SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Relationships between employees’ perceptions of quality of work life, intent to remain with the organization and employee absenteeism

İşgörenlerin çalışma yaşamı kalitesi algılamalarının işte kalma niyeti ve işe devamsızlık ile ilişkisi

Mahmut DEMİR
Pages
453–464
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found to be a positive relationship between quality of work life factors and intent to remain with the organization factor while a negative relationship between quality of work life factors and employee absenteeism support factor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the relationships between employees’ perceptions of quality of work life, intent to remain with the organization and employee absenteeism at the airport businesses in Dalaman.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected by researchers in face-to-face interviews with 229 employees and were analyzed with SPSS and LISREL statistical programs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found to be a positive relationship between quality of work life factors and intent to remain with the organization factor while a negative relationship between quality of work life factors and employee absenteeism support factor.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between employees’ perceptions of quality of work life, intent to remain with the organization and employee absenteeism at the airport businesses in Dalaman. Previously a literature review was conducted for research model and then questionnaire was developed from the studies in the literature. Data were collected by researchers in face-to-face interviews with 229 employees and were analyzed with SPSS and LISREL statistical programs. Structural and convergent validity of the data have revealed with the explanatory factor analysis. And then, it was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis to determine the relationship among quality of work life, intent to remain with the organization and employee absenteeism in structural equation modelling. It was found to be a positive relationship between quality of work life factors and intent to remain with the organization factor while a negative relationship between quality of work life factors and employee absenteeism support factor. On the other hand, it was found to be a negative relationship between intent to remain with the organization and employee absenteeism. As a result, all hypotheses have been supported.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Dalaman havalimanında faaliyet gösteren ulaştırma, seyahat ve yer hizmetleri işletmelerinde işgörenlerin çalışma yaşamı kalitesi algılamaları-işte kalma niyeti-işe devamsızlık ilişkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Öncelikle konuyla ilgili bir literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Buradan elde edilen bilgilerle araştırma modeli oluşturulmuş ve buna göre bir anket geliştirilmiştir. Yüzyüze görüşme tekniği kullanılarak toplam 229 katılımcıya bir anket uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS ve LISREL istatistik programları ile analiz edilerek açıklayıcı faktör analizi ile verilerin yapısal ve yakınsak geçerliliği yapılmıştır. Daha sonra çalışma yaşamı kalitesi-işte kalma niyeti-işe devamsızlık arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla oluşturulan hipotezlerin ölçülmesi için yapısal eşitlik modelinde doğrulayıcı faktör analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma yaşamı kalitesi ile işte kalma niyeti faktörleri arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki tespit edilirken işe devamsızlık faktörü ile negatif yönlü bir ilişkinin varlığı ortaya konulmuştur. Diğer yandan işte kalma niyeti ile işe devamsızlık faktörleri arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuçta oluşturulan tüm hipotezler desteklenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, M. (2022). Relationships between employees’ perceptions of quality of work life, intent to remain with the organization and employee absenteeism. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 453–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/495478

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adler, A. (1999) Normal Yaşamda ve İş Yaşamında Psikolojik Aktivite, (Çeviren: Belkıs Çorakçı), İstanbul,
  2. Say Yayınevi.
  3. Arnold, J. ve Davey, K.M. (1999) “Graduates’ Work Experiences as Predictors of Organisational Commitment, Intention to Leave, and Turnover: Which Experiences Really Matter?” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(2): 211-238.
  4. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P.S. ve Chen, Z.X. (2002) “Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3): 267-285.
  5. Bassi, L. J., ve Diğerleri (2000) Profiting from Learning: Do Firms. Investments in Education and Training Pay Off?, An ASTD/Saba White Paper. Bayazıt, Ö. (1998) “Toplam Kalite Yönetiminin Yürütülmesinde Önemli Bir Araç: Kalite Çemberleri” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 53(1): 95-105.
  6. Beauregard, T.A. ve Henry, L.C. (2009) “Making the Link between Work-Life Balance Practices and Organizational Performance” Human Resource Management Review, 19: 9-22.
  7. Beh, L. ve Rose, R.C. (2007) “Linking QWL and Job Performance: Implications for Organizations” Performance Improvement, 46(6): 30-35.
  8. Bowditch, J.L. ve Buono, A.F. (1994)
  9. A Primer on Organizational Behavior, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc. Browne, J. H. (2005) “High Performance Work Strategies: Empowerment or Repression For The Working Class?” Journal of Business & Economics Research, 3(7): 1-4.
  10. Can, A. (1991) “Çalışma Hayatının Kalitesinin Geliştirilmesi” Ankara, I. Verimlilik Kongresi MPM Yayınları: 454: 89-101.
  11. Carayon, P. ve Smith, M.J. (2000) “Work Organization and Ergonomics” Applied Ergonomics, 31: 649-662.
  12. Carmeli, A., Elizur, D. ve Yaniv, E. (2007) “The Theory of Work Commitment: A Facet Analysis” Personnel Review, 36(4): 638-649.
  13. Cooper, C.L. (2009) “The Transition from the Quality of Working Life to Organizational Behavior: The First Two Decades” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 3–8.
  14. Da Silva, N., Hutcheson, J., ve Wahl, G.D. (2010) “Organizational Strategy And Employee Outcomes: A Person– Organization Fit Perspective” The Journal of Psychology, 144(2): 145-161.
  15. Danford, A. ve Diğerleri (2008) “Partnership, High Performance Work Systems and Quality of Working Life” New Technology, Work and Employment, 23(3): 151-166.
  16. DeConinck, J.B. ve Stilwell, C.D. (2004) “Incorporating Organizational Justice, Role States, Pay Satisfaction and Supervisor Satisfaction in a Model of Turnover Intentions” Journal of Business Research, 57: 225-231