SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

An ampirical study of the mobbing applied to Academicians

Akademisyenlere uygulanan psikolojik tacize yönelik ampirik bir araştırma

Kubilay ÖZYER
Ufuk ORHAN
Pages
511–518
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mobbing is an organizational neurosis seen in many sectors around the world which affects the victim both physically and mentally and damages organizations by quitting work and the decreasing of productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobbing is an organizational neurosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of Mobbing is to make the victim leave his/her job by making him/her uncomfortable in a community by making him/her completely accept and depend on the will power and the personality of the aggressor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mobbing is an organizational neurosis seen in many sectors around the world which affects the victim both physically and mentally and damages organizations by quitting work and the decreasing of productivity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mobbing is an organizational neurosis. The aim of Mobbing is to make the victim leave his/her job by making him/her uncomfortable in a community by making him/her completely accept and depend on the will power and the personality of the aggressor. In the Mobbing process individual and organizational factors are important. Mobbing is an organizational neurosis seen in many sectors around the world which affects the victim both physically and mentally and damages organizations by quitting work and the decreasing of productivity.

Özet

Psikolojik taciz, bir örgütsel nevrozdur. Psikolojik tacizin amacı, kurbanı saldırganın iradesine bağımlı hale getirmesi ve kişiliğini tartışmasız kabul etmesi suretiyle örgüt içinde huzursuz bir ortam yaratarak mağdurun işten ayrılmasını sağlamaktır. Psikolojik tacizin meydana gelmesinde bireysel ve örgütsel nedenler rol oynar. Psikolojik taciz, dünyada birçok sektörde rastlanılan, mağduru fiziksel ve psikolojik olarak etkileyen, verimliliğin azalması ve işten çıkma gibi nedenlerle örgütlere zarar veren bir nevroz durumudur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYER, K., ORHAN, U. (2022). An ampirical study of the mobbing applied to Academicians. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 511–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/495441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Açıkgöz, B. ve Özdemir, M. (2007) “Mobbinge Maruz Kalanların Tepki Seviyelerinin Ölçümü’’ Sakarya Üniversitesi 15. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 911-918.
  2. Ayan, S. (2011) “Üniversitelerde Araştırma Görevlilerine Yönelik Psikolojik Taciz: Gazi, Kocaeli ve Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Örneği’’ Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 27:1-18
  3. Ayrancı, Ü., Yenilmez, Ç., Günay, Y. ve Kaptanoğlu C. (2002) “Çeşitli Sağlık Kurumlarında ve Sağlık Meslek Gruplarında Şiddete Uğrama Sıklığı” Anadolu Psikoyatri Dergisi, 3:147-154.
  4. Baron, R. A., Neuman, J. H. ve Geddes, D. (1999) “Social and Personal Determinants of Workplace Aggression: Evidence for the Impact of Perceived Injustice and the Type A Behaviour Pattern” Aggressive Behaviour, 25:281-296.
  5. Björkquist, K., Österman, K ve Hjelt-Back, M. (1994) “Aggression Among University Employees’’Aggressive Behavior, 20:73-184.
  6. Chappell, D. ve Martino, V.D. (1998) “Violence at Work” International Labour Office, Geneva. Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P.K., ve Pereira, B. (2002) “Measuring Workplace Bullying’’ Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7:33-51.
  7. Çobanoğlu, Ş. (2005) Mobbing: İşyerinde Duygusal Saldırı ev Mücadele Yöntemleri, 1.Baskı,
  8. İstanbul, Timaş Yayınları: 26-27.
  9. Davenport, N., R. D. Schwartz, P. Gail Elliott (2003) Mobbing: İşyerinde Duygusal Taciz 1.Baskı,
  10. İstanbul,
  11. Sistem Yayıncılık. Douglas, S.C. ve Martinko M.C. (2001) “Exploring the Role of Individual Difference in the Prediction of Workplace Aggression’’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4):547-559.
  12. Dursun, S. ve Aytaç S. (2011) “İşyerinde Şiddet Davranışlarının Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Uygulama’’ Tisk Akademi, 1:7-29.
  13. Einarsen, S. (1999) “The Nature and Causes Of Bullying At Work’’ International Journal of Manpowe, 20(1/2):16-27.
  14. Einarsen S. (2000) “Harassment and Bullying at Work: A Review of The Scandinavian Approach’’ Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4):379-401.
  15. Einarsen, S. ve Rakness, B (1997) “Harassment in The Workplace and Victimization of Men’’ Violance and Victims, 12:247-263.
  16. Einarsen, S. ve Skogstad, A. (1996) “Bullying at Work: Epidemiological Findings in Public and Private Organizations’’ European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2):185-201.
  17. Farrell, G.A., Bobrowski, C. ve Bobrowski, P. (2006) “Scoping Workplace Aggression in Nursing: Findings from an Australian Study” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(6):778-787.
  18. Greenberg, L. ve Barling, J. (1999) “Predicting Employee Aggression Against Coworkers, Subo