”, 2nd Edition,
  9. New York, USA, The Guilford Press.
  10. Kumar, V., Fantazy, K. A., Kumar, U. ve Boyle, T. A. (2006) “Implementation and Management Framework for Supply Chain Flexibility” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(3):303-319.
  11. Lokupitiya, R. S., Lokupitiya, E. ve Paustian, K. (2006) “Comparison of Missing Value Imputation Methods For Crop Yield Data” Environmetrics, 26:339–349.
  12. Lummus, R. R., Duclos, L. K. ve Vokurka, R. J. (2003) “Supply Chain Flexibility: Building a New Model” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 4(1):1-13.
  13. Lummus, R. R., Vokurka, R. J. ve Duclos, L. K. (2005) “Delphi Study on Supply Chain Flexibility” International Journal of Production Research, 43(13):2687–2708.
  14. Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F. ve Steyer, R. (2003) “(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling” Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(22):1-22
  15. Nilchiani, R. ve Hastings, D. E. (2007) “Measuring the Value of Flexibility in Space Systems: A Six-Element Framework” Systems Engineering, 10(1):26-44.
  16. Oberoi, J. S